|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
| | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Vijay Raghavan, "Weighted Diagnosis with Asymmetric Invalidation," IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1435-1438, December, 1996. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/12.545973, author = {Vijay Raghavan}, title = {Weighted Diagnosis with Asymmetric Invalidation}, journal ={IEEE Transactions on Computers}, volume = {45}, number = {12}, issn = {0018-9340}, year = {1996}, pages = {1435-1438}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/12.545973}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - JOUR JO - IEEE Transactions on Computers TI - Weighted Diagnosis with Asymmetric Invalidation IS - 12 SN - 0018-9340 SP1435 EP1438 EPD - 1435-1438 A1 - Vijay Raghavan, PY - 1996 KW - Asymmetric invalidation KW - weighted diagnosability KW - diagnosis KW - PMC model KW - BGM model. VL - 45 JA - IEEE Transactions on Computers ER - | |||
Abstract—Prior research has extended the classical PMC (or Symmetric Invalidation) Model to incorporate a priori weights or probabilities associated with units. We consider a similar extension to the BGM (or Asymmetric Invalidation) Model. In contrast to the PMC model, where deciding the weighted diagnosability number is co-NP complete, we show that the diagnosability number in the weighted BGM model can be obtained in O(
[1] M.A. Barborak, M. Malek, and A.T. Dahbura, "The Consensus Problem in Fault-Tolerant Computing," ACM Computer Surveys, vol. 25, pp. 171-220, June 1993.
[2] F. Barsi, F. Grandoni, and P. Maestrini, "A Theory of Diagnosability of Digital Systems," IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 585-593, June 1976.
[3] T.H. Cormen,C.E. Leiserson, and R.L. Rivest,Introduction to Algorithms.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press/McGraw-Hill, 1990.
[4] D. Coppersmith and S. Winograd, "Matrix Multiplication via Arithmetic Progression," J. Symb. Computers, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1-6, Mar. 1990.
[5] A.T. Dahbura, "An Efficient Algorithm for Identifying the Most Likely Fault Set in a Probabilistically Diagnosable System," IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 35, pp. 354-356, 1986.
[6] C.R. Kime, C.S. Holt, J.A. McPherson, and J.E. Smith, "Fault Diagnosis of Distributed Systems," Proc. Compsac, pp. 355-364, 1980.
[7] S.N. Maheshwari and S.L. Hakimi, "On Models for Diagnosable Systems and Probabilistic Fault Diagnosis," IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 25, pp. 228-236, Mar. 1976.
[8] G.G.L. Meyer, "A Diagnosis Algorithm for the BGM System-Level Fault Model," IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 756-758, Aug. 1976.
[9] F.P. Preparata, G. Metze, and R.T. Chien, "On the Connection Assignment Problem of Diagnosable Systems," IEEE Trans. Electronic Computers, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 848-854, Dec. 1967.
[10] V. Raghavan and A. Tripathi, "Improved Diagnosability Algorithms," IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 143-153, Feb. 1991.
[11] A.K. Somani and V.K. Agarwal, "Diagnosis in Hybrid Fault Situations Under AIM and a Unified t-Characterization Theorem," Computer Math. Applications, vol. 13, pp. 567-576, May-June 1987.
[12] G.F. Sullivan, "A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Fault Diagnosability," Proc. 25th Symp. Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 148-156, Oct. 1984.

