The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.09 - September (1994 vol.43)
pp: 994-1003
ABSTRACT
<p>Modern memory systems are composed of several levels of caching. The design of these levels is largely an empirical practice. One highly-effective empirical method is the single-pass method wherein all caches in a broad design space are evaluated in one pass over the trace. Multiprogramming degrades memory system performance since context switching reduces the effectiveness of cache memories. Few single-pass methods exist which account for multiprogramming effects. This paper uses a general model of single-pass algorithms, the recurrence/conflict model, and extends the model for recording the effects due to both voluntary context switches and involuntary context switches. Involuntary context switches are modeled using the distribution of lengths between a reference to an address and the re-reference to the same address. The paper makes the assumptions that involuntary context switches are equally likely to occur between each reference, and that one can independently estimate f/sub CS/, the fraction of a cache's contents flushed between context switches. The case where f/sub CS/=1 is used to measure the effect of worst-case context switch penalty (the susceptibility) of several members of the SPEC89 benchmark set to context switching. Some empirical results of F/sub CS/ are presented to illustrate the case where f/sub CS/>1. The model is validated against its assumptions by comparing its results with more restrictive methods.</p>
INDEX TERMS
multiprogramming; buffer storage; performance evaluation; memory architecture; program susceptibility; context switching; memory system performance degradation; cache memories; single-pass method; design space; multiprogramming; recurrence/conflict model; voluntary context switches; involuntary context switches; length distribution; address referencing; cache flushing; SPEC89 benchmarks; simulation; memory hierarchy; performance analysis.
CITATION
W.-m. W. Hwu, T.M. Conte, "Editorial", IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol.43, no. 9, pp. 994-1003, September 1994, doi:10.1109/12.312110
18 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool