This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Natural Interaction Metaphors for Functional Validations of Virtual Car Models
September 2011 (vol. 17 no. 9)
pp. 1195-1208
Mathias Moehring, Group Research Virtual Technologies, Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg
Bernd Froehlich, Bauhaus-Universitat Weimar, Weimar
Natural Interaction in virtual environments is a key requirement for the virtual validation of functional aspects in automotive product development processes. Natural Interaction is the metaphor people encounter in reality: the direct manipulation of objects by their hands. To enable this kind of Natural Interaction, we propose a pseudophysical metaphor that is both plausible enough to provide realistic interaction and robust enough to meet the needs of industrial applications. Our analysis of the most common types of objects in typical automotive scenarios guided the development of a set of refined grasping heuristics to support robust finger-based interaction of multiple hands and users. The objects' behavior in reaction to the users' finger motions is based on pseudophysical simulations, which also take various types of constrained objects into account. In dealing with real-world scenarios, we had to introduce the concept of Normal Proxies, which extend objects with appropriate normals for improved grasp detection and grasp stability. An expert review revealed that our interaction metaphors allow for an intuitive and reliable assessment of several functionalities of objects found in a car interior. Follow-up user studies showed that overall task performance and usability are similar for CAVE and HMD environments. For larger objects and more gross manipulation, using the CAVE without employing a virtual hand representation is preferred, but for more fine-grained manipulation and smaller objects, the HMD turns out to be beneficial.

[1] D. Baraff, "Rigid Body Simulation," Course Notes of ACM SIGGRAPH '97, 1997.
[2] C.W. Borst and A.P. Indugula, "Realistic Virtual Grasping," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 91-98, 2005.
[3] D.A. Bowman, E. Kruijff, J.L. LaViolaJr., and I. Poupyrev, 3D User Interfaces, Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley, 2005.
[4] B. Froehlich, H. Tramberend, A. Beers, M. Agrawala, and D. Baraff, "Physically-Based Manipulation on the Responsive Workbench," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 5-11, 2000.
[5] D. Holz, S. Ullrich, M. Wolter, and T. Kuhlen, "Multi-Contact Grasp Interaction for Virtual Environments," J. Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 101-112, 2008.
[6] S.B. Kang and K. Ikeuchi, "A Framework for Recognizing Grasps," Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-91-24, Carnegie Mellon Univ., 1991.
[7] A. Lecuyer, S. Coquillart, A. Kheddar, P. Richard, and P. Coiffet, "Pseudo-Haptic Feedback: Can Isometric Input Devices Simulate Forcefeedback?," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 83-90, 2000.
[8] M. Moehring and B. Froehlich, "Pseudo-Physical Interaction with a Virtual Car Interior in Immersive Environments," Proc. IPT '05, pp. 181-191, 2005.
[9] J.J. Preece, Y. Rogers, and H. Sharp, Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction. Wiley & Sons, 2002.
[10] K. Shoemake, "Animating Rotation with Quaternion Curves," Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 245-254, 1985.
[11] G. Zachmann and A. Rettig, "Natural and Robust Interaction in Virtual Assembly Simulation," Proc. Eighth ISPE Int'l Conf. Concurrent Eng. Research and Applications (ISPE/CE2001), 2001.
[12] H. Salzmann and B. Froehlich, "The Two-User Seating Buck: Enabling Face-to-Face Discussions of Novel Car Interface Concepts," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Conf., pp. 75-82, 2008.
[13] B. Ries, V. Interrante, M. Kaeding, and L. Anderson, "The Effect of Self-Embodiment on Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments," Proc. ACM Symp. Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), pp. 167-170, 2008.
[14] S. Zhai, "Human Performance in Six Degree of Freedom Input Control," PhD thesis, Univ. of Toronto, 1995.
[15] J. Kjeldskov, "Combining Interaction Techniques and Display Types for Virtual Reality," Proc. OzCHI '01, pp. 77-83, 2001.
[16] D.A. Bowman, A. Datey, U. Farooq, Y.S. Ryu, and O. Vasnaik, "Empirical Comparisons of Virtual Environment Displays," Technical Report TR-01-19, Dept. of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, 2001.
[17] W. Qi, R.M. TaylorII, C.G. Haley, and J.-B. Martens, "A Comparison of Immersive HMD, Fish Tank VR and Fish Tank with Haptics Display for Volume Visualization," Proc. Third Symp. Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pp. 51-58, 2006.
[18] C. Demiralp, C.D. Jackson, D.B. Karelitz, S. Zhang, and D.H. Laidlaw, "CAVE and Fishtank Virtual-Reality Displays: A Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison," IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 323-330, May/June 2006.
[19] M. Moehring and B. Froehlich, "Enabling Functional Validation of Virtual Cars through Natural Interaction Metaphors," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 27-34, 2010.
[20] E. Burns, S. Razzaque, A. Panter, M.C. Whitton, and M.R. McCallus, "The Hand Is More Easily Fooled than the Eye: Users Are More Sensitive to Visual Interpenetration than to Visual-Proprioceptive Discrepancy," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2006.

Index Terms:
User interfaces, 3D graphics and realism, input/output devices, systems and software.
Citation:
Mathias Moehring, Bernd Froehlich, "Natural Interaction Metaphors for Functional Validations of Virtual Car Models," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1195-1208, Sept. 2011, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.36
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.