The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - March (1979 vol.28)
pp: 257-258
J. En , Advanced Technology, Cubic Corporation
ABSTRACT
Without proof Paaske<sup>3</sup>states that "... En<sup>1</sup>cannot be true." Paaske's statement is based on his qualitative assumption that channel error is "much more likely" to occur than a hardware error in the decoder. The author will show that En's statements are still true under Paaske's assumption. Previous correspondence was cited by Paaske and claimed to be "the best way..." to judge a
INDEX TERMS
majority logic decoder, Catastrophic error propagation, convolution code, feedback decoder, infinite error propagation
CITATION
J. En, "Author's Reply<sup>2</sup>", IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol.28, no. 3, pp. 257-258, March 1979, doi:10.1109/TC.1979.1675330
19 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool