The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - Nov.-Dec. (2012 vol.9)
pp: 1569-1581
Yang Tang , Res. Inst. of Intell. Control & Syst., Harbin Inst. of Technol., Harbin, China
Zidong Wang , Dept. of Inf. Syst. & Comput., Brunel Univ., Uxbridge, UK
Huijun Gao , Res. Inst. of Intell. Control & Syst., Harbin Inst. of Technol., Harbin, China
S. Swift , Dept. of Inf. Syst. & Comput., Brunel Univ., Uxbridge, UK
J. Kurths , Dept. of Transdisciplinary Concepts & Methods, Potsdam Inst. for Climate Impact Res., Potsdam, Germany
ABSTRACT
Controlling regions in cortical networks, which serve as key nodes to control the dynamics of networks to a desired state, can be detected by minimizing the eigenratio R and the maximum imaginary part σ of an extended connection matrix. Until now, optimal selection of the set of controlling regions is still an open problem and this paper represents the first attempt to include two measures of controllability into one unified framework. The detection problem of controlling regions in cortical networks is converted into a constrained optimization problem (COP), where the objective function R is minimized and σ is regarded as a constraint. Then, the detection of controlling regions of a weighted and directed complex network (e.g., a cortical network of a cat), is thoroughly investigated. The controlling regions of cortical networks are successfully detected by means of an improved dynamic hybrid framework (IDyHF). Our experiments verify that the proposed IDyHF outperforms two recently developed evolutionary computation methods in constrained optimization field and some traditional methods in control theory as well as graph theory. Based on the IDyHF, the controlling regions are detected in a microscopic and macroscopic way. Our results unveil the dependence of controlling regions on the number of driver nodes I and the constraint r. The controlling regions are largely selected from the regions with a large in-degree and a small out-degree. When r = + ∞, there exists a concave shape of the mean degrees of the driver nodes, i.e., the regions with a large degree are of great importance to the control of the networks when I is small and the regions with a small degree are helpful to control the networks when I increases. When r = 0, the mean degrees of the driver nodes increase as a function of I. We find that controlling σ is becoming more important in controlling a cortical network with increasing I. The methods and results of detecting controlling regions in this paper would promote the coordination and information consensus of various kinds of real-world complex networks including transportation networks, genetic regulatory networks, and social networks, etc.
INDEX TERMS
Controllability, Optimization, Complex networks, Evolutionary computation, Synchronization, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions,constrained optimization, Cortical networks, synchronization, controllability, evolutionary computation
CITATION
Yang Tang, Zidong Wang, Huijun Gao, S. Swift, J. Kurths, "A Constrained Evolutionary Computation Method for Detecting Controlling Regions of Cortical Networks", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol.9, no. 6, pp. 1569-1581, Nov.-Dec. 2012, doi:10.1109/TCBB.2012.124
REFERENCES
[1] A.L. Barabási and R. Albert, “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks,” Science, vol. 286, pp. 509-512, 1999.
[2] M. Piraveenan, M. Prokopenko, and A. Zomaya, “Assortative Mixing in Directed Biological Networks,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 66-78, Jan./Feb. 2012.
[3] Z. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Liu, J. Liang, and V. Vinciotti, “An Extended Kalman Filtering Approach to Modeling Nonlinear Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks via Short Gene Expression Time Series,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 410-419, July-Sept. 2009.
[4] T. Perkins and J. Hallett, “A Trade-Off between Sample Complexity and Computational Complexity in Learning Boolean Networks from Time-Series Data,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 118-125, Jan.-Mar. 2010.
[5] S. Mitra, R. Das, and Y. Hayashi, “Genetic Networks and Soft Computing,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 94-107, Jan./Feb. 2011.
[6] N. Noman and H. Iba, “Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks Using Differential Evolution with Local Search Heuristics,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 634-647, Oct.-Dec. 2007.
[7] A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001.
[8] A. Arenas, A. Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, “Synchronization in Complex Networks,” Physics Reports, vol. 469, pp. 93-153, 2008.
[9] A. Engel, P. Fries, and W. Singer, “Rapid Feature Selective Neuronal Synchronization through Correlated Latency Shifting,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 2, pp. 704-716, 2001.
[10] P. Uhlhaas and W. Singer, “Neural Synchrony in Brain Disorders: Relevance for Cognitive Dysfunctions and Pathophysiology,” Neuron, vol. 52, pp. 155-168, 2006.
[11] S. Schinkel, G. Zamora, O. Dimigen, W. Sommer, and J. Kurths, “Functional Network Analysis Reveals Differences in the Semantic Priming Task,” J. Neuroscience Methods, vol. 197, pp. 333-339, 2011.
[12] N. Kopell and B. Ermentrout, “Chemical and Electrical Synapses Perform Complementary Roles in the Synchronization of Interneuronal Networks,” Proc. Nat'l Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 101, pp. 15482-15487, 2004.
[13] E. Bullmore and O. Sporns, “Complex Brain Networks: Graph Theoretical Analysis of Structural and Functional Systems,” Nature Rev. Neuroscience, vol. 10, pp. 186-198, 2009.
[14] M. Rubinov and O. Sporns, “Complex Network Measures of Brain Connectivity: Uses and Interpretations,” NeuroImage, vol. 52, pp. 1059-1069, 2010.
[15] C. Zhou, L. Zemanová, G. Zamora, C. Hilgetag, and J. Kurths, “Hierarchical Organization Unveiled by Functional Connectivity in Complex Brain Networks,” Physical Rev. Letters, vol. 97, p. 238103, 2006.
[16] M. Muller, C. Hilgetag, and M. Hutt, “Organization of Excitable Dynamics in Hierarchical Biological Networks,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 4, p. e1000190, 2008.
[17] O. Sporns, C. Honey, and R. Kotter, “Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks,” Plos One, vol. 10, p. e1049, 2007.
[18] R. Morgan and I. Soltesz, “Nonrandom Connectivity of the Epileptic Dentate Gyrus Predicts a Major Role for Neuronal Hubs in Seizures,” Proc. Nat'l Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 105, pp. 6179-6184, 2008.
[19] G. Zamora, C. Zhou, and J. Kurths, “Cortical Hubs form a Module for Multisensory Integration on Top of the Hierarchy of Cortical Networks,” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, vol. 4, pp. 1-12, 2010.
[20] J. Gomez, G. Zamora, Y. Moreno, and A. Arenas, “From Modular to Centralized Organization of Synchronization in Functional Areas of the Cat Cerebral Cortex,” Plos one, vol. 5, p. e12313, 2010.
[21] F. Sorrentino, M. Bernardo, F. Garofalo, and G. Chen, “Controllability of Complex Networks via Pinning,” Physical Rev. E, vol. 75, p. 046103, 2007.
[22] Y. Liu, J. Slotine, and A. Barabasi, “Controllability of Complex Networks,” Nature, vol. 473, pp. 167-173, 2011.
[23] M. Egerstedt, “Degrees of Control,” Nature, vol. 473, pp. 158-159, 2011.
[24] X. Wang and G. Chen, “Synchronization in Scale-Free Dynamical Networks: Robustness and Fragility,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 54-62, Jan. 2002.
[25] W. Ren and R. Beard, Distributed Consensus in Multi-vehicle Cooperative Control, Communications and Control Engineering Series. Springer-Verlag, 2008.
[26] D.U. Hwang, M. Chavez, A. Amann, and S. Boccaletti, “Synchronization in Complex Networks with Age Ordering,” Physical Rev. Letter, vol. 94, p. 138701, 2005.
[27] S. Son, B. Kim, H. Hong, and H. Jeong, “Dynamics and Directionality in Complex Networks,” Physics Rev. Letters, vol. 103, p. 228702, 2009.
[28] X. Qian and E. Dougherty, “Intervention in Gene Regulatory Networks via Phenotypically Constrained Control Policies Based on Long-Run Behavior,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 123-136, Jan./Feb. 2012.
[29] W. Yu, G. Chen, and J. Lu, “On Pinning Synchronization of Complex Dynamical Networks,” Automatica, vol. 45, pp. 429-435, 2009.
[30] Y. Tang, Z.D. Wang, and J. Fang, “Controller Design for Synchronization of an Array of Delayed Neural Networks Using a Controllable Probabilistic Pso,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, pp. 4715-4732, 2011.
[31] Y. Tang, Z.D. Wang, W.K. Wong, J. Kurths, and J. Fang, “Multiobjective Synchronization of Coupled Systems,” Chaos, vol. 21, pp. 025114-1-025114-12, 2011.
[32] Z. Michalewicz and M. Schoenauer, “Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Parameter Optimization Problems,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 4, pp. 1-32, 1996.
[33] C. Coello, “Theoretical and Numerical Constraint-Handling Techniques Used with Evolutionary Algorithms: A Survey of the State of the Art,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Eng., vol. 191, pp. 1245-287, 2002.
[34] Z. Cai and Y. Wang, “A Multiobjective Optimization-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Optimization,” IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 658-75, Dec. 2006.
[35] Y. Wang and Z. Cai, “A Dynamic Hybrid Framework for Constrained Evolutionary Optimization,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 203-217, Feb. 2012.
[36] Y. Wang and Z. Cai, “Combining Multiobjective Optimization with Differential Evolution to Solve Constrained Optimization Problems,” IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 117-134, Feb. 2012.
[37] C. Hilgetag, G. Burns, M. O'eill, J. Scannell, and M. Young, “Anatomical Connectivity Defines the Organization of Clusters of Cortical Areas in the Macaque Monkey and the Cat,” Philosophical Trans. R Soc. London B, vol. 355, pp. 91-110, 2000.
[38] J. Zhou, J. Lu, and J. Lu, “Pinning Adaptive Synchronization of a General Complex Dynamical Network,” Automatica, vol. 44, pp. 996-1003, 2008.
[39] J. Restrepo, E. Ott, and B. Hunt, “Characterizing the Dynamical Importance of Network Nodes and Links,” Physical Rev. Letters, vol. 97, p. 094102, 2006.
[40] J. Brest, S. Greiner, B. Boskovic, M. Mernik, and V. Zumer, “Self-Adapting Control Parameters in Differential Evolution: A Comparative Study on Numerical Benchmark Problems,” IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 646-657, Dec. 2006.
[41] F. Sorrentino, “Effects of the Network Structural Properties on Its Controllability,” Chaos, vol. 17, p. 033101, 2007.
[42] J.Q. Zhang and A.C. Sanderson, “Jade: Adaptive Differential Evolution with Optional External Archive,” IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 945-958, Oct. 2009.
[43] A. Esmin and G. Lambert-Torres, “Application of Particle Swarm Optimization to Optimal Power Systems,” Int'l J. Innovative Computing Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 1705-1717, 2012.
[44] J. Pahasa and I. Ngamroo, “Pso Based Kernel Principal Component Analysis and Multi-Class Support Vector Machine for Power Quality Problem Classification,” Int'l J. Innovative Computing Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 1523-1540, 2012.
[45] J.Q. Lu, D.W.C. Ho, and L.G. Wu, “Exponential Stabilization in Switched Stochastic Dynamical Networks,” Nonlinearity, vol. 22, pp. 889-911, 2009.
[46] J.Q. Lu, D.W.C. Ho, and J.D. Cao, “A Unified Synchronization Criterion for Impulsive Dynamical Networks,” Automatica, vol. 46, pp. 1215-1221, 2010.
[47] Y. Tang, H. Gao, W. Zou, and J. Kurths, “Distributed Synchronization in Networks of Agent Systems with Nonlinearities and Random Switchings,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, accepted in 2012, doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2207718.
41 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool