The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - April-June (2009 vol.2)
pp: 103-110
Chih-Hung King , University of California, Los Angeles and Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology, Los Angeles
Martin O. Culjat , University of California, Los Angeles and Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology, Los Angeles
Miguel L. Franco , University of California, Los Angeles and Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology, Los Angeles
Catherine E. Lewis , University of California, Los Angeles and Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology, Los Angeles
Erik P. Dutson , University of California, Los Angeles and Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology, Los Angeles
Warren S. Grundfest , University of California, Los Angeles and Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology, Los Angeles
James W. Bisley , University of California, Los Angeles and Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology, Los Angeles
ABSTRACT
Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery has gained widespread use over the past decade, but the technique is currently operated in the absence of haptic feedback during tissue manipulation. We have developed a complete tactile feedback system, consisting of a piezoresistive force sensor, control system, and pneumatic balloon tactile display, and mounted directly onto a da Vinci surgical robotic system. To evaluate the effect of tactile feedback on robotic manipulation, a group of novices ({\rm n} = 16) and experts ({\rm n} = 4) were asked to perform three blocks of peg transfer tasks with the tactile feedback system in place. Force generated at the end-effectors was measured in all three blocks, but tactile feedback was active only during the middle block. All subjects used higher force when the feedback system was inactive. When active, subjects immediately used substantially less force and still maintained appropriate grip during the task. After the system was again turned off, grip force increased significantly to prefeedback levels. These results demonstrate that robotic manipulations without tactile feedback are done with more force than needed to grasp objects. Therefore, the addition of tactile feedback allows the surgeon to grasp with less force, and may improve control of the robotic system and handling of tissues and other objects.
INDEX TERMS
Surgical robotics, tactile display, haptic system design and analysis, haptic perception, haptic real-time control, haptic human performance, telemanipulation.
CITATION
Chih-Hung King, Martin O. Culjat, Miguel L. Franco, Catherine E. Lewis, Erik P. Dutson, Warren S. Grundfest, James W. Bisley, "Tactile Feedback Induces Reduced Grasping Force in Robot-Assisted Surgery", IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol.2, no. 2, pp. 103-110, April-June 2009, doi:10.1109/TOH.2009.4
REFERENCES
[1] R.M. Satava, “Surgical Robotics: The Early Chronicles: A Personal Historical Perspective,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 12, pp. 6-16, 2002.
[2] G.H. Ballantyne, “Robotic Surgery, Telerobotic Surgery, Telepresence, and Telementoring,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, no. 10, pp.1389-1402, 2002.
[3] Y. Munz, K. Moorthy, A. Dosis, J.D. Hernandez, S. Bann, F. Bello, S. Martin, A. Darzi, and T. Rockall, “The Benefits of Stereoscopic Vision in Robotic-Assisted Performance on Bench Models,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 611-616, 2004.
[4] K. Moorthy, Y. Munz, A. Dosis, J. Hernandez, S. Martin, F. Bello, T. Rockall, and A. Darzi, “Dexterity Enhancement with Robotic Surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 790-795, 2004.
[5] J. Marescaux, J. Leroy, M. Gagner, F. Rubino, D. Mutter, M. Vix, S.E. Butner, and M.K. Smith, “Transatlantic Robot-Assisted Telesurgery,” Nature, vol. 413, no. 6854, pp. 379-380, 2001.
[6] J. Marescaux, M.K. Smith, D. Folscher, F. Jamali, B. Malassagne, and J. Leroy, “Telerobotic Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Initial Clinical Experience with 25 Patients,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 234, pp. 1-7, 2001.
[7] A.R. Lanfranco, A.E. Castellanos, J.P. Desai, and W.C. Meyers, “Robotic Surgery—A Current Perspective,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 239, pp. 14-21, 2004.
[8] C.R. Wagner, N. Stylopoulus, and R.D. Howe, “The Role of Force Feedback in Surgery: Analysis of Blunt Dissection,” Proc. Symp. HAPTICS, pp. 68-74, 2002.
[9] G.C. Burdea, Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality, pp. 3-4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996.
[10] M. Kitagawa, D. Dokko, A.M. Okamura, and D.D. Yuh, “Effect of Sensory Substitution on Suture-Manipulation Forces for Robotic Surgical Systems,” J. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 129, pp. 151-158, 2005.
[11] A.M. Okamura, R.J. Webster, J.T. Nolin, K.W. Johnson, and H. Jafry, “The Haptic Scissors: Cutting in Virtual Environments,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 828-833, 2003.
[12] J. Rosen, B. Hannaford, M.P. MacFarlane, and M.N. Sinanan, “Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery-Experimental Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Biomedical Eng., vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1212-1221, Oct. 1999.
[13] T. Hu, A.E. Castellanos, G. Tholey, and J.P. Desai, “Real-Time Haptic Feedback in Laparoscopic Tools for Use in Gastro-Intestinal Surgery,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, vol. 2488, pp. 66-74, 2002.
[14] M. Tavakoli, R.V. Patel, and M. Moallem, “A Force Reflective Master-Slave System for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3077-3082, 2003.
[15] S. Ernst, “Robotic Approach to Catheter Ablation,” Current Opinion in Cardiology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 28-31, 2008.
[16] G. Tholey, J.P. Desai, and A.E. Castellanos, “Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 102-109, 2005.
[17] L.N. Verner and A.M. Okamura, “Effects of Translational and Gripping Force Feedback are Decoupled in a 4-Degree-of-Freedom Telemanipulator,” Proc. Second Joint Eurohaptics Conf. and Symp. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 286-291, 2007.
[18] C.R. Wagner and R.D. Howe, “Force Feedback Benefit Depends on Experience in Multiple Degree of Freedom Robotic Surgery Task,” IEEE Trans. Robotics, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1235-1240, Dec. 2007.
[19] B.T. Bethea, A.M. Okamura, M. Kitagawa, T.P. Fitton, S.M. Cattaneo, V.L. Gott, W.A. Baumgartner, and D.D. YUH, “Application of Haptic Feedback to Robotic Surgery,” J. Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques A, vol. 14, pp. 191-195, 2004.
[20] V.G. Macefield, C. Häger-Ross, and R.S. Johansson, “Control of Grip Force during Restraint of an Object Held between Finger and Thumb: Responses of Cutaneous Afferents from the Digits,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 155-171, 1996.
[21] V.G. Macefield and R.S. Johansson, “Control of Grip Force during Restraint of an Object Held between Finger and Thumb: Responses of Muscle and Joint Afferents from the Digits,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 172-184, 1996.
[22] G. Moy, C. Wagner, and R.S. Fearing, “A Compliant Tactile Display for Teletaction, Robotics and Automation,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 3409-3415, 2000.
[23] R.D. Howe, W.J. Peine, D.A. Kantarinis, and J.S. Son, “Remote Palpation Technology,” IEEE Eng. in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 318-323, May/June 1995.
[24] H. Tang and D.J. Beebe, “A Microfabricated Electrostatic Haptic Display for Persons with Visual Impairments,” IEEE Trans. Rehabilitation Eng., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 241-248, Sept. 1998.
[25] V. Hayward and J.M. Cruz-Hernandez, “Tactile Display Device Using Distributed Lateral Skin Stretch,” Proc. Int'l Mechanical Eng. Congress & Exposition (IMECE) Conf., pp. 1309-1314, 2000.
[26] A. Bicchi, E.P. Scilingo, and D. De Rossi, “Haptic Discrimination of Softness in Teleoperation: The Role of the Contact Area Spread Rate,” IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 496-504, Oct. 2000.
[27] C.H. King, M.O. Culjat, M. Franco, J.W. Bisley, E. Dutson, and W.S. Grundfest, “Optimization of a Pneumatic Balloon Tactile Display for Robotic Surgery Based on Human Perception,” IEEE Trans. Biomedical Eng., vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 2593-2600, Nov. 2008.
[28] C.H. King, M. Franco, M.O. Culjat, A.T. Higa, J.W. Bisley, E. Dutson, and W.S. Grundfest, “Fabrication and Characterization of a Balloon Actuator Array for Haptic Feedback in Robotic Surgery,” ASME J. Medical Devices, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 041066-1-041066-7, 2008.
[29] M.O. Culjat, C.H. King, M.L. Franco, J.W. Bisley, E. Dutson, and W.S. Grundfest, “Pneumatic Balloon Actuators for Tactile Feedback in Robotic Surgery,” Industrial Robot, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 449-455, 2008.
[30] J.H. Peters, G.M. Fried, L.L. Swanstrom, N.J. Soper, L.F. Sillin, B. Schirmer, K. Hoffman,, andthe SAGES FLS Committee, “Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Program of Education and Assessment of the Basic Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Surgery, vol. 135, pp. 21-27, 2004.
[31] R.S. Johansson and G. Westling, “Roles of Glabrous Skin Receptors and Sensorimotor Memory in Automatic Control of Precision Grip When Lifting Rougher or More Slippery Objects,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 550-64, 1984.
[32] G. Westling and R.S. Johansson, “Factors Influencing the Force Control during Precision Grip,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 277-284, 1984.
[33] R.S. Johansson, C. Hger, and L. Bäckström, “Somatosensory Control of Precision Grip during Unpredictable Pulling Loads. III. Impairments during Digital Anesthesia,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 204-213, 1992.
[34] A.S. Augurelle, A.M. Smith, T. Lejeune, and J.L. Thonnard, “Importance of Cutaneous Feedback in Maintaining a Secure Grip during Manipulation of Hand-Held Objects,” J. Neurophysiology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 665-671, 2003.
[35] C.H. King, M.O. Culjat, M.L. Franco, G.P. Carman, J.W. Bisley, E. Dutson, and W.S. Grundfest, “A Multi-Element Tactile Feedback System for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 52-56, Jan.-Mar. 2009.
24 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool