The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - Third Quarter (2012 vol.5)
pp: 199-212
P. Moguel , Grenoble Inf. Lab., Univ. of Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
P. Tchounikine , Grenoble Inf. Lab., Univ. of Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
A. Tricot , CLLE-LTC Lab., Univ. of Toulouse II, Toulouse, France
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we consider collective problem-solving challenges and a particular structuring objective: lead groups of learners to make their shared problem-solving organization explicit. Such an objective may be considered as a way to lead learners to consider building and maintaining a shared organization, and/or as a way to provide a basis for monitoring learners' organizational process. Work presented in this paper highlights the interest of Bardram's model of collective work to inspire design principles of interfaces supporting learners in making their organization explicit. Of particular importance are the facts that organization is somewhat reified (here, as an array), organization and execution interfaces are similar and connected, and learners are given flexibility in enacting partial organizations or adapting their constructions in context.
INDEX TERMS
Organizations, Problem-solving, Monitoring, Collaboration, Context, Electric breakdown, Software,problem solving, Organizations, Problem-solving, Monitoring, Collaboration, Context, Electric breakdown, Software, interfaces, Index Terms—Collaborative learning, groupware
CITATION
P. Moguel, P. Tchounikine, A. Tricot, "Interfaces Leading Groups of Learners to Make Their Shared Problem-Solving Organization Explicit", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.5, no. 3, pp. 199-212, Third Quarter 2012, doi:10.1109/TLT.2011.30
REFERENCES
[1] P. Dillenbourg, "What Do You Mean by Collaborative Learning?" Collaborative-Learning, Cognitive and Computational Approaches, P. Dillenbourg, ed., pp. 1-19, Elsevier, 1999.
[2] L. Kobbe, A. Weinberger, P. Dillenbourg, A. Harrer, R. Hämäläinen, P. Häkkinen, and F. Fischer, "Specifying Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts," Int'l J. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 2, nos. 2/3, pp. 211-224, 2007.
[3] I. Kollar, F. Fischer, and F.W. Hesse, "Computer-Supported Cooperation Scripts—A Conceptual Analysis," Educational Psychology Rev., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 159-185, 2006.
[4] P. Tchounikine, N. Rummel, and B.M. McLaren, "Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Intelligent Tutoring Systems," Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, R. Nkambou, R. Mizoguchi, J. Bourdeau, eds., pp. 447-463, Springer-Verlag, 2010.
[5] P. Jermann, "Computer Support for Interaction Regulation in Collaborative Problem-Solving," PhD dissertation, Univ. of Geneva, 2004.
[6] P. Moguel, P. Tchounikine, and A. Tricot, "Supporting Learners' Organization in Collective Challenges," Proc. European Conf. Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL '08), pp. 290-303, 2008.
[7] J.H. Larkin and F. Reif, "Understanding and Teaching Problem Solving in Physics," European J. Science Education, vol. 1, pp. 191-203, 1979.
[8] C. Lerch, "Control Decisions and Personal Beliefs: Their Effect on Solving Mathematical Problems," J. Math. Behavior, vol. 23, pp. 21-36, 2004.
[9] J. Zhang, "A Distributed Representation Approach to Group Problem Solving," J. Am. Soc. for Information Science, vol. 49, pp. 801-809, 1998.
[10] G.L. Chang and G. Wells, "The Literate Potential of Collaborative Talk," Int'l Oracy Conv., 1987.
[11] M.J. Baker, T. Hansen, R. Joiner, and D. Traum, "The Role of Grounding in Collaborative Learning Tasks," Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, P. Dillenbourg, ed., pp. 31-63, Pergamon/Elsevier Science, 1999.
[12] A. Soller, A. Martínez-Monés, P. Jermann, and M. Muehlenbrock, "From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning," Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 261-290, 2005.
[13] J. Bardram, "Designing for the Dynamics of Cooperative Work Activities," Proc. ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '98), pp. 89-98, 1998.
[14] J.C. Burguillo, "Using Game-Theory and Competition-Based Learning to Stimulate Student Motivation and Performance," Computers and Education, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 566-575, 2010.
[15] C.E. Hmelo-Silver, "Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?" Educational Psychology Rev., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235-266, 2004.
[16] E. Barbeau, "A Classification of Challenges," Proc. Conf. ICMI Study 16 Challenging Math. in and Beyond the Classroom, 2006.
[17] J. Roschelle and S. Teasley, "The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving," Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, C.E. O'Malley, ed., pp. 69-97, Springer-Verlag, 1995.
[18] R. Pea, "Practices of Distributed Intelligence and Designs for Education," Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, G. Salomon, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993.
[19] B.J. Zimmerman, "Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview," Educational Psychologist, vol. 25, pp. 3-17, 1990.
[20] P.H. Winne and A.F. Hadwin, "Self-Regulated Learning and Sociocognitive Theory," Int'l Encyclopedia of Education, P. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGaw, eds., vol. 5, pp. 503-508, Elsevier, 2010.
[21] M. Kapur and C.K. Kinzer, "Productive Failure in CSCL Groups," Int'l J. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21-46, 2009.
[22] P. Dillenbourg and P. Jermann, "SWISH: A Model for Designing CSCL Scripts," Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning—Cognitive, Computational, and Educational Perspectives, F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, and J.M. Haake, eds., Springer, 2007.
[23] P. Dillenbourg, "Over-Scripting CSCL: The Risks of Blending Collaborative Learning with Instructional Design," Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL, P.A. Kirschner, ed., pp. 61-91, Open Universiteit Nederland, 2002.
[24] P. Dillenbourg and P. Tchounikine, "Flexibility in Macro-Scripts for CSCL," J. Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2007.
[25] K. Schmidt and L. Bannon, "Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work," Int'l J. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 1, nos. 1/2, pp. 7-40, 1992.
[26] P. Tchounikine, "Operationalizing Macro-Scripts in CSCL Technological Settings," Int'l J. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 193-233, 2008.
[27] L. Kobbe, A. Weinberger, P. Dillenbourg, A. Harrer, R. Hämäläinen, P. Häkkinen, and F. Fischer, "Specifying Computer- Supported Collaboration Scripts," Int'l J. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 2, nos. 2/3, pp 211-224, 2007.
[28] T. de Jong, W.R. Van Joolingen, and C.A. Grant, "Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains," Rev. Educational Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 179-202, 1998.
[29] J. Bardram, "Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems," Proc. Fifth Conf. European Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW '97), pp. 17-32, 1997.
[30] B. Kramarski, "Making Sense of Graphs: Does Metacognitive Instruction Make a Difference on Students' Mathematical Conceptions and Alternative Conceptions?" Learning and Instruction, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 593-619, 2004.
[31] P. Moguel, P. Tchounikine, and A. Tricot, "A Model-Based Analysis of the Organization of Students Involved in a Computer-Based Pedagogical Challenge," Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Computer Support Collaborative Learning (CSCL '09), pp. 73-77, 2009.
[32] P. Moguel, P. Tchounikine, and A. Tricot, "Supporting Learners' Self-Organization: An Exploratory Study," Proc. Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS '10), pp. 123-133, 2010.
[33] P. Tchounikine, Computer Science and Educational Software Design. A Resource for Multidisciplinary Work in Technology Enhanced Learning. Springer-Verlag, 2011.
[34] La Course Sans Gagnant, http://www.patrickmoisan.net/copainscourse_sans_gagnant.html , 2012.
[35] H.W. Marsh, K. Hau, C. Artelt, J. Baumert, and J.L. Peschar, "OECD's Brief Self-Report Measure of Educational Psychology's Most Useful Affective Constructs: Cross-Cultural, Psychometric Comparisons Across 25 Countries," Int'l J. Testing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 311-360, 2006.
48 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool