The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - April (2013 vol.19)
pp: 644-651
ABSTRACT
Pie menus are a well-known technique for interacting with 2D environments and so far a large body of research documents their usage and optimizations. Yet, comparatively little research has been done on the usability of pie menus in immersive virtual environments (IVEs). In this paper we reduce this gap by presenting an implementation and evaluation of an extended hierarchical pie menu system for IVEs that can be operated with a six-degrees-of-freedom input device. Following an iterative development process, we first developed and evaluated a basic hierarchical pie menu system. To better understand how pie menus should be operated in IVEs, we tested this system in a pilot user study with 24 participants and focus on item selection. Regarding the results of the study, the system was tweaked and elements like check boxes, sliders, and color map editors were added to provide extended functionality. An expert review with five experts was performed with the extended pie menus being integrated into an existing VR application to identify potential design issues. Overall results indicated high performance and efficient design.
INDEX TERMS
Layout, Usability, Error analysis, Context, Performance evaluation, Atmospheric measurements, Particle measurements,user study., Pie menus, interaction, user interfaces
CITATION
S. Gebhardt, S. Pick, F. Leithold, B. Hentschel, T. Kuhlen, "Extended Pie Menus for Immersive Virtual Environments", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.19, no. 4, pp. 644-651, April 2013, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.31
REFERENCES
[1] I. Assenmacher, and T. Kuhlen., The ViSTA Virtual Reality Toolkit. In Proceedings of the IEEE VR 2008 Workshop Software Engineering and Architectures for Realtime Interactive Systems (SEARIS), pages 23-28. Shaker Verlag, 2008.
[2] D. Bowman, E. Kruijff, J. LaViola,, and I. Poupyrev., 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004.
[3] D. Bowman and C. Wingrave., Design and Evaluation of Menu Systems for Immersive Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality 2001 Conference, page 149. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
[4] J. Callahan, D. Hopkins, M. Weiser, and B. Shneiderman., An Empirical Comparison of Pie vs. Linear Menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 95-100. ACM, 1988.
[5] X. Cao and R. Balakrishnan., VisionWand: Interaction Techniques for Large Displays Using a Passive Wand Tracked in 3D. In Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 173-182. ACM, 2003.
[6] K. Das and C. Borst., An Evaluation of Menu Properties and Pointing Techniques in a Projection-based VR Environment. In IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pages 47-50. IEEE, 2010.
[7] P. Fitts and J. Petersen., Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2): 103-112, 1964.
[8] J. Grosjean, J.-M. Burkhardt, S. Coquillart,, and P. Richard., Evaluation of the Command and Control Cube. In Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pages 473-478. IEEE, 2002.
[9] M. Hassenzahl, M. Burmester,, and F. Koller., AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualitt. In Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung. Teubner, 2003.
[10] D. Hopkins., The Design and Implementation of Pie Menus. Dr. Dobb's Journal, 16(12): 16-26, 1991.
[11] R. Komerska and C. Ware., A Study of Haptic Linear and Pie Menus in a 3D Fish Tank VR Environment. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pages 224-231. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
[12] G. Kurtenbach, A. Sellen, and W. Buxton., An Empirical Evaluation of Some Articulatory and Cognitive Aspects of Marking Menus. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1): 1-23, 1993.
[13] B. Laugwitz, T. Held, and M. Schrepp., Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society on HCI and Usability for Education and Work, pages 63-76. Springer-Verlag, 2008.
[14] J. Lewis., IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1): 57-78, 1995.
[15] W. Mackay., Which Interaction Technique Works When? Floating Palettes, Marking Menus and Toolglasses Support Different Task Strategies. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 203-208. ACM, 2002.
[16] T. Ni, R. McMahan,, and D. Bowman., Tech-note: rapMenu: Remote Menu Selection Using Freehand Gestural Input. In IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pages 55-58. IEEE, 2008.
[17] P. Polson, C. Lewis, J. Rieman,, and C. Wharton., Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(5): 741-773, 1992.
[18] G. Ren and E. O'Neil., 3D Marking Menu Selection with Freehand Gestures. In IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pages 61-68. IEEE, 2012.
[19] M. Tapia and G. Kurtenbach., Some Design Refinements and Principles on the Appearance and Behavior of Marking Menus. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface and Software Technology, pages 189-195. ACM, 1995.
[20] S. Zhao and R. Balakrishnan., Simple vs. Compound Mark Hierarchical Marking Menus. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 33-42. ACM, 2004.
40 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool