The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - Fourth Quarter (2012 vol.3)
pp: 398-409
John P. Sullins , Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park
ABSTRACT
This paper will explore the ethical impacts of the use of affective computing by engineers and roboticists who program their machines to mimic and manipulate human emotions in order to evoke loving or amorous reactions from their human users. We will see that it does seem plausible that some people might buy a love machine if it were created, but it is argued here that principles from machine ethics have a role to play in the design of these machines. This is best achieved by applying what is known about the philosophy of love, the ethics of loving relationships, and the philosophical value of the erotic in the early design stage of building robust artificial companions. The paper concludes by proposing certain ethical limits on the manipulation of human psychology when it comes to building sex robots and in the simulation of love in such machines. In addition, the paper argues that the attainment of erotic wisdom is an ethically sound goal and that it provides more to loving relationships than only satisfying physical desire. This fact may limit the possibility of creating a machine that can fulfill all that one should want out of erotic love unless a machine can be built that would help its user attain this kind of love.
INDEX TERMS
Robots, Ethics, Human factors, Psychology, Behavioral science, robotics, Affective computing, artificial companions, artificial emotions
CITATION
John P. Sullins, "Robots, Love, and Sex: The Ethics of Building a Love Machine", IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol.3, no. 4, pp. 398-409, Fourth Quarter 2012, doi:10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.31
REFERENCES
[1] D. Levy, Love and Sex With Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. Harper Collins, 2007.
[2] R. Cowie, "Companionship Is an Emotional Business," Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues, Y. Wilks ed., John Benjamins Publishing Company, http://site.ebrary.com/lib/sonomaDoc?id =10383970&ppg =192 , 2010.
[3] B. Duffy, "Anthropomorphism and the Social Robot," Robotics and Automation Systems, vol. 42, pp. 177-190, 2003.
[4] C. Breazeal, A. Brooks, J. Gray, G. Hoffman, C. Kidd, H. Lee, J. Lieberman, A. Lockerd, and D. Mulanda, "Humanoid Robots as Cooperative Partners for People," http://web.media.mit.edu/~cynthiab/Papers Breazeal-etal-ijhr04.pdf. 2004.
[5] H.A. Samani, A.D. Cheok, M.J. Tharakan, J. Koh, and N. Fernando, "A Design Process for Lovotics," Proc. Third Int'l Conf. Human-Robot Personal Relationships, pp. 118-125, 2011.
[6] J.P. Sullins, "Friends by Design: A Design Philosophy for Personal Robotics Technology," Philosophy and Design: From Eng. to Architecture, P. Vermaas, P. Kroes, A. Light, and S. Moore, eds., pp. 143-158, Springer, 2008.
[7] T. Kanda and H. Ishiguro, "Communication Robots for Elementary Schools," http://www.irc.atr.jp/~kanda/pdfkanda-aisb2005.pdf . 2005.
[8] T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, and T. Ishida, "Psychological Analysis on Human-Robot Interaction," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 4166-4173, 2001.
[9] T. Kanda, R. Sato, N. Saiwaki, and H. Ishiguro, "Friendly Social Robot that Understands Human's Friendly Relationships," Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2215-2222, 2004.
[10] First Androids, http:/www.andydroid.com, 2012.
[11] True Companions, http:/www.truecompanion.com/, 2012.
[12] C. Meston and D. Buss, "Why Humans Have Sex," Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 36, pp. 477-507, 2007.
[13] J. Snell, "Sexbots: An Editorial," Psychology and Education: An Interdisciplinary J., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 49-50, 2005.
[14] S. Turkle, Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books, 2011.
[15] M. Coeckelbergh, "Personal Robots, Appearance, and Human Good: A Methodological Reflection on Roboethics," Int'l J. Social Robotics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 217-221, 2009.
[16] J. Sullins, "Friends by Design: A Design Philosophy for Personal Robotics Technology," Philosophy and Design: From Eng. to Architecture, P. Vermaas, P. Kroes, A. Light, and S. Moore, eds., pp. 143-158, Springer, 2008.
[17] A. Turing, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence," Mind, vol. 59, no. 236, pp. 433-460, 1950.
[18] B. Fehr, "Prototype Based Assessment of Laypeople's Views of Love," Personal Relationships, vol. 1, pp. 301-331, 1994.
[19] B. Fehr and J.A. Russel, "The Concept of Love Viewed from a Prototype Perspective," J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 60, pp. 424-438, 1991.
[20] D.T. Gilbert and E.E. Jones, "Perceiver-Induced Constraint: Interpretations of Self-Generated Reality" J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 50, pp. 269-280, 1986.
[21] A. Aron and E.N. Aron, "Love and Expansion of the Self: The State of the Model," Personal Relationships, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45-58, 1996.
[22] A. Aron, E.N. Aron, and D. Smollan, "Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness," J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 63, pp. 596-612, 1992.
[23] A. Aron, E.N. Aron, M. Tudor, and G. Nelson, "Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self," J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 60, pp. 241-253, 1991.
[24] A. Aron and B. Fraley, "Relationship Closeness as Including Other in the Self: Cognitive Underpinnings and Measures," Social Cognition, vol. 17, pp. 140-160, 1999.
[25] About the Continuous IOS, http://www.haverford.edu/psych/ble/continuous_ios index.html, 2012.
[26] F. Susan and R.S. Lazurus, "Coping as a Mediator of Emotion," J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 54, pp. 466-475, 1988.
[27] S. Ortigue and F. Bianchi-Demicheli, "Why Is Your Spouse So Predictable? Connecting Mirror Neuron System and Self-Expansion Model of Love," Medical Hypotheses, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 941-944, 2008.
[28] R. Buck, "The Genetics and Biology of True Love: Prosocial Biological Affects and the Left Hemisphere," Psychological Rev., vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 739-744, Oct. 2002.
[29] R. Buck and B.E. Ginsburg, "Emotional Communication and Altruism: The Cognitive Gene Hypothesis," Altruism: Rev. of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 149-175, 1991.
[30] R. Buck and B.E. Ginsburg, "Communicative Genes and the Evolution of Empathy," Empathetic Accuracy, W. Ickes, ed., pp. 17-43, Guilford Press, 1997.
[31] M. Davis and L. Kraus, "Personality and Empathic Accuracy," Empathic Accuracy, W. Ickes ed., pp. 144-168, Guilford Press, 1997.
[32] Plato, Symposium. The Univ.of Chicago Press, 2001.
[33] I. Singer, Explorations in Love and Sex. Rowman and Littlefield, 2001.
[34] Information retrieved from: http:/hooman.lovotics.com/, 2012.
[35] H.A. Samani and A.D. Cheok, "Probability of Love between Robots and Humans," Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2010.
[36] H.A. Samani et al., "Towards a Formulation of Love in Human-Robot Interaction," Proc. 19th IEEE Int'l Symp. Robot and Human Interactive Comm., 2010.
[37] H.A. Samani et al., "A Design Process for Lovotics," Proc. Int'l Conf. Human-Robot Personal Relationships, pp. 118-125, 2011.
[38] Intelligent Robotics Laboratory: http://www.is.sys.es. osaka-u.ac.jpindex.en.html , 2012.
[39] Hiroshi Ishiguro Laboratory, ATR, http://www.geminoid.jp/enindex.html, 2012.
[40] M. Mori, "The Uncanny Valley," Energy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 33-35, 1970.
[41] M. Mori, The Buddha in the Robot: A Robot Engineer's Thoughts on Science and Religion. Kosei Publishing, 1981.
[42] C.A. Breazeal, "Robot in Society: Friend or Appliance?" Proc. Autonomous Agents Workshop Emotion-Based Agent Architectures, pp. 18-26, 1999.
[43] C.A. Breazeal, Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, 2002.
[44] C.A. Breazeal, R.A. Brooks, J. Gray, G. Hoffman, C. Kidd, H. Lee, J. Lieberman, A. Lockerd, and D. Mulanda, "Humanoid Robots as Cooperative Partners for People," http://robotic.media.mit.edu/PapersBreazeal-etal-ijhr04.pdf , 2004.
[45] R.A. Brooks, Flesh and Machines. Pantheon Books, 2002.
[46] S. Gaudin, "NASA: Humanoid Robot Slated to Live on Space Station," Computerworld, www.computerworld.com, Apr. 2010.
[47] T. Kanda and H. Ishiguro, "Communication Robots for Elementary Schools," http://www.irc.atr.jp/~kanda/pdfkanda-aisb2005.pdf , 2005.
[48] T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, and T. Ishida, "Psychological Analysis on Human-Robot Interaction," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 4166-4173, 2001.
[49] T. Kanda, R. Sato, N. Saiwaki, and H. Ishiguro, "Friendly Social Robot that Understands Human's Friendly Relationships," Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2215-2222, 2004.
[50] M. Scheutz, P. Schermerhorn, J. Kramer, and C. Middendorff, "The Utility of Affect Expression in Natural Language Interactions in Joint Human-Robot Tasks," Proc. First ACM Int'l Conf. Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 226-233, 2006.
[51] B. Duffy, "Anthropomorphism and the Social Robot," Robotics and Automation Systems, vol. 42, pp. 177-190, 2003.
[52] P. Menzel and F. D'Aluisio, Robosapiens: Evolution of a New Species. MIT Press, 2000.
[53] J.P. Sullins, "Friends by Design: A Design Philosophy for Personal Robotics Technology," Philosophy and Design: From Eng. to Architecture, P. Vermaas, P. Kroes, A. Light, and S. Moore, eds., pp. 143-158, Springer, 2008.
[54] M. Scheutz, "The Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics and Automation, 2009.
[55] S.D.N. Cook, "Design and Responsibility: The Interdependence of Natural, Artifactural, and Human Systems," Philosophy and Design: From Eng. to Architecture, P. Vermaas, P. Kroes, A. Light, and S. Moore eds., pp. 259-269, Springer, 2008.
15 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool