The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.07 - July (2013 vol.19)
pp: 1109-1121
C. Ziemkiewicz , Aptima, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA
A. Ottley , Dept. of Comput. Sci., Tufts Univ., Medford, MA, USA
R. J. Crouser , Dept. of Comput. Sci., Tufts Univ., Medford, MA, USA
A. R. Yauilla , Dept. of Comput. Sci., Winthrop Univ., Rock Hill, SC, USA
S. L. Su , Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
W. Ribarsky , Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
R. Chang , Dept. of Comput. Sci., Tufts Univ., Medford, MA, USA
Existing research suggests that individual personality differences are correlated with a user's speed and accuracy in solving problems with different types of complex visualization systems. We extend this research by isolating factors in personality traits as well as in the visualizations that could have contributed to the observed correlation. We focus on a personality trait known as "locus of control” (LOC), which represents a person's tendency to see themselves as controlled by or in control of external events. To isolate variables of the visualization design, we control extraneous factors such as color, interaction, and labeling. We conduct a user study with four visualizations that gradually shift from a list metaphor to a containment metaphor and compare the participants' speed, accuracy, and preference with their locus of control and other personality factors. Our findings demonstrate that there is indeed a correlation between the two: participants with an internal locus of control perform more poorly with visualizations that employ a containment metaphor, while those with an external locus of control perform well with such visualizations. These results provide evidence for the externalization theory of visualization. Finally, we propose applications of these findings to adaptive visual analytics and visualization evaluation.
Layout, Data visualization, Problem-solving, Correlation, Visual analytics, Electronic mail,locus of control, Visualization, individual differences
C. Ziemkiewicz, A. Ottley, R. J. Crouser, A. R. Yauilla, S. L. Su, W. Ribarsky, R. Chang, "How Visualization Layout Relates to Locus of Control and Other Personality Factors", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.19, no. 7, pp. 1109-1121, July 2013, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.180
[1] S.E. Palmer, Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology, vol. 1, MIT Press, 1999.
[2] C.G. Healey, “Perception in Visualization,” North Carolina State Univ., , Retrieved, Mar. 2011.
[3] T.M. Green and B. Fisher, “Towards the Personal Equation of Interaction: The Impact of Personality Factors on Visual Analytics Interface Interaction,” Proc. IEEE Symp. Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2010.
[4] T.M. Green, D.H. Jeong, and B. Fisher, “Using Personality Factors to Predict Interface Learning Performance,” Proc. Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences 43, Jan. 2010.
[5] A. Dillon and C. Watson, “User Analysis in HCI: The Historical Lesson from Individual Differences Research,” Int'l J. Human-Computer Studies, vol. 45, pp. 619-637, 1996.
[6] C. Conati and H. Maclaren, “Exploring the Role of Individual Differences in Information Visualization,” Proc. Working Conf. Advanced Visual Interfaces, my-papersAVI-2008-cameraWithInteraction.pdf , 2008.
[7] B. Allen, “Individual Differences and the Conundrums of User-Centered Design: Two Experiments,” J. Am. Soc. Information Science, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 508-520, http://www3.interscience. fulltext/71001471PDFSTART, 2000.
[8] C. Chen, “Individual Differences in a Spatial-Semantic Virtual Environment,” J. Am. Soc. Information Science, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 529-542, fulltext/71001476PDFSTART, 2000.
[9] C. Ziemkiewicz and R. Kosara, “Preconceptions and Individual Differences in Understanding Visual Metaphors,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 911-918, 2009.
[10] L.R. Goldberg, “An alternative Description of Personality: The Big-Five Factor Structure,” J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1216-1229, 1990.
[11] B. Tversky, “Functional Significance of Visuospatial Representations,” Handbook of Higher-Level Visuospatial Thinking, P. Shah and A. Miyake, eds., pp. 1-34, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005.
[12] B. Tversky, M. Agrawala, J. Heiser, P.U. Lee, P. Hanrahan, D. Phan, C. Stolte, and M.-P. Daniele, “Cognitive Design Principles: From Cognitive Models to Computer Models,” Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Eng., L. Magnani, ed., pp. 1-20, King's College, 2007.
[13] J. Heiser and B. Tversky, “Mental Models of Complex Systems: Structure and Function,” http:/ wbt/diagrams/papers/mental_models-heiser-tversky.pdf, 2012.
[14] B. Tversky, J. Zacks, P.U. Lee, and J. Heiser, “Lines, Blobs, Crosses, and Arrows: Diagrammatic Communication with Schematic Figures,” Theory and application of diagrams, M. Anderson, P. Cheng, and V. Haarslev, eds., pp. 221-230, Springer, 2000.
[15] M. McCaulley, “The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A Jungian Model for Problem Solving,” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 1987, no. 30, pp. 37-53, 1987.
[16] L. Uziel, “The Extraverted and the Neurotic Glasses are of Different Colors,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 745-754, 2006.
[17] J. Chartrand, M. Rose, T. Elliott, C. Marmarosh, and S. Caldwell, “Peeling Back the Onion: Personality, Problem Solving, and Career Decision-Making Style Correlates of Career Indecision,” J. Career Assessment, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 66-82, 1993.
[18] F.H. Farley, “Individual Differences in Solution Time in Error-Free Problem Solving,” British J. Social and Clinical Psychology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 306-309, 1966.
[19] T. Judge, A. Erez, J. Bono, and C. Thoresen, “Are Measures of Self-Esteem, Neuroticism, Locus of Control, and Generalized Self-Efficacy Indicators of a Common Core Construct?” J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 693-710, 2002.
[20] J. Walsh, J. Wilding, M. Eysenck, and J. Valentine, “Neuroticism, Locus of Control, Type a Behaviour Pattern and Occupational Stress,” Work & Stress, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 148-159, 1997.
[21] J.B. Rotter, “Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement,” Psychological Monographs, vol. 80, no. 609, pp. 1-28, 1966.
[22] T.A. Judge and J.E. Bono, “Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations Traits—Self-Esteem, Generalized Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and Emotional Stability—with Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” J. Applied Psychology, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 80-92, 2001.
[23] M.J. Findley and H.M. Cooper, “Locus of Control and Academic Achievement: A Literature Review,” J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 419-427, 1983.
[24] C.R. Anderson, “Locus of Control, Coping Behaviors, and Performance in a Stress Setting: A Longitudinal Study,” J. Applied Psychology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 446-451, 1977.
[25] S. Cassidy and P. Eachus, “Learning Style, Academic Belief Systems, Self-Report Student Proficiency and Academic Achievement in Higher Education,” Educational Psychology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 307-320, 2000.
[26] L.R. Goldberg, J.A. Johnson, H.W. Eber, R. Hogan, M.C. Ashton, C.R. Cloninger, and H.C. Gough, “The Int'l Personality Item Pool and the Future of Public-Domain Personality Measures,” J. Research in Personality, vol. 40, pp. 84-96, 2006.
[27] J. Heer and M. Bostock, “Crowdsourcing Graphical Perception: Using Mechanical Turk to Assess Visualization Design,” Proc. 28th Int'l Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 203-212. 2010,
[28] R. Kosara and C. Ziemkiewicz, “Do Mechanical Turks Dream of Square Pie Charts?” Proc. BELIV Workshop, pp. 373-382, 2010.
[29] A. Kittur, E.H. Chi, and B. Suh, “Crowdsourcing User Studies with Mechanical Turk,” Proc. 26th Ann. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 453-456, 2008,
[30] S. Hamlyn-Wright, R. Draghi-Lorenz, and J. Ellis, “Locus of Control Fails to Mediate between Stress and Anxiety and Depression in Parents of Children with a Developmental Disorder,” Autism, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 489-501, 2007.
[31] L.M. Lapierre and T.D. Allen, “Control at Work, Control at Home, and Planning Behavior: Implications for Work Family Conflict,” J. Management, Published Online Before Print in J. of Management, 2010.
[32] C. Ziemkiewicz and R. Kosara, “The Shaping of Information by Visual Metaphors,” IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1269-1276, Nov./Dec. 2008.
[33] Nat'l Center for Biotechnology Information, “NCBI Genome Database,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govgenome/, 2010/
[34] M.C. Ioannou, K. Mogg, and B.P. Bradley, “Vigilance for Threat: Effects of Anxiety and Defensiveness,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 36, pp. 1879-1891, 2004.
[35] J. Hollan, E. Hutchins, and D. Kirsh, “Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research,” ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 174-196, 2000.
[36] Z. Liu, N. Nersessian, and J. Stasko, “Distributed Cognition as a Theoretical Framework for Information Visualization,” IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1173-1180, Nov./Dec. 2008.
[37] E.R. Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, 1983.
[38] J.S. Yi, “Implications of Individual Differences on Evaluating Information Visualization Techniques,” Proc. BELIV Workshop, 2010.
366 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool