This Article 
 Bibliographic References 
 Add to: 
Advances in IC-Scheduling Theory: Scheduling Expansive and Reductive Dags and Scheduling Dags via Duality
November 2007 (vol. 18 no. 11)
pp. 1607-1617
Earlier work has developed the underpinnings of IC-Scheduling Theory, a frame- work for scheduling computations having intertask dependencies|modeled via dags- for Internet-based computing. The goal of the schedules produced is to render tasks eligible for execution at the maximum possible rate, with the dual aim of: (a) utiliz- ing remote clients' computational resources well, by always having work to allocate to an available client; (b) lessening the likelihood of a computation's stalling for lack of eligible tasks. The dags handled by the Theory thus far are those that can be decomposed into a given collection of bipartite building-block dags via the operation of dag-decomposition. A basic tool in constructing schedules is a relation B, which allows one to "prioritize" the scheduling of a complex dag's building blocks. The current paper extends IC-Scheduling Theory in two ways: by expanding significantly the repertoire of dags that the Theory can schedule optimally, and by allowing one sometimes to shortcut the algorithmic process required to find optimal schedules. The expanded repertoire now allows the Theory to schedule optimally, among other dags, a large range of dags that are either "expansive," in the sense that they grow outward from their sources, or "reductive," in the sense that they grown inward toward their sinks. The algorithmic shortcuts allow one to "read off" an optimal schedule for a dag from a given optimal schedule for the dag's dual, which is obtained by reversing all arcs (thereby exchanging the roles of sources and sinks).

[1] R. Buyya, D. Abramson, and J. Giddy, “A Case for Economy Grid Architecture for Service-Oriented Grid Computing,” Proc. 10th Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (HCW '01), 2001.
[2] W. Cirne and K. Marzullo, “The Computational Co-Op: Gathering Clusters into a Metacomputer,” Proc. 13th Int'l Parallel Processing Symp. (IPPS '99), pp. 160-166, 1999.
[3] Condor Project, Univ. of Wisconsin, http://www.cs.wisc.educondor, 2007.
[4] G. Cordasco, G. Malewicz, and A.L. Rosenberg, “Extending IC-Scheduling Theory via the Sweep Algorithm,” Univ. of Massachusetts, 2007, submitted for publication.
[5] G. Cordasco, G. Malewicz, and A.L. Rosenberg, “Applying IC-Scheduling Theory to Some Familiar Computations,” Proc. Workshop Large-Scale, Volatile Desktop Grids (PCGrid '07), 2007.
[6] T.H. Cormen, C.E. Leiserson, R.L. Rivest, and C. Stein, Introduction to Algorithms, second ed. MIT Press, 1999.
[7] I. Foster and C. Kesselman, eds., The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, second ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2004.
[8] I. Foster, C. Kesselman, and S. Tuecke, “The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations,” Int'l J. Supercomputer Applications, 2001.
[9] L. Gao and G. Malewicz, “Toward Maximizing the Quality of Results of Dependent Tasks Computed Unreliably,” Theory of Computing Systems, to appear, 2007.
[10] R. Hall, A.L. Rosenberg, and A. Venkataramani, “A Comparison of Dag-Scheduling Strategies for Internet-Based Computing,” Proc. 22nd Int'l Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp. (IPDPS), 2007.
[11] H.T. Hsu, “An Algorithm for Finding a Minimal Equivalent Graph of a Digraph,” J. ACM, vol. 22, pp. 11-16, 1975.
[12] D. Kondo, H. Casanova, E. Wing, and F. Berman, “Models and Scheduling Mechanisms for Global Computing Applications,” Proc. 16th Int'l Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp. (IPDPS '02), 2002.
[13] E. Korpela, D. Werthimer, D. Anderson, J. Cobb, and M. Lebofsky, “SETI@home: Massively Distributed Computing for SETI,” P.F.Dubois, ed., Computing in Science and Eng., IEEE CS Press, 2000.
[14] G. Malewicz, I. Foster, A.L. Rosenberg, and M. Wilde, “A Tool for Prioritizing DAGMan Jobs and Its Evaluation,” J. Grid Computing, vol 5., no. 2, pp.197-212, 2007.
[15] G. Malewicz and A.L. Rosenberg, “On Batch-Scheduling Dags for Internet-Based Computing,” Proc. 11th Euro-Par Conf. (Euro-Par'05), pp. 262-271, 2005.
[16] G. Malewicz, A.L. Rosenberg, and M. Yurkewych, “Toward a Theory for Scheduling Dags in Internet-Based Computing,” IEEE Trans. Computing, vol. 55, pp. 757-768, 2006.
[17] M. Mitchell, “Creating Minimal Vertex Series Parallel Graphs from Directed Acyclic Graphs,” Proc. Australasian Symp. Information Visualisation ( '04), pp. 133-139, 2004.
[18] A.L. Rosenberg, “On Scheduling Mesh-Structured Computations for Internet-Based Computing,” IEEE Trans. Computing, vol. 53, pp. 1176-1186, 2004.
[19] A.L. Rosenberg and M. Yurkewych, “Guidelines for Scheduling Some Common Computation-Dags for Internet-Based Computing,” IEEE Trans. Computing, vol. 54, pp. 428-438, 2005.
[20] X.-H. Sun and M. Wu, “GHS: A Performance Prediction and Node Scheduling System for Grid Computing,” Proc. 17th IEEE Int'l Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp. (IPDPS '03), 2003.

Index Terms:
IC-Scheduling theory, Internet-based computing, Grid computing, Global computing, Scheduling dags, Theory
Gennaro Cordasco, Grzegorz Malewicz, Arnold Rosenberg, "Advances in IC-Scheduling Theory: Scheduling Expansive and Reductive Dags and Scheduling Dags via Duality," IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1607-1617, Nov. 2007, doi:10.1109/TPDS.2007.1067
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.