The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - July-Sept. (2013 vol.6)
pp: 217-227
A. Zitek , Dept. of Chem., Univ. of Natural Resources & Life Sci. Vienna, Vienna, Austria
M. Poppe , Inst. of Hydrobiology & Aquatic Ecosyst. Manage., Univ. of Natural Resources & Life Sci. Vienna, Vienna, Austria
M. Stelzhammer , Inst. of Hydrobiology & Aquatic Ecosyst. Manage., Univ. of Natural Resources & Life Sci. Vienna, Vienna, Austria
S. Muhar , Inst. of Hydrobiology & Aquatic Ecosyst. Manage., Univ. of Natural Resources & Life Sci. Vienna, Vienna, Austria
B. Bredeweg , Inf. Inst., Univ. of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
ABSTRACT
The DynaLearn interactive learning environment enables learning by having learners create conceptual models of system's behavior. This paper reports on exploratory evaluation studies using the DynaLearn software, carried out with learners studying environmental science. Two three-day modeling sessions were conducted in two consecutive years with two students exploring the evolving prototype of the software. The learners worked on assignments designed to achieve specific learning goals. To investigate conceptual changes on behalf of the learner, a set of parameters was applied for semantic text analysis of written pre- and posttests. The evaluation results show key changes occurring in knowledge structure and content in both years for both students. Indications of an effect of prior knowledge on the magnitude of conceptual change were found. The results confirm the potential of DynaLearn for inducing causal and interlinked understanding of environmental systems.
INDEX TERMS
Biological system modeling, Software, Sociology, Statistics, Production, Marine animals, Educational institutions,learning by modeling, Biological system modeling, Software, Sociology, Statistics, Production, Marine animals, Educational institutions, science education, Evaluation study, conceptual knowledge change
CITATION
A. Zitek, M. Poppe, M. Stelzhammer, S. Muhar, B. Bredeweg, "Learning by Conceptual Modeling--Changes in Knowledge Structure and Content", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.6, no. 3, pp. 217-227, July-Sept. 2013, doi:10.1109/TLT.2013.7
REFERENCES
[1] D. Jonassen and J. Strobel, "Modeling for Meaningful Learning," Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies, D. Hung and M.S. Khine, eds., pp. 1-27. Springer, 2006.
[2] C.V. Schwarz and B.Y. White, "Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students Understanding of Scientific Modeling," Cognition and Instruction, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 165-205, 2005.
[3] J. Gobert, L. O'Dwyer, P. Horwitz, B. Buckley, S.T. Levy, and U. Wilensky, "Examining the Relationship between Students' Epistemologies of Models and Conceptual Learning in Three Science Domains: Biology, Physics, & Chemistry," Int'l J. Science Education, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 653-684, 2011.
[4] J. Osborne, S. Simon, and S. Collins, "Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications," Int'l J. Science Education, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1049-1079, 2003.
[5] V. Otero, A. Johnson, and F. Goldberg, "How Does the Computer Facilitate the Development of Physics Knowledge among Prospective Elementary Teachers?" J. Educational Psychology, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 57-89, 1999.
[6] H. Niedderer, S. Aufschnaiter, A. Tiberghien, C. Buty, K. Haller, L. Hucke, F. Seter, and H. Fischer, "Talking Physics in Labwork Contexts—A Category Based Analysis of Videotapes," Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory, D. Psillos and H. Niedderer, eds., pp. 31-40. Kluwer, 2002.
[7] L. Hucke and H.E. Fischer, "The Link of Theory and Practice in Traditional and in Computer Based University Laboratory Experiments," Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory, D. Psillos and H. Niedderer, eds., pp. 205-218. Kluwer, 2002.
[8] K.D. Forbus, K. Carney, B.L. Sherin, and L.C. UreelII, "VModel—A Visual Qualitative Modeling Environment for Middle-School Students," AI Magazine, vol. 26, pp. 63-72, 2005.
[9] K. Leelawong and G. Biswas, "Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System," Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 18, pp. 181-208, 2008.
[10] B. Bredeweg, F. Linnebank, A. Bouwer, and J. Liem, "Garp3— Workbench for Qualitative Modelling and Simulation," Ecological Informatics, vol. 4, pp. 263-281, 2009.
[11] K.D. Forbus, "Qualitative Modeling," Handbook of Knowledge Representation, F. van Harmelen, V. Lifschitz, and B. Porter, eds., vol. 3, pp. 361-393. Elsevier, 2008.
[12] B. Bredeweg, A. Gómez-Pérez, E. André, and P. Salles, "DynaLearn—Engaging and Informed Tools for Learning Conceptual System Knowledge," Proc. AAAI Fall Symp. Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems (MCES '09), pp. 46-51, Nov. 2009.
[13] B. Bredeweg, J. Liem, W. Beek, P. Salles, and F. Linnebank, "Learning Spaces as Representational Scaffolds for Learning Conceptual Knowledge of System Behaviour," Proc. Fifth European Conf. Technology Enhanced Learning Conf. Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice, pp. 46-61, 2010.
[14] H. Arndt, "Enhancing System Thinking in Education Using System Dynamics," Simulation, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 795-806, 2006.
[15] R.A. Duschl and D.H. Gitomer, "Epistemological Perspectives on Conceptual Change: Implications for Educational Practice," J. Research in Science Teaching, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 839-858, 1991.
[16] DynaLearn, http:/www.dynalearn.eu, 2012.
[17] K.D. Forbus, "Qualitative Process Theory," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, pp. 85-168, 1984.
[18] A. Bouwer and B. Bredeweg, "Graphical Means for Inspecting Qualitative Models of System Behaviour," Instructional Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 173-208, 2010.
[19] J. Gracia, J. Liem, E. Lozano, O. Corcho, M. Trna, A. Gómez-Pérez, and B. Bredeweg, "Semantic Techniques for Enabling Knowledge Reuse in Conceptual Modelling," Proc. Ninth Int'l Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC '10), pp. 82-97, 2010.
[20] Centre for Microcomputer Applications, http:/cma-science.nl, 2012.
[21] Insight Maker, http:/insightmaker.com, 2012.
[22] "Causality Lab---Overview," http://www.phil.cmu.edu/ projectscausality-lab , 2012.
[23] MathWorks, http:/www.mathworks.com, 2012.
[24] Cmap Tools, http:/cmap.ihmc.us, 2012.
[25] "Causal Mapping with jMap," https://sites.google.com/site causalmaps , 2012.
[26] G. Biswas, D. Schwartz, and J. Bransford, "Technology Support for Complex Problem Solving: From Sad Environments to AI," Smart Machines in Education, K. Forbus and P. Feltovich, eds., pp. 71-98. MIT Press, 2001.
[27] K.D. Forbus, K. Carney, R. Harris, and B.L. Sherin, "A Qualitative Modeling Environment for Middle-School Students: A Progress Report," Proc. 15th Int'l Workshop Qualitative Reasoning, pp. 65-72, 2001.
[28] C.W. Roberts, "A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis," Quality and Quantity, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259-274, 2000.
[29] M. Dresner and M. Elser, "Enhancing Science Teachers' Understanding of Ecosystem Interactions with Qualitative Conceptual Models," Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology, vol. 6, article 1, 2009.
[30] I. Ruiz-Mallen, L. Barraza, B. Bodenhorn, and V. Reyes-Garcia, "Evaluating the Impact of an Environmental Education Programme: An Empirical Study in Mexico," Environmental Education Research, vol. 15, pp. 371-387, 2009.
[31] M.A. Abernethy, M. Horne, A.M. Lillis, M.A. Malina, and F.H. Selto, "A Multi-Method Approach to Building Causal Performance Maps from Expert Knowledge," Management Accounting Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 135-155, 2005.
[32] I.M. Kinchin, D.B. Hay, and A. Adams, "How a Qualitative Approach to Concept Map Analysis Can Be Used to Aid Learning by Illustrating Patterns of Conceptual Development," Educational Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 43-57, 2001.
[33] N.J. Fellows, "A Window into Thinking: Using Student Writing to Understand Conceptual Change in Science Learning," J. Research in Science Teaching, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 985-1001, 1994.
[34] M. Khalifa and K.N. Shen, "Applying Semantic Networks to Hypertext Design: Effects on Knowledge Structure Acquisition and Problem Solving," J. Am. Soc. for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1673-1685, 2010.
[35] R.B. Lewis, "Nvivo 2.0 and Atlas.Ti 5.0: A Comparative Review of Two Popular Qualitative Data-Analysis Programs," Field Methods, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 439-464, 2004.
[36] A.C. Kurtz dos Santos, M.R. Thielo, and A.A. Kleer, "Students Modelling Environmental Issues," J. Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35-47, 1997.
[37] R. Plate, "Assessing Individuals' Understanding of Nonlinear Causal Structures in Complex Systems," System Dynamics Rev., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 19-33, 2010.
[38] M. Bunge, Causality and Modern Science, fourth revised ed., p. 417. Transaction Publishers, 2009.
[39] R. Driver and V. Oldham, "A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science," Studies in Science Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 105-122, 1986.
[40] R. Duit and D.F. Treagust, "Conceptual Change: A Powerful Framework for Improving Science Teaching and Learning," Int'l J. Science Education, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 671-688, 2003.
[41] P. Wolff, "Direct Causation in the Linguistic Coding and Individuation of Causal Events," Cognition, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 1-48, 2003.
[42] P. Wolff, B. Klettke, T. Ventura, and G. Song, "Expressing Causation in English and Other Languages," Categorization Inside and Outside the Laboratory: Essays in Honor of Douglas L. Medin, W. Ahn, R.L. Goldstone, B.C. Love, A.B. Markman, and P. Wolff, eds., pp. 29-48. Am. Psychological Assoc., 2005.
[43] I.M. Kinchin, D.B. Hay, and A. Adams, "How a Qualitative Approach to Concept Map Analysis Can Be Used to Aid Learning by Illustrating Patterns of Conceptual Development," Educational Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 43-57, 2000.
[44] J. Wilson, "Differences in Knowledge Networks about Acids and Bases of Year-12, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Chemistry Students," Research in Science Education, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 429-446, 1998.
[45] M.M.C. Barrientos, Evaluating System Dynamics as a Tool for Teaching History: An Experimental Research in the Classroom. VDM Verlag, 2008.
[46] M.G. Hewson and P.W. Hewson, "Effect of Instruction Using Students' Prior Knowledge and Conceptual Change Strategies on Science Learning," J. Research in Science Teaching, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 731-743, 1983.
[47] H. Meyer, "Novice and Expert Teachers' Conceptions of Learners' Prior Knowledge," Science Education, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 970-983, 2004.
[48] P.W. Hewson, "A Conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science," European J. Science Education, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 383-396, 1981.
[49] S. Vosniadou, C. Ioannides, A. Dimitrakopoulou, and E. Papademetriou, "Designing Learning Environments to Promote Conceptual Change in Science," Learning and Instruction, vol. 11, nos. 4/5, pp. 381-419, 2001.
76 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool