The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.11 - November (2009 vol.20)
pp: 1567-1585
Peter M. Musial , Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey
Chryssis Georgiou , University of Cyprus, Nicosia
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a new algorithm for a reconfigurable distributed domain-oriented atomic object service, called DO-RAMBO, which stands for Domain-Oriented Reconfigurable Atomic Memory for Basic Objects. This service is suitable for inclusion as a middleware system service for distributed applications requiring atomic read/write data. The implementation substantially extends and refines the abstract RAMBO algorithm of Lynch and Shvartsman that supports individual atomic objects. In this paper, domains are introduced to allow the users to group related atomic objects. The new implementation manages configurations on the basis of domains, significantly improving the utility and the performance of the resulting service. DO-RAMBO guarantees consistency under asynchrony, message loss, node crashes, new node arrivals, and node departures. We present the formal algorithm development for DO-RAMBO and give analytical and empirical results that illustrate the benefit of the new approach.
INDEX TERMS
Distributed systems, specifying and verifying and reasoning about programs, algorithm and design analysis, reliability and robustness.
CITATION
Peter M. Musial, Chryssis Georgiou, "Developing a Consistent Domain-Oriented Distributed Object Service", IEEE Transactions on Parallel & Distributed Systems, vol.20, no. 11, pp. 1567-1585, November 2009, doi:10.1109/TPDS.2008.243
REFERENCES
[1] N. Lynch and A. Shvartsman, “RAMBO: A Reconfigurable Atomic Memory Service for Dynamic Networks,” Proc. 16th Int'l Symp. Distributed Computing (DISC '02), pp. 173-190, 2002.
[2] S. Gilbert, N. Lynch, and A. Shvartsman, “RAMBO II: Rapidly Reconfigurable Atomic Memory for Dynamic Networks,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN '03), pp. 259-268, 2003.
[3] S. Gilbert, N. Lynch, and A. Shvartsman, “RAMBO: A Robust, Reconfigurable Atomic Memory Service for Dynamic Networks,” technical report, MIT, CSAIL, 2008.
[4] C. Georgiou, P. Musial, and A. Shvartsman, “Long-Lived RAMBO: Trading Knowledge for Communication,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 383, no. 1, pp. 59-85, Sept. 2007.
[5] N. Lynch and M. Tuttle, “Hierarchical Correctness Proofs for Distributed Algorithms,” Proc. Sixth ACM Symp. Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC '87), pp. 137-151, 1987.
[6] N. Lynch, Distributed Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.
[7] P. Musial and A. Shvartsman, “Implementing a Reconfigurable Atomic Memory Service for Dynamic Networks,” Proc. 18th Int'l Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp. (IPDPS), 2004.
[8] D. Gifford, “Weighted Voting for Replicated Data,” Proc. Seventh ACM Symp. Operating Systems Principles (SOSP '79), pp. 150-162, 1979.
[9] R. Thomas, “A Majority Consensus Approach to Concurrency Control for Multiple Copy Databases,” ACM Trans. Database Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 180-209, June 1979.
[10] E. Upfal and A. Wigderson, “How to Share Memory in a Distributed System,” J. ACM, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 116-127, Jan. 1987.
[11] B. Awerbuch and P. Vitanyi, “Atomic Shared Register Access by Asynchronous Hardware,” Proc. 27th IEEE Symp. Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS '86), pp. 233-243, 1986.
[12] H. Attiya, A. Bar-Noy, and D. Dolev, “Sharing Memory Robustly in Message Passing Systems,” J. ACM, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 124-142, Jan. 1995.
[13] B. Englert and A. Shvartsman, “Graceful Quorum Reconfiguration in a Robust Emulation of Shared Memory,” Proc. 20th IEEE Int'l Conf. Distributed Computer Systems (ICDCS '00), pp.454-463, 2000.
[14] N. Lynch and A. Shvartsman, “Robust Emulation of Shared Memory Using Dynamic Quorum-Acknowledged Broadcasts,” Proc. 27th IEEE Int'l Fault-Tolerant Computing Symp. (FTCS '97), pp.272-281, 1997.
[15] K. Birman and T. Joseph, “Exploiting Virtual Synchrony in Distributed Systems,” Proc. 11th ACM Symp. Operating Systems Principles (SOSP '87), Dec. 1987.
[16] Comm. ACM, special issue on group communication services, vol.39, no. 4, 1996.
[17] L. Lamport, “The Part-Time Parliament,” ACM Trans. Computer Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 133-169, 1998.
13 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool