The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.12 - Dec. (2012 vol.18)
pp: 2226-2235
T. Hollt , King Adbullah Univ. of Sci. & Technol., Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
W. Freiler , SimVis GmbH, Austria
F. Gschwantner , VRVis Res. Center, Vienna, Austria
H. Doleisch , SimVis GmbH, Austria
G. Heinemann , Heinemann Oil GmbH, Austria
M. Hadwiger , King Adbullah Univ. of Sci. & Technol., Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
The most important resources to fulfill today's energy demands are fossil fuels, such as oil and natural gas. When exploiting hydrocarbon reservoirs, a detailed and credible model of the subsurface structures is crucial in order to minimize economic and ecological risks. Creating such a model is an inverse problem: reconstructing structures from measured reflection seismics. The major challenge here is twofold: First, the structures in highly ambiguous seismic data are interpreted in the time domain. Second, a velocity model has to be built from this interpretation to match the model to depth measurements from wells. If it is not possible to obtain a match at all positions, the interpretation has to be updated, going back to the first step. This results in a lengthy back and forth between the different steps, or in an unphysical velocity model in many cases. This paper presents a novel, integrated approach to interactively creating subsurface models from reflection seismics. It integrates the interpretation of the seismic data using an interactive horizon extraction technique based on piecewise global optimization with velocity modeling. Computing and visualizing the effects of changes to the interpretation and velocity model on the depth-converted model on the fly enables an integrated feedback loop that enables a completely new connection of the seismic data in time domain and well data in depth domain. Using a novel joint time/depth visualization, depicting side-by-side views of the original and the resulting depth-converted data, domain experts can directly fit their interpretation in time domain to spatial ground truth data. We have conducted a domain expert evaluation, which illustrates that the presented workflow enables the creation of exact subsurface models much more rapidly than previous approaches.
solid modelling, data visualisation, fossil fuels, geophysics computing, hydrocarbon reservoirs, interactive systems, natural gas technology, optimisation, seismology, domain expert evaluation, SeiVis, interactive visual subsurface modeling application, energy demands, fossil fuels, oil, natural gas, hydrocarbon reservoirs, economic risks, ecological risks, measured reflection seismics, ambiguous seismic data, unphysical velocity model, interactive horizon extraction technique, global optimization, velocity modeling, depth-converted model, time-depth visualization, spatial ground truth data, Rendering (computer graphics), Cost function, Computational modeling, Data visualization, Biological system modeling, seismic interpretation, Seismic visualization, volume deformation, exploded views
T. Hollt, W. Freiler, F. Gschwantner, H. Doleisch, G. Heinemann, M. Hadwiger, "SeiVis: An Interactive Visual Subsurface Modeling Application", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.18, no. 12, pp. 2226-2235, Dec. 2012, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.259
[1] J. F. Blinn., Models of light reflection for computer synthesized pictures. In Proceedings of the 4th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH ‘77, pages 192-198, 1977.
[2] A. Blinov and M. Petrou, Reconstruction of 3-d horizons from 3-d seismic datasets IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(6): 1421-143 L 2005.
[3] S. Bruckner and M. E, Groller, Exploded views for volume data IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5): 1077-1084, 2006.
[4] L. Castanie, B. Levy, and F. Bosquet, Advances in seismic interpretation using new volume visualization techniques First Break Journal, pages 69-72, 2005.
[5] L. Castanie, B. Levy, and F. Bosquet., Volumeexplorer: Roaming large volumes to couple visualization and data processing for oil and gas ex-ploration. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization Conference ‘05, pages 247-254, 2005.
[6] K. Engel, M. Hadwiger, J. M. Kniss,C. Rezk-Salama,, and D. Weiskopf., Real-Time Volume Graphics. A K Peters, Ltd, 2006.
[7] E. L Etris,N. J. Crabtree, J. Dewar, and Pickford. True depth conversion: More than a pretty picture CSEG Recorder, 26: 11-22, 2001.
[8] M. Faraklioti and M. Petrou, Horizon picking in 3d seismic data volumes Machine Vision and Applications, 15: 216-219, 2004.
[9] T. HoUt., J. Beyer, F. Gschwantner, P. Muigg, H. Doleisch,G. Heine-mann,, and M. Hadwiger., Interactive seismic interpretation with piecewise global energy minimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium 2011, pages 59-66, 2011.
[10] N. Keskes, P. Zaccagnino, D. Rether,, and P. Mermey., Automatic extraction of 3-d seismic horizons. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2(1): 557-559, 1983.
[11] O. D Lampe, C. Correa, K.-L. Ma,, and H. Hauser., Curve-centric volume reformation for comparative visualization IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6): 1235-1242, 2009.
[12] P. Lavest and Y. Chipot, Building complex horizons for 3-d seismic SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 12(1): 159-161, 1993.
[13] M. Levoy, Display of surfaces from volume data Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 8(3): 29-37, may 1988.
[14] M. J. McGuffin, L. Tancau, and R. Balakrishnan., Using deformations for browsing volumetric data. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2003, pages 401-408, 2003.
[15] D. Patel, S. Bruckner, I. Viola,, and M. E., Groller, Seismic volume visualization for horizon extraction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific Visualization Svmposium 2010, pages 73-80, 2010.
[16] R. Pepper and G. Bejarano, Advances in seismic fault interpretation au-tomation Search and Discovery Article 40170, Poster presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, pages 19-22, 2005.
[17] C. Rezk-Salama, M. Scheuering, G. Soza,, and G. Greiner., Fast volumetric deformation on general purpose hardware. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPHIEUROGRAPHICS workshop on Graphics hardware, HWWS ‘01, pages 17-24, 2001.
[18] T. Ropinski,J. Meyer-Spradow, S. Diepenbrock, J. Mensmann,, and K.H. Hinrichs., Interactive volume rendering with dynamic ambient occlusion and color bleeding. Computer Graphics Forum (Eurographics 2008), 27(2): 567-576, 2008.
[19] M. Ruiz, I. Viola, I. Boada, S. Bruckner, M. Feixas,, and M. Sbert., Similarity-based exploded views. In Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Smart Graphics, pages 154-165, 2008.
[20] Schlumberger Information Solutions. Petrel seismic to simulation soft-ware. petrel.aspx.
[21] F. Schulze, K. Buhler, and M. Hadwiger., Direct volume deformation. In Computer Vision and Computer Graphics. Theory and Applications, 21 of Communications in Computer and Information Science, pages 59-72. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
[22] U.S. Energy Information Administration. International energy outlook 2010, 2010.
[23] R. Westermann and C. Rezk-Salama., Real-time volume deformations. Computer Graphics Forum, 20(3): 443-451, 2001.
22 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool