This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
A Unified Paradigm For Scalable Multi-Projector Displays
November/December 2007 (vol. 13 no. 6)
pp. 1360-1367
We present a general framework for the modeling and optimization of scalable multi-projector displays. Based on this framework, we derive algorithms that can robustly optimize the visual quality of an arbitrary combination of projectors without manual adjustment. When the projectors are tiled, we show that our framework automatically produces blending maps that outperform state-of-the-art projector blending methods. When all the projectors are superimposed, the framework can produce high-resolution images beyond the Nyquist resolution limits of component projectors. When a combination of tiled and superimposed projectors are deployed, the same framework harnesses the best features of both tiled and superimposed multi-projector projection paradigms. The framework creates for the first time a new unified paradigm that is agnostic to a particular configuration of projectors yet robustly optimizes for the brightness, contrast, and resolution of that configuration. In addition, we demonstrate that our algorithms support high resolution video at real-time interactive frame rates achieved on commodity graphics platforms. This work allows for inexpensive, compelling, flexible, and robust large scale visualization systems to be built and deployed very efficiently.

[1] M. Brown, A. Majumder, and R. Yang, Camera-based calibration techniques for seamless multiprojector displays. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics, 11: 193–206, Mar. 2005.
[2] N. L. Chang, Efficient dense correspondences using temporally encoded light patterns. In Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Systems (ProCams), Nice, France, Oct. 2003.
[3] N. L. Chang, Creating interactive 3-D media with projector-camera system. In Proc. SPIE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference (VCIP), volume 5308, pages 850–861, San Jose, CA, Jan. 2004.
[4] N. L. Chang, N. Damera-Venkata, J. M. DiCarlo, and S. H. Lim, Camera-based measurement for projector-camera systems. Technical report, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, In preparation.
[5] N. Damera-Venkata and N. L. Chang, Display supersampling. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, 2007. Accepted with revisions.
[6] N. Damera-Venkata and N. L. Chang, On the resolution limits of superimposed projection. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), San Antonio, TX, Sept. 2007.
[7] N. Damera-Venkata and N. L. Chang, Realizing super-resolution with superimposed projection. In Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Systems (ProCams), Minneapolis, MN, June 2007.
[8] R. Fattal, D. Lischinski, and M. Werman, Gradient domain high dynamic range image compression. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 249–256, San Antonio, TX, July 2002.
[9] M. Harville, B. Culbertson, I. Sobel, D. Gelb, A. Fitzhugh, and D. Tanguay, Practical methods for geometric and photometric correction of tiled projector displays on curved surfaces. In Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Systems (ProCams), pages 52–59, New York, USA, June 2006.
[10] A. K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
[11] C. Jaynes and D. Ramakrishnan, Super-resolution composition in multiprojector displays. In Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Systems (ProCams), Nice, France, Oct. 2003.
[12] A. Levin, A. Zomet, S. Peleg, and Y. Weiss, Seamless image stitching in the gradient domain. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 377–389, Prague, CZ, May 2004.
[13] A. Majumder, Contrast enhancement of multi-displays using human contrast sensitivity. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 377–382, San Diego, USA, June 2005.
[14] A. Majumder, Is spatial super-resolution feasible using overlapping projectors? In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 209–212, Philadelphia, USA, Mar. 2005.
[15] A. Majumder and R. Stevens, Color nonuniformity in projection-based displays: Analysis and solutions. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics, 10: 177–188, Mar. 2004.
[16] A. Majumder and R. Stevens, Perceptual photometric seamlessness in tiled projection-based displays. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 24: 111–134, Jan. 2005.
[17] P. Perez, M. Gagnet, and A. Blake, Poisson image editing. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 313–318, San Diego, CA, July 2003.
[18] R. Raskar, M. Brown, R. Yang, W. Chen, G. Welch, H. Towles, B. Seales, and H. Fuchs, Multi-projector displays using camera-based registration. In Proc. Visualization, pages 161–522, San Francisco, USA, Oct. 1999.
[19] M. Stone, Color and brightness appearance issues in tiled displays. IEEE Comp. Graphics and Applications, 21: 58–66, Sept. 2001.
[20] R. Surati, Scalable Self-Calibrating Display Technology for Seamless Large-Scale Displays. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Jan. 1999.
[21] P. Wesseling, An Introduction to Multigrid Methods. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 1992.
[22] A. Zomet, A. Levin, S. Peleg, and Y. Weiss, Seamless image stitching by minimizing false edges. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 15: 969–977, Apr. 2006.

Index Terms:
Multi-projector displays, tiled displays, large format displays, blending, stitching, automatic geometric alignment, photometric correction, super-resolution, superimposed projection.
Citation:
Niranjan Damera-Venkata, Nelson Chang, Jeffrey Dicarlo, "A Unified Paradigm For Scalable Multi-Projector Displays," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1360-1367, Nov.-Dec. 2007, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2007.70536
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.