The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - April (2012 vol.18)
pp: 538-545
G. Bruder , Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
V. Interrante , Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Eng., Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
L. Phillips , Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Eng., Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
F. Steinicke , Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
ABSTRACT
Walking is the most natural form of locomotion for humans, and real walking interfaces have demonstrated their benefits for several navigation tasks. With recently proposed redirection techniques it becomes possible to overcome space limitations as imposed by tracking sensors or laboratory setups, and, theoretically, it is now possible to walk through arbitrarily large virtual environments. However, walking as sole locomotion technique has drawbacks, in particular, for long distances, such that even in the real world we tend to support walking with passive or active transportation for longer-distance travel. In this article we show that concepts from the field of redirected walking can be applied to movements with transportation devices. We conducted psychophysical experiments to determine perceptual detection thresholds for redirected driving, and set these in relation to results from redirected walking. We show that redirected walking-and-driving approaches can easily be realized in immersive virtual reality laboratories, e. g., with electric wheelchairs, and show that such systems can combine advantages of real walking in confined spaces with benefits of using vehiclebased self-motion for longer-distance travel.
INDEX TERMS
virtual reality, interactive devices, user interfaces, navigation task, natural navigation, immersive virtual environment, walking locomotion, driving locomotion, walking interface, redirection technique, passive transportation, active transportation, redirected walking, transportation device, perceptual detection threshold, redirected driving, electric wheelchair, vehicle-based self-motion, longer-distance travel, Legged locomotion, Wheelchairs, Laboratories, Visualization, Navigation, Vehicles, Space exploration, motion perception., Redirected walking, redirected driving, natural locomotion, self&#8211
CITATION
G. Bruder, V. Interrante, L. Phillips, F. Steinicke, "Redirecting Walking and Driving for Natural Navigation in Immersive Virtual Environments", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.18, no. 4, pp. 538-545, April 2012, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.55
REFERENCES
[1] M. Avraamides, R. Klatzky, J. Loomis, and R. Golledge, Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychological Science, 15(6) pp. 403-408, 2004.
[2] A. Berthoz, The Brain's Sense of Movement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
[3] J. Boakes and G. Rab, Human Walking, chapter Muscle Activity During Walking, pages 33-51. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2006.
[4] D. Bowman, D. Koller, and L. Hodges, Travel in immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS), pages 45-52. IEEE Press, 1997.
[5] G. Bruder, F. Steinicke, and K. Hinrichs, Arch-Explore: a natural user interface for immersive architectural walkthroughs. In Proceedings of the Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pages 75-82. IEEE Press, 2009.
[6] G. Bruder, F. Steinicke, and P. Wieland, Self-motion illusions in immersive virtual reality environments. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality, pages 39-46. IEEE Press, 2011.
[7] S. Chance, F. Gaunet, A. Beall, and J. Loomis, Locomotion mode affects updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence, 7(2) pp. 168-178, 1998.
[8] J. Dichgans and T. Brandt, Visual vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H. L. Teuber editors, , Perception. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 8, pages 755-804, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1978. Springer.
[9] M. Ernst and H. Bülthoff, Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4) pp. 162-169, 2004.
[10] I. Fründ, N. Haenel, and F. Wichmann, Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. Journal of Vision, 11(6) pp. 1-19, 2011.
[11] A. Grigo and M. Lappe, Dynamical use of different sources of information in heading detection from retinal flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 16(9) pp. 2079-2091, 1999.
[12] H. Groenda, F. Nowak, P. Rößler, and U. Hanebeck, Telepresence techniques for controlling avatar motion in first person games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN), pages 44-53, 2005.
[13] J. Hollerbach, Locomotion interfaces. In Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, pages 239-254, 2002.
[14] R. Hosman, S. Advani, and N. Haeck, Integrated design of flight simulator motion cueing systems. In Proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society Conference on Flight Simulation, pages 1-12, 2002.
[15] V. Interrante, B. Ries, and L. Anderson, Seven League Boots: a new metaphor for augmented locomotion through moderately large scale immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pages 167-170. IEEE Press, 2007.
[16] S. Klein, Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Perception and Psychophysics, 63(8) pp. 1421-1455, 2001.
[17] L. Kohli, E. Burns, D. Miller, and H. Fuchs, Combining passive haptics with redirected walking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Augmented Telexistence, pages 253-254. ACM Press, 2005.
[18] M. Lappe, F. Bremmer, and A. van den Berg, Perception of self-motion from visual flow. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9) pp. 329-336, 1999.
[19] M. Liu, F. Anderson, M. Pandy, and S. Delp, Muscles that support the body also modulate forward progression during walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 39, 2006.
[20] B. Mohler, W. Thompson, S. Creem-Regehr, H. Pick Jr., and W. Warren, Jr, Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Experimental Brain Research, 181(2) pp. 221-228, 2007.
[21] N. Nitzsche, U. Hanebeck, and G. Schmidt, Motion compression for telepresent walking in large target environments. Presence, 13(1) pp. 44-60, 2004.
[22] T. Peck, H. Fuchs, and M. Whitton, An evaluation of navigational ability comparing redirected free exploration with distractors to walking-in-place and joystick locomotion interfaces. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality, pages 56-62. IEEE Press, 2011.
[23] S. Razzaque, Redirected Walking. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2005.
[24] B. Riecke, J. Schulte-Pelkum, M. Avraamides, M. von der Heyde, and H. Bülthoff, Cognitive factors can influence self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 3(3) pp. 194-216, 2006.
[25] R. Ruddle and S. Lessels, The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 16 pp. 1-18, 2009.
[26] M. Slater, M. Usoh, and A. Steed, Taking steps: The influence of a walking metaphor on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 2(3) pp. 201-219, 1995.
[27] F. Steinicke, G. Bruder, J. Jerald, H. Fenz, and M. Lappe, Estimation of detection thresholds for redirected walking techniques. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG), 16(1) pp. 17-27, 2010.
[28] E. Suma, S. Finkelstein, M. Reid, S. Babu, A. Ulinski, and L. Hodges, Evaluation of the cognitive effects of travel technique in complex real and virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG), 16(4) pp. 690-702, 2010.
[29] E. Suma, D. Krum, S. Finkelstein, and M. Bolas, Effects of redirection on spatial orientation in real and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pages 35-38. IEEE Press, 2011.
[30] M. Usoh, K. Arthur, M. Whitton, R. Bastos, A. Steed, M. Slater, and F. Brooks, Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pages 359-364. ACM Press, 1999.
[31] M. Usoh, E. Catena, S. Arman, and M. Slater, Using presence questionaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators in Virtual Environments, 9(5) pp. 497-503, 1999.
[32] M. von der Heyde and B. Riecke, How to cheat in motion simulation - comparing the engineering and fun ride approach to motion cueing. Technical Report 89, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, 2001.
[33] M. Whitton, J. Cohn, P. Feasel, S. Zimmons, S. Razzaque, B. Poulton, B. McLeod, and F. Brooks, Comparing VE locomotion interfaces. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality, pages 123-130. IEEE Press, 2005.
[34] L. Young and S. Bussolari, An experimental evaluation of the use of vestibular models in the design of flight simulator motion washout systems. In Proceedings of the AIAA Simulation Technologies Conference, 1985.
[35] C. Youngblut, R. Johnson, S. Nash, R. Wienclaw, and C. Will, Review of virtual environment interface technology. Technical Report IDA Paper P-3186, Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA), 1996.
30 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool