The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.07 - July (2011 vol.17)
pp: 888-899
Frank Steinicke , University of Münster, Münster
Gerd Bruder , University of Münster, Münster
Scott Kuhl , Michigan Technical University, Houghton
Pete Willemsen , University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth
Markus Lappe , University of Münster, Münster
Klaus H. Hinrichs , University of Münster, Münster
ABSTRACT
The display units integrated in today's head-mounted displays (HMDs) provide only a limited field of view (FOV) to the virtual world. In order to present an undistorted view to the virtual environment (VE), the perspective projection used to render the VE has to be adjusted to the limitations caused by the HMD characteristics. In particular, the geometric field of view (GFOV), which defines the virtual aperture angle used for rendering of the 3D scene, is set up according to the display field of view (DFOV). A discrepancy between these two fields of view distorts the geometry of the VE in a way that either minifies or magnifies the imagery displayed to the user. It has been shown that this distortion has the potential to affect a user's perception of the virtual space, sense of presence, and performance on visual search tasks. In this paper, we analyze the user's perception of a VE displayed in a HMD, which is rendered with different GFOVs. We introduce a psychophysical calibration method to determine the HMD's actual field of view, which may vary from the nominal values specified by the manufacturer. Furthermore, we conducted two experiments to identify perspective projections for HMDs, which are identified as natural by subjects—even if these perspectives deviate from the perspectives that are inherently defined by the DFOV. In the first experiment, subjects had to adjust the GFOV for a rendered virtual laboratory such that their perception of the virtual replica matched the perception of the real laboratory, which they saw before the virtual one. In the second experiment, we displayed the same virtual laboratory, but restricted the viewing condition in the real world to simulate the limited viewing condition in a HMD environment. We found that subjects evaluate a GFOV as natural when it is larger than the actual DFOV of the HMD—in some cases up to 50 percent—even when subjects viewed the real space with a limited field of view.
INDEX TERMS
Virtual reality, head-mounted displays, field of view.
CITATION
Frank Steinicke, Gerd Bruder, Scott Kuhl, Pete Willemsen, Markus Lappe, Klaus H. Hinrichs, "Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.17, no. 7, pp. 888-899, July 2011, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2010.248
REFERENCES
[1] P.L. Alfano and G.F. Michel, "Restricting the Field of View: Perceptual and Performance Effects," Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 70, pp. 35-45, 1996.
[2] R.S. Allison, I.P. Howard, and J.E. Zacherx, "Effect of Field Size, Head Motion and Rotational Velocity on Roll Vection and Illusory Self-Tilt in a Tumbling Room," Perception, vol. 28, pp. 299-306, 1999.
[3] K. Arthur, "Effects of Field of View on Task Performance with Head-Mounted Displays," Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 29-30, 1996.
[4] S.H. Creem-Regehr, P. Willemsen, A.A. Gooch, and W.B. Thompson, "The Influences of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Environments," Perception, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 191-204, 2005.
[5] H. Dolezal, Living in a World Transformed: Perceptual and Performatory Adaptation to Visual Distortion. Academic Press, 1982.
[6] M.H. Draper, E.S. Viirre, T.A. Furness, and V.J. Gawron, "Effects of Image Scale and System Time Delay on Simulator Sickness within Head-Coupled Virtual Environments," Human Factors: The J. Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 129-146, 2001.
[7] S. Ellis and K. Nemire, "A Subjective Technique for Calibration of Lines of Sight in Closed Virtual Environment Viewing Systems," Proc. Soc. for Information Display, 1993.
[8] W.G. Furnas, "Generalized Fisheye Views: Visualizing Complex Information Spaces," Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 16-23, 1986.
[9] B. Gillam, "Geometrical Illusions," Am. J. Science, vol. 242, pp. 102-111, 1980.
[10] S. Gilson, A. Fitzgibbon, and A. Glennerster, "Spatial Calibration of an Optical See-Through Head Mounted Display," J. Neuroscience Methods, vol. 173, pp. 140-146, 2008.
[11] A.A. Gooch and P. Willemsen, "Evaluating Space Perception in NPR Immersive Environments," Proc. Symp. Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, pp. 105-110, 2002.
[12] M.A. Hagen, R.K. Jones, and E. Reed, "On a Neglected Variable in Theories of Pictorial Perception: Truncation of the Visual Field," Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 23, pp. 326-330, 1978.
[13] S. Hassan, J. Hicks, L. Hao, and K. Turano, "What is the Minimum Field of View Required for Efficient Navigation," Vision Research, vol. 47, no. 16, pp. 2115-2123, 2007.
[14] C. Hendrix and W. Barfield, "Presence within Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual Display Parameters," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 274-289, 1996.
[15] C. Hendrix and W. Barfield, "Perceptual Biases in Spatial Judgements as a Function of Eyepoint Elevation Angle and Geometric Field of View," Proc. European Symp. Space Environment Control Systems, vol. 3, pp. 87-109, 2000.
[16] V. Interrante, B. Ries, J. Lindquist, and L. Anderson, "Elucidating the Factors that Can Facilitate Veridical Spatial Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Conf., pp. 11-18, 2007.
[17] S.E.M. Jansen, A. Toet, and N.J. Delleman, "Effects of Horizontal Field-of-View Restriction on Manoeuvring Performance through Complex Structured Environments," Proc. Fifth Symp. Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pp. 189-189, 2008.
[18] L. Kjelldahl and M. Prime, "A Study on How Depth Perception is Affected by Different Presentation Methods of 3D Objects on a 2D Display," Computers & Graphics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 199-202, 1995.
[19] J. Knapp and J. Loomis, "Limited Field of View of Head-Mounted Displays is not the Cause of Distance Underestimation in Virtual Environments," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 572-577, 2004.
[20] S. Kuhl, W. Thompson, and S. Creem-Regehr, "Minification Influences Spatial Judgments in Virtual Environments," Proc. Symp. Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pp. 15-19, 2006.
[21] S. Kuhl, W. Thompson, and S. Creem-Regehr, "HMD Calibration and Its Effects on Distance Judgments," Proc. Fifth Symp. Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 2008.
[22] S.A. Kuhl, W.B. Thompson, and S.H. Creem-Regehr, "HMD Calibration and Its Effects on Distance Judgments," ACM Trans. Applied Perception, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1-20, 2009.
[23] J.M. Loomis and J.M. Knapp, "Visual Perception of Egocentric Distance in Real and Virtual Environments," Virtual and Adaptive Environments, pp. 21-46, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. 2003.
[24] E. McGarrity and M. Tuceryan, "A Method for Calibrating See-Through Head-Mounted Displays for AR," IEEE Proc. Int'l Workshop Augmented Reality, pp. 75-84, 1999.
[25] M. McGreevy, C. Ratzlaff, and S. Ellis, "Virtual Space and Two-Dimensional Effects in Perspective Displays," Proc. 21st Ann. Conf. Manual Control, 1985.
[26] R. Messing and F.H. Durgin, "Distance Perception and the Visual Horizon in Head-Mounted Displays," ACM Trans. Applied Perception, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 234-250, 2005.
[27] J. Murray, "Some Perspectives on Visual Depth Perception," ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, Special Issue on Interactive Entertainment Design, Implementation and Adrenaline, vol. 28, pp. 155-157, 1994.
[28] D.C. Neale, "Spatial Perception in Desktop Virtual Environments," Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 1117-1121, 1996.
[29] K. Nemire and S. Ellis, "Calibration and Evaluation of Virtual Environment Displays," Proc. IEEE Symp. Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality, pp. 33-40, 1993.
[30] J. Psotka, S.A. Lewis, and D. King, "Effects of Field of View on Judgments of Self-Location: Distortions in Distance Estimations Even When the Image Geometry Exactly Fits the Field of View," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 352-369, 1998.
[31] E. Rinalducci, D. Mapes, S. Cinq-Mars, and K. Higgins, "Determining the Field of View in HMDs: A Psychophysical Method," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 353-356, 1996.
[32] J. Rolland, W. Gibson, and D. Ariely, "Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in Virtual Environments," Presence, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 24-48, 1995.
[33] C. Rosenberg and W. Barfield, "Estimation of Spatial Distortion as a Function of Geometric Parameters of Perspective," IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1323-1333, Sept. 1995.
[34] A.F. Seay, D.M. Krum, L. Hodges, and W. Ribarsky, "Simulator Sickness and Presence in a High Field-of-View Virtual Environment," Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 784-785, 2002.
[35] D. Shreiner, OpenGL Programming Guide: The Official Guide to Learning OpenGL, Versions 3.0 and 3.1, (7th Edition). Addison-Wesley, 2009.
[36] K.M. Stanney and R.S. Kennedy, "The Psychometrics of Cybersickness," Comm. ACM, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 66-68, 1997.
[37] F. Steinicke, G. Bruder, S. Kuhl, P. Willemsen, M. Lappe, and K. Hinrichs, "Judgment of Natural Perspective Projections in Head-Mounted Display Environments," Proc. ACM Symp. Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), pp. 35-42, 2009.
[38] W.B. Thompson, P. Willemsen, A.A. Gooch, S.H. Creem-Regehr, J.M. Loomis, and A.C. Beall, "Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter When Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments?" Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 560-571, 2004.
[39] M. Usoh, E. Catena, S. Arman, and M. Slater, "Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 497-503, 1999.
[40] R. Warren and A.H. Wertheim, Perception & Control of Self-Motion. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1990.
[41] P. Willemsen, M.B. Colton, S. Creem-Regehr, and W.B. Thompson, "The Effects of Head-Mounted Display Mechanical Properties and Field-of-View on Distance Judgments in Virtual Environments," ACM Trans. Applied Perception, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1-14, 2009.
[42] P. Willemsen and A.A. Gooch, "Perceived Egocentric Distances in Real, Image-Based, and Traditional Virtual Environments," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 275-276, 2002.
[43] B.G. Witmer and P.B. Kline, "Judging Perceived and Traversed Distance in Virtual Environments," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 144-167, 1998.
[44] B.G. Witmer and J.W. Sadowski, "Nonvisually Guided Locomotion to a Previously Viewed Target in Real and Virtual Environments," Human Factors, vol. 40, no. i3, pp. 489-484, 1998.
[45] U. Yang and G.J. Kim, "Increasing the Effective Egocentric Field of View with Proprioceptive and Tactile Feedback," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 27-34, 2004.
17 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool