The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.07 - July (2012 vol.61)
pp: 939-953
Andrea Acquaviva , Politecnico di Torino, TORINO
Francesco Paterna , University of Bologna, Bologna
Francesco Papariello , ST Microelectronics, Cornaredo
Giuseppe Desoli , ST Microelectronics, Cornaredo
Luca Benini , University of Bologna, Bologna
Multimedia streaming applications running on next-generation parallel multiprocessor arrays in sub-45 nm technology face new challenges related to device and process variability, leading to performance and power variations across the cores. In this context, Quality of Service (QoS), as well as energy efficiency, could be severely impacted by variability. In this work, we propose a runtime variability-aware workload distribution technique for enhancing real-time predictability and energy efficiency based on an innovative Linear-Programming + Bin-Packing formulation which can be solved in linear time. We demonstrate our approach on the virtual prototype of a next-generation industrial multicore platform running representative multimedia applications. Experimental results confirm that our technique compensates variability, while improving energy-efficiency and minimizing deadline violations in presence of performance and power variations across the cores. The proposed policy can save up to 33 percent of energy with respect to the state-of-the-art policies and 65 percent of energy with respect to one variability-unaware task allocation policy while providing better QoS.
Software/software engineering, operating systems, organization and design, real-time systems and embedded systems.
Andrea Acquaviva, Francesco Paterna, Francesco Papariello, Giuseppe Desoli, Luca Benini, "Variability-Aware Task Allocation for Energy-Efficient Quality of Service Provisioning in Embedded Streaming Multimedia Applications", IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol.61, no. 7, pp. 939-953, July 2012, doi:10.1109/TC.2011.127
[1] A. Acquaviva, L. Benini, and B. Riccò, “Software-Controlled Processor Speed Setting for Low-Power Streamingmultimedia,” IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1283-1292, Nov. 2001.
[2] B. Bilgic, B. Horn, and I. Masaki, “Efficient Integral Image Computation on the GPU,” Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., pp. 528-533, 2010.
[3] K.A. Bowman, A.R. Alameldeen, S.T. Srinivasan, and C.B. Wilkerson, “Impact of Die-to-Die and within-Die Parameter Variations on the Throughput Distribution of Multi-Core Processors,” Proc. ACM/IEEE Int'l Symp. Low Power Electronics and Design, pp. 50-55, 2007.
[4] Y. Cao and C. McAndrew, “Mosfet Modeling for 45 nm and Beyond,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer-Aided Design, pp. 638-643, 2007.
[5] S. Chandra, K. Lahiri, A. Raghunathan, and S. Dey, “System-on-Chip Power Management Considering Leakage Power Variations,” Proc. ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conf., pp. 877-882, 2007.
[6] A. Drake, R. Senger, H. Singh, G. Carpenter, and N. James, “Dynamic Measurement of Critical-Path Timing,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Integrated Circuit Design and Technology and Tutorial, pp. 249-252, 2008.
[7] S. Eyerman and L. Eeckhout, “A Counter Architecture for Online dvfs Profitability Estimation,” IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1576-1583, Nov. 2010.
[8] P. Faraboschi, G. Brown, J.A. Fisher, G. Desoli, and F. Homewood, “Lx: A Technology Platform for Customizable Vliw Embedded Processing,” Proc. Conf. Int'l Symp. Computer Architecture, pp. 203-213, 2000.
[9] E. Flamand, “Strategic Directions Toward Multicore Application Specific Computing,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, p. 1266, 2009.
[10] B.G. Haskell, A. Puri, and A.N. Netravali, Digital Video: An Introduction to MPEG-2. Chapman & Hall, Ltd., 1996.
[11] S. Herbert and D. Marculescu, “Characterizing Chip-Multiprocessor Variability-Tolerance,” Proc. ACM Conf. Design Automation Conf., pp. 313-318, 2008.
[12] S. Hong, S. Narayanan, and M. Kandemir, “Process Variation Aware Thread Mapping for Chip Multiprocessors,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 821-826, 2009.
[13] L. Huang and Q. Xu, “Energy-Efficient Task Allocation and Scheduling for Multi-Mode Mpsocs under Lifetime Reliability Constraint,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Design, Automation, and Test in Europe, pp. 1584-1589, 2010.
[14] L. Huang, F. Yuan, and Q. Xu, “Lifetime Reliability-Aware Task Allocation and Scheduling for mpsoc Platforms,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 51-56, 2009.
[15] E. Humenay, D. Tarjan, and K. Skadron, “Impact of Process Variations on Multicore Performance Symmetry,” Proc. Conf. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 1653-1658, 2007.
[16] H. Jeon, W.H. Lee, and S.W. Chung, “Load Unbalancing Strategy for Multi-Core Embedded Processors,” IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 1434-1440, Oct. 2010.
[17] MPEG Video Compression Standard, J.L. Mitchell, W.B. Pennebaker, C.E. Fogg, and D.J. Legall, eds. Chapman & Hall, Ltd., 1996.
[18] M. Mutyam, F. Wang, R. Krishnan, V. Narayanan, M. Kandemir, Y. Xie, and M.J. Irwin, “Process-Variation-Aware Adaptive Cache Architecture and Management,” IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 58, pp. 865-877, July 2009.
[19] P. Ndai, S. Bhunia, A. Agarwal, and K. Roy, “Within-Die Variation-Aware Scheduling in Superscalar Processors for Improved Throughput,” IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 940-951, July 2008.
[20] G. Palermo, C. Silvano, and V. Zaccaria, “Variability-Aware Robust Design Space Exploration of Chip Multiprocessor Architectures,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conf., pp. 323-328, 2009.
[21] A. Papanicolaou, M. Miranda, P. Marchal, B. Dierickx, and F. Catthoor, “At Tape-Out: Can System Yield in Terms of Timing/Energy Specifications Be Predicted?,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., pp. 773-778, 2007.
[22] F. Paterna, A. Acquaviva, F. Papariello, G. Desoli, and L. Benini, “Variability-Tolerant Workload Allocation for mpsoc Energy Minimization under Real-Time Constraints,” Proc. IEEE Workshop Embedded Systems for Real-Time Multimedia, pp. 134-142, 2009.
[23] F. Paterna, A. Acquaviva, F. Papariello, G. Desoli, M. Olivieri, and L. Benini, “Adaptive Idleness Distribution for Non-Uniform Aging Tolerance in Multiprocessor Systems-on-Chip,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 906-909, 2009.
[24] M. Pittau, A. Alimonda, S. Carta, and A. Acquaviva, “Impact of Task Migration on Streaming Multimedia for Embedded Multiprocessors: A Quantitative Evaluation,” Proc. IEEE Workshop Embedded Systems for Real-Time Multimedia, pp. 59-64, 2007.
[25] B. Rebaud, M. Belleville, E. Beigne, M. Robert, P. Maurine, and N. Azemard, “An Innovative Timing Slack Monitor for Variation Tolerant Circuits,” Proc. IEEE Conf. IC Design and Technology, pp. 215-218, 2009.
[26] L. Singhal and E. Bozorgzadeh, “Process Variation Aware System-Level Task Allocation Using Stochastic Ordering of Delay Distributions,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer-Aided Design, pp. 570-574, 2008.
[27] D. Sylvester, D. Blaauw, and E. Karl, “Elastic: An Adaptive Self-Healing Architecture for Unpredictable Silicon,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 484-490, June 2006.
[28] R. Teodorescu and J. Torrellas, “Variation-Aware Application Scheduling and Power Management for Chip Multiprocessors,” ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 363-374, 2008.
[29] A. Tiwari and J. Torrellas, “Facelift: Hiding and Slowing Down Aging in Multicores,” Proc. IEEE/ACM Int'l Symp. Microarchitecture, pp. 129-140, 2008.
[30] Vam—Variability Aware Modeling, ScientificReport/SR2007/ html1384291.html, 2011.
[31] N. Verghese, R. Rouse, and P. Hurat, “Predictive Models and CAD Methodology for Pattern Dependent Variability,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Asia and South Pacific Design Automation, pp. 213-218, 2008.
[32] F. Wang, C. Nicopoulos, X. Wu, Y. Xie, and N. Vijaykrishnan, “Variation-Aware Task Allocation and Scheduling for mpsoc,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer-Aided Design, pp. 598-603, 2007.
[33] L. Zhang, L.S. Bai, R.P. Dick, L. Shang, and R. Joseph, “Process Variation Characterization of Chip-Level Multiprocessors,” Proc. ACM Conf. Design Automation, pp. 694-697, 2009.
7 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool