The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - Jan.-March (2011 vol.4)
pp: 21-34
Rohit Kumar , Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
Carolyn P. Rosé , Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
ABSTRACT
Tutorial Dialog Systems that employ Conversational Agents (CAs) to deliver instructional content to learners in one-on-one tutoring settings have been shown to be effective in multiple learning domains by multiple research groups. Our work focuses on extending this successful learning technology to collaborative learning settings involving two or more learners interacting with one or more agents. Experience from extending existing techniques for developing conversational agents into multiple-learner settings highlights two underlying assumptions from the one-learner setting that do not generalize well to the multiuser setting, and thus cause difficulties. These assumptions include what we refer to as the near-even participation assumption and the known addressee assumption. A new software architecture called Basilica that allows us to address and overcome these limitations is a major contribution of this article. The Basilica architecture adopts an object-oriented approach to represent agents as a network composed of what we refer to as behavioral components because they enable the agents to engage in rich conversational behaviors. Additionally, we describe three specific conversational agents built using Basilica in order to illustrate the desirable properties of this new architecture.
INDEX TERMS
Collaborative learning, intelligent agents, natural language interfaces, software architectures.
CITATION
Rohit Kumar, Carolyn P. Rosé, "Architecture for Building Conversational Agents that Support Collaborative Learning", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.4, no. 1, pp. 21-34, Jan.-March 2011, doi:10.1109/TLT.2010.41
REFERENCES
[1] R. Kumar, C.P. Rosé, M. Joshi, Y.C. Wang, Y. Cui, and A. Robinson, “Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support,” Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED '07), 2007.
[2] R. Kumar, G. Gweon, M. Joshi, Y. Cui, and C.P. Rosé, “Supporting Students Working Together on Math with Social Dialogue,” Proc. Workshop Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLATE '07), 2007.
[3] S. Chaudhuri, R. Kumar, M. Joshi, E. Terrell, F. Higgs, V. Aleven, and C.P. Rosé, “It's Not Easy Being Green: Supporting Collaborative Green Design Learning,” Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS '08), 2008.
[4] S. Chaudhuri, R. Kumar, I. Howley, and C.P. Rosé, “Engaging Collaborative Learners with Helping Agents,” Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED '09), 2009.
[5] H. Ai, R. Kumar, D. Nguyen, A. Nagasunder, and C.P. Rosé, “Exploring the Effectiveness of Social Capabilities and Goal Alignment in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS '10), 2010.
[6] R. Kumar, H. Ai, J.L. Beuth, and C.P. Rosé, “Socially-Capable Conversational Tutors Can be Effective in Collaborative-Learning Situations,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS '10), 2010.
[7] E. Arnott, P. Hastings, and D. Allbritton, “Research Methods Tutor: Evaluation of a Dialogue-Based Tutoring System in the Classroom,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 694-698, 2008.
[8] A.C. Graesser, P. Chipman, B.C. Haynes, and A. Olney, “AutoTutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System with Mixed-Initiative Dialogue,” IEEE Trans. Education, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 612-618, Nov. 2005.
[9] A. Renkl, R. Stark, H. Gruber, and H. Mandl, “Learning from Worked-Out Examples: The Effects of Example Variability and Elicited Self-Explanations,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 23, pp. 90-108, 1998.
[10] V. Aleven and K.R. Koedinger, “The Need for Tutorial Dialog to Support Self-Explanation,” AAAI Fall Symp. Building Dialogue Systems for Tutorial Applications, pp. 65-73, 2000.
[11] I. Kollar, F. Fischer, and F.W. Hesse, “Computer-Supported Cooperation Scripts—A Conceptual Analysis,” Educational Psychology Rev., 2006.
[12] A. Weinberger, “Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Effects of Social and Epistemic Cooperation Scripts on Collaborative Knowledge Construction,” Dissertation, Univ. of Munich, 2003.
[13] M. Baker and K. Lund, “Promoting Reflective Interactions in a CSCL Environment,” J. Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 13, pp.175-193, 1997.
[14] A.M. O'Donnell, “Structuring Dyadic Interaction through Scripted Cooperation,” Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, A.M. O'Donnell and A. King, eds., pp. 179-196, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
[15] K. Stegmann, A. Weinberger, F. Fischer, and H. Mandl, “Scripting Argumentation in Computer-Supported Learning Environments,” Proc. Joint Meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computer-Supported Learning, P.Gerjets, P.A. Kirschner, J. Elen, and R. Joiner, eds., pp. 320-330, 2004.
[16] C.P. Rosé, Y.C. Wang, Y. Cui, J. Arguello, K. Stegmann, A. Weinberger, and F. Fischer, “Analyzing Collaborative Learning Processes: Automatically Exploiting the Advances of Computational Linguistics in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,” Int'l J. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 237-271, 2008.
[17] C.P. Rosé, D. Bhembe, S. Siler, R. Srivastava, and K. VanLehn, “Exploring the Effectiveness of Knowledge Construction Dialogues,” Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED '03), 2003.
[18] VoiceXML, http://www.w3.org/TRvoicexml21, 2007.
[19] P. Jordan, B. Hall, M. Ringenberg, Y. Cui, and C.P. Rosé, “Tools for Authoring a Dialogue Agent that Participates in Learning Studies,” Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED '07), 2007.
[20] R. Freedman, “Plan-Based Dialogue Management in a Physics Tutor,” Proc. Sixth Applied Natural Language Processing Conf., pp.52-59, 2000.
[21] D. Bohus and A.I. Rudnicky, “The RavenClaw Dialog Management Framework: Architecture and Systems,” Computer Speech and Language, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 332-361, 2009.
[22] A. Raux, “Flexible Turn-Taking in Spoken Dialog Systems,” PhD Dissertation, Language Technologies Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., 2008.
[23] Š. Benuš, “Are We ‘In Sync’: Turn-Taking in Collaborative Dialogues,” Proc. Interspeech, 2009.
[24] D. Bohus, “Error Awareness and Recovery in Conversational Spoken Language Interfaces,” PhD dissertation, Computer Science Dept., Carnegie Mellon Univ., 2007.
[25] D. Diziol, E. Walker, N. Rummel, and K.R. Koedinger, “Using Intelligent Tutor Technology to Implement Adaptive Support for Student Collaboration,” Educational Psychology Rev., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 89-102, 2010.
[26] K. Kreijns, P.A. Kirschner, and W. Jochems, “Identifying the Pitfalls for Social Interaction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments: A Review of the Research,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 19, pp. 335-353, 2003.
[27] G. Gweon, S. Jeon, J. Lee, S. Finger, and C.P. Rosé, “A Framework for Assessment of StudentProject Groups On-Line and Off-Line,” Analyzing Interactions in CSCL: Methods, Approaches and Issues, S.Puntambekar, G. Erkens, and C. Hmelo-Silver, eds., pp. 293-318, Springer, 2011.
[28] S. Larson, “Dialogue Systems and Projects,” http://www.ling.gu. se/~sldialogue_links.html , 2006.
[29] I. O'Neill, P. Hanna, X. Liu, and M. McTear, “The Queen's Communicator: An Object-Oriented Dialogue Manager,” Proc. Eurospeech, pp. 593-596, 2003.
[30] P. Jordan, M. Rigenberg, and B. Hall, “Rapidly Developing Dialogue Systems that Support Learning Studies,” Proc. ITS Workshop Teaching with Robots, Agents and NLP, 2006.
[31] B.K.A. Weusijana, R. Kumar, and C.P. Rose, “MultiTalker: Building Conversational Agents in Second Life Using Basilica,” Second Life Education Community Convention, Purple Strand: Educational Tools and Products, 2008.
[32] A.C. Graesser, M. Jeon, and D. David, “Agent Technologies Designed to Facilitate Interactive Knowledge Construction,” Discourse Processes, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 298-322, 2008.
[33] F. Loll, N. Pinkwart, O. Scheuer, and B.M. McLaren, “Towards a Flexible Intelligent Tutoring System for Argumentation,” Proc. Ninth IEEE Int'l Conf. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT '09), 2009.
[34] W. Chen, J. Dolonen, and B. Wasson, “Supporting Collaborative Knowledge Building with Intelligent Agents,” Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Eng. Systems, Advances in Artificial Intelligence, V. Palade, R.J. Howlett, and L.C. Jain, eds., pp. 238-244, 2003.
[35] K.D. Forbus, P.B. Whalley, J.O. Evrett, L. Ureel, M. Brokowski, J. Baher, and S.E. Kuehne, “CyclePad: An Articulate Virtual Laboratory for Engineering Thermodynamics,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 114, nos. 1-2, pp. 297-347, 1999.
[36] M. Mühlpfordt and M. Wessner, “Explicit Referencing in Chat Supports Collaborative Learning,” Proc. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL '05), 2005.
[37] R.F. Bales, Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Addison-Wesley, 1950.
[38] C.-Y. Chou, T.-W. Chan, and C.-J. Lin, “Redefining the Learning Companion: The Past, Present, and Future of Educational Agents,” Computers and Education, vol. 40, pp. 255-269, 2003.
25 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool