The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - November/December (2010 vol.16)
pp: 1587-1594
ABSTRACT
In flow simulations the behavior and properties of particle trajectories often depend on the physical geometry containedin the simulated environment. Understanding the flow in and around the geometry itself is an important part of analyzing the data.Previous work has often utilized focus+context rendering techniques, with an emphasis on showing trajectories while simplifyingor illustratively rendering the physical areas. Our research instead emphasizes the local relationship between particle paths andgeometry by using a projected multi-field visualization technique. The correlation between a particle path and its surrounding areais calculated on-the-fly and displayed in a non-intrusive manner. In addition, we support visual exploration and comparative analysisthrough the use of linked information visualization, such as manipulatable curve plots and one-on-one similarity plots. Our techniqueis demonstrated on particle trajectories from a groundwater simulation and a computer room airflow simulation, where the flow ofparticles is highly influenced by the dense geometry.
INDEX TERMS
flow visualization, multi-field visualization, focus+context visualization, coordinated linked views
CITATION
Chad Jones, Kwan-Liu Ma, "Visualizing Flow Trajectories Using Locality-based Rendering and Warped Curve Plots", IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, vol.16, no. 6, pp. 1587-1594, November/December 2010, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2010.218
REFERENCES
[1] H. Doleisch, M. Gasser, and H. Hauser, Interactive feature specification for focus+context visualization of complex simulation data. In VisSym, 2003.
[2] H. Doleisch, M. Mayer, M. Gasser, P. Priesching, and H. Hauser, Interactive feature specification for simulation data on time-varying grids. In SimVis, pages 291–304, 2005.
[3] C. Hurter, B. Tissoires, and S. Conversy, Fromdady: Spreading aircraft trajectories across views to support iterative queries. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15: 1017–1024, 2009.
[4] Z. Konyha, K. Matkovic, D. Gracanin, M. Jelovic, and H. Hauser, Interactive visual analysis of families of function graphs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12: 1373–1385, 2006.
[5] Z. Konyha, K. Matkovic, and H. Hauser, Interactive visual analysis in engineering: A survey. In Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, pages 31–38, 2009.
[6] O. D. Lampe, C. Correa, K.-L. Ma, and H. Hauser, Curve-centric volume reformation for comparative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15: 1235–1242, 2009.
[7] R. S. Laramee, C. Garth, H. Doleisch, J. Schneider, H. Hauser, and H. Ha-gen, Visual analysis and exploration of fluid flow in a cooling jacket. IEEE Visualization Conference, 0: 79, 2005.
[8] R. S. Laramee, J. J. van Wijk, B. Jobard, and H. Hauser, Isa and ibfvs: Image space-based visualization of flow on surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphic, 10 (6): 637–648, 2004.
[9] C. Ledergerber, G. Guennebaud, M. Meyer, M. Bacher, and H. Pfister, Volume mls ray casting. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14 (6): 1539–1546, 2008.
[10] K. Matkovic, W. Freiler, D. Gracanin, and H. Hauser, Comvis: a coordinated multiple views system for prototyping new visualization technology. In International Conference Information Visualisation, 2008.
[11] K. Matkovic, D. Gracanin, Z. Konyha, and H. Hauser, Color lines view: An approach to visualization of families of function graphs. International Conference on Information Visualization, pages 59–64, 2007.
[12] T. McLoughlin, R. S. Laramee, R. Peikert, F. H. Post, and M. Chen, Over Two Decades of Integration-Based, Geometric Flow Visualization. In EuroGraphics, pages 73–92, 2009.
[13] B. Palmer, V. Gurumoorthi, A. M. Tartakovsky, and T. D. Scheibe, A component-based framework for smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of reactive fluid flow in porous media. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 2010.
[14] Z. Peng and R. S. Laramee, Vector glyphs for surfaces: A fast and simple glyph placement algorithm for adaptive resolution meshes. In Proceedings of Vision, Modeling, and Visualization, pages 61–70, 2008.
[15] Z. Peng and R. S. Laramee, Higher Dimensional Vector Field Visualization: A Survey. In Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics, 2009.
[16] K. Shi, H. Theisel, H. Hauser, T. Weinkauf, K. Matkovic, H.-C. Hege, and H.-P. Seidel, Path line attributes - an information visualization approach to analyzing the dynamic behavior of 3D time-dependent flow fields. In Topology-Based Methods in Visualization II, pages 75–88, 2009.
[17] B. Spencer, R. S. Laramee, G. Chen, and E. Zhang, Evenly spaced streamlines for surfaces: An image-based approach. Computer Graphics Forum, 28 (6): 1618–1631, 2009.
[18] A. M. Tartakovsky, P. Meakin, T. D. Scheibe, and B. D. Wood, A smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for reactive transport and mineral precipitation in porous and fractured porous media. Water Resources Research, 43 (5), 2007.
[19] N. Willems, H. van de Wetering, and J. J. van Wijk, Multivariate trajectory selection. Workshop on Behavior Monitoring and Interpretation, 2009.
[20] P. C. Wong and R. D. Bergeron, 30 years of multidimensional multivariate visualization. In Scientific Visualization, Overviews, Methodologies, and Techniques, pages 3-33. IEEE Computer Society, 1997.
22 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool