The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.01 - Jan.-Feb. (2013 vol.10)
pp: 151-160
Stefan Grunewald , CAS-MPG Partner Inst. for Comput. Biol., Shanghai, China
Andreas Spillner , Dept. of Math. & Comput. Sci., Univ. of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
Sarah Bastkowski , Sch. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Anja Bogershausen , Dept. of Math. & Comput. Sci., Univ. of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
Vincent Moulton , Sch. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Supertrees are a commonly used tool in phylogenetics to summarize collections of partial phylogenetic trees. As a generalization of supertrees, phylogenetic supernetworks allow, in addition, the visual representation of conflict between the trees that is not possible to observe with a single tree. Here, we introduce SuperQ, a new method for constructing such supernetworks (SuperQ is freely available at It works by first breaking the input trees into quartet trees, and then stitching these together to form a special kind of phylogenetic network, called a split network. This stitching process is performed using an adaptation of the QNet method for split network reconstruction employing a novel approach to use the branch lengths from the input trees to estimate the branch lengths in the resulting network. Compared with previous supernetwork methods, SuperQ has the advantage of producing a planar network. We compare the performance of SuperQ to the Z-closure and Q-imputation supernetwork methods, and also present an analysis of some published data sets as an illustration of its applicability.
Phylogeny, Vegetation, Computational biology, Bioinformatics, Visualization, Data visualization, Electronic mail,split network, Supertree, phylogenetic network, consensus network, supernetwork
Stefan Grunewald, Andreas Spillner, Sarah Bastkowski, Anja Bogershausen, Vincent Moulton, "SuperQ: Computing Supernetworks from Quartets", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol.10, no. 1, pp. 151-160, Jan.-Feb. 2013, doi:10.1109/TCBB.2013.8
[1] D. Bryant, “A Classification of Consensus Methods for Phylogenies,” BioConsensus, vol. 61, pp. 163-184, 2003.
[2] O.R.P. Bininda-Emonds, Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
[3] B. Holland and V. Moulton, “Consensus Networks: A Method for Visualising Incompatibilities in Collections of Trees,” Proc. Workshop Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI), pp. 165-176, 2003.
[4] D. Huson, T. Dezulian, T. Klöpper, and M. Steel, “Phylogenetic Super-Networks from Partial Trees,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 151-158, Oct.-Dec. 2004.
[5] D. Huson, R. Rupp, and C. Scornavacca, Phylogenetic Networks. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010.
[6] B. Holland, F. Delsuc, and V. Moulton, “Visualizing Conflicting Evolutionary Hypotheses in Large Collections of Trees: Using Consensus Networks to Study the Origins of Placentals and Hexapods,” Systematic Biology, vol. 54, pp. 66-76, 2005.
[7] M. Lysak, M. Koch, J. Beaulieu, A. Meister, and I. Leitch, “The Dynamic Ups and Downs of Genome Size Evolution in Brassicaceae,” Molecular Biology Evolution, vol. 26, pp. 85-98, 2009.
[8] H. Meudt, P. Lockhart, and D. Bryant, “Species Delimitation and Phylogeny of New Zealand Plant Species,” BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 9, article 111, 2009.
[9] J. Leigh, K. Schliep, P. Lopez, and E. Bapteste, “Let Them Fall Where They May: Congruence Analysis in Massive Phylogenetically Messy Data Sets,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, pp. 2773-2785, 2011.
[10] D. Huson, M. Steel, and J. Whitfield, “Reducing Distortion in Phylogenetic Networks,” Proc. Workshop Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI), pp. 150-161, 2006.
[11] J. Whitfield, S. Cameron, D. Huson, and M. Steel, “Filtered Z-Closure Supernetworks for Extracting and Visualizing Recurrent Signal from Incongruent Gene Trees,” Systematic Biology, vol. 57, pp. 939-947, 2008.
[12] B. Holland, G. Conner, K. Huber, and V. Moulton, “Imputing Supertrees and Supernetworks from Quartets,” Systematic Biology, vol. 56, pp. 57-67, 2007.
[13] H.-J. Bandelt and A. Dress, “Split Decomposition: A New and Useful Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis of Distance Data,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 1, pp. 242-252, 1992.
[14] D. Huson and D. Bryant, “Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary Studies,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 23, pp. 254-267, 2006.
[15] S. Grünewald, K. Forslund, A. Dress, and V. Moulton, “QNet: An Agglomerative Method for the Construction of Phylogenetic Networks from Weighted Quartets,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 24, pp. 532-538, 2007.
[16] S. Grünewald, V. Moulton, and A. Spillner, “Consistency of the QNet Algorithm for Generating Planar Split Graphs from Weighted Quartets,” Discrete Applied Math., vol. 157, pp. 2325-2334, 2009.
[17] D. Morrison, “Using Data-Display Networks for Exploratory Data Analysis in Phylogenetic Studies,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 27, pp. 1044-1057, 2010.
[18] S. Grünewald, A. Spillner, K. Forslund, and V. Moulton, “Constructing Phylogenetic Supernetworks from Quartets,” Proc. Workshop Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI), pp. 284-295, 2008.
[19] C. Semple and M. Steel, Phylogenetics. Oxford Univ. Press, 2003.
[20] A. Dress, K. Huber, J. Koolen, V. Moulton, and A. Spillner, Basic Phylogenetic Combinatorics. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012.
[21] P. Buneman, “The Recovery of Trees from Measures of Dissimilarity,” Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, F. Hodson et al., eds., Edinburgh Univ. Press, pp. 387-395, 1971.
[22] M. Brinkmeyer, T. Griebel, and S. Böcker, “Polynomial Supertree Methods Revisited,” Advances in Bioinformatics, vol. 2011, article 524182, 2011.
[23] Z. Dostál, Optimal Quadratic Programming Algorithms. Springer, 2009.
[24] H.-J. Bandelt and A. Dress, “A Canonical Decomposition Theory for Metrics on a Finite Set,” Advances in Math., vol. 92, pp. 47-105, 1992.
[25] A. Dress and D. Huson, “Constructing Split Graphs,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 109-115, July-Sept. 2004.
[26] D. Catanzaro, “The Minimum Evolution Problem: Overview and Classification,” Networks, vol. 53, pp. 112-125, 2009.
[27] J. Matoušek and B. Gärtner, Understanding and Using Linear Programming. Springer, 2007.
[28] M. Steel, “The Complexity of Reconstructing Trees from Qualitative Characters and Subtrees,” J. Classification, vol. 9, pp. 91-116, 1992.
[29] E. Harding, “The Probabilities of Rooted Tree-Shapes Generated by Random Bifurcation,” Advances in Applied Probability, vol. 3, pp. 44-77, 1971.
[30] G. Yule, “A Mathematical Theory of Evolution, Based on the Conclusions of Dr. J.C. Willis, F.R.S.” Philosophical Trans. R. Soc. London, Series B, vol. 213, pp. 21-87, 1925.
[31] B. Baum, “Combining Trees as a Way of Combining Data Sets for Phylogenetic Inference, and the Desirability of Combining Gene Trees,” Taxon, vol. 41, pp. 3-10, 1992.
[32] M. Ragan, “Phylogenetic Inference Based on Matrix Representation of Trees,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 1, pp. 53-58, 1992.
[33] E. Tepe, F. Farruggia, and L. Bohs, “A 10-Gene Phylogeny of Solanum section Herpystichum (Solanaceae) and a Comparison of Phylogenetic Methods,” Am. J. Botany, vol. 98, pp. 1356-1365, 2011.
[34] S. Joly, P. Heenan, and P. Lockhart, “A Pleistocene Intertribal Allopolyploidization Event Precedes the Species Radiation of Pachycladon (Brassicaceae) in New Zealand,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 51, pp. 365-372, 2009.
[35] B. Pryor and R. Gilbertson, “Molecular Phylogenetic Relationships Amongst Alternaria Species and Related Fungi Based upon Analysis of Nuclear ITS and mt SSU rDNA Sequences,” Mycological Research, vol. 104, pp. 1312-1321, 2000.
[36] B. Pryor and D. Bigelow, “Molecular Characterization of Embellisia and Nimbya Species and their Relationship to Alternaria, Ulocladium and Stemphylium,” Mycologia, vol. 95, pp. 1141-1154, 2003.
37 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool