This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
November 1979 (vol. 28 no. 11)
pp. 875
D.M. Chang, Radio Corporation of America
The theorem in question, Theorem 4, appears as an auxiliary part of a paper by Chang and Mott,1 whose main result was the presentation and justification of a new method for computing irredundant normal forms based on the concepts of abbreviated presence function, ratio function, and iterated consensus of prime implicants. The validity of the authors' method is unchallenged by the counterexample of Cutler and Muroga. Rather, their counterexample is intended only to question auxiliary Theorem 4, which attempts to specify new conditions for the absolute dispensability of prime implicants.
Citation:
D.M. Chang, T.H., Jr. Mott, "Author's Reply," IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 875, Nov. 1979, doi:10.1109/TC.1979.1675271
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.