The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - April-June (2010 vol.3)
pp: 152-164
Anuradha Phalke , University of Arizona, Tucson
Susan Lysecky , University of Arizona, Tucson
ABSTRACT
The benefits of project-based learning environments are well documented; however, setting up and maintaining these environments can be challenging due to the high cost and expertise associated with these platforms. To alleviate some of these roadblocks, the existing eBlock platform which is composed of fixed function building blocks targeted to enable nonexperts users to easily build a variety of interactive electronic systems is expanded to incorporate newly defined integer-based building blocks to enable a wider range of project possibilities for middle school STEM projects. We discuss various interface possibilities, including initial usability experiments, and summarize our overall experiences and observations in working with local middles school students utilizing the eBlock platform.
INDEX TERMS
Devices for learning, learning environments, learning via discovery.
CITATION
Anuradha Phalke, Susan Lysecky, "Adapting the eBlock Platform for Middle School STEM Projects: Initial Platform Usability Testing", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.3, no. 2, pp. 152-164, April-June 2010, doi:10.1109/TLT.2009.41
REFERENCES
[1] B. Alberts, "Some Thoughts of a Scientist on Inquiry," Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science, pp. 3-13, Am. Assoc. for the Advancement of Science, 2000.
[2] J. Allende, "Academies Active in Education," Science, vol. 321, no. 5893, p. 1133, Aug. 2008.
[3] A. Anlezark, P. Lim, R. Semo, and N. Nguyen, "From STEM to Leaf: Where Are Australia's Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (STEM) Students Heading?" Dept. of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, 2008.
[4] Arizona Department of Education, "Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) Results," State Report Card, http://www.ade.state.az.us/srcs/statereportcards StateReport Card06-07.pdf, 2007.
[5] S. Atmatzidou, I. Markelis, and S. Demetriadis, "The Use of LEGO Mindstorms in Elementary and Secondary Education: Game as a Way of Triggering Learning," Proc. Int'l Conf. Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots, 2008.
[6] N. Balasubramanian, B. Wilson, and K. Cios, "Innovative Methods of Teaching and Learning Science and Engineering in Middle Schools," Proc. Int'l Conf. Education and Information Systems: Technology and Applications, 2005.
[7] B. Barron, D. Schwartz, N. Vye, A. Moore, A. Petrosino, L. Zech, and J. Bransford, "Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning," J. Learning Sciences, vol. 7, pp. 271-311, 1998.
[8] B. Benson, "Scaffolding: Coming to Terms," English J., vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 126-127, 1997.
[9] C. Berg, V. Bergendahl, B. Lundberg, and L. Tibell, "Benefiting from an Open-Ended Experiment? A Comparison of Attitudes to, and Outcomes of, an Expository versus an Open-Inquiry Version of the Same Experiment," Int'l J. Science Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 351-372, 2003.
[10] L. Bertelli, F. Bovo, L. Grespan, S. Galvan, and P. Fiorini, "Eddy: An Open Hardware Robot for Education," Proc. Int'l Symp. Autonomous Minirobots for Research and Edutainment, Oct. 2007.
[11] P. Blumenfeld, J. Kempler, and S. Krajcik, "Motivation and Cognitive Engagement in Learning Environments," Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, R.K. Sawyer, ed., pp. 475-488, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006.
[12] R. Chang, "Challenges in STEM Education," Proc. National Science Foundation Workshop, 2008.
[13] Committee Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Nat'l Academies Press, http://www.nap.edu/catalog11463.html, 2007.
[14] S. Cotterell and F. Vahid, "A Logic Block Enabling Logic Configuration by Non-Experts in Sensor Networks," Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005.
[15] S. Cotterell and F. Vahid, "Usability of State Based Boolean eBlocks," Proc. Int'l Conf. Human-Computer Interaction, 2005.
[16] S. Cotterell, K. Downey, and F. Vahid, "Applications and Experiments with eBlocks—Electronic Blocks for Basic Sensor-Based Systems," Proc. IEEE Conf. Sensor and Ad Hoc Comm. and Networks, 2004.
[17] Crossbow Technology, http:/www.xbow.com, 2008.
[18] B.J. Cruickshank and J. Olander, "Can Problem-Based Instruction Stimulate Higher Order Thinking? Converting an Instrument Analysis Lab," J. College Science Teaching, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 374-377, 2002.
[19] eBlocks Science Kits, http://www.ece.arizona.edu/∼uecs/ eb_ kitsindex.html, 2008.
[20] European Commission—Directorate-General for Research. Science Education, "NOW: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe," Science, Economy, and Society, 2007.
[21] D. Ferranti, G. Perry, and S.G. Indermit, Closing the Gap in Education and Technology. The World Bank, 2003.
[22] B. Gammon, "Everything We Currently Know about Making Visitor-Friendly Mechanical Interactive," British Interactive Group, http:/www.big.uk.com, 1999.
[23] R. Geier, P. Blumenfeld, R. Marx, J. Krajcik, B. Fishman, and E. Soloway, "Standardized Test Outcomes of Urban Students Participating in Standards and Project Based Science Curricula," Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf. Learning Sciences, 2004.
[24] S. Greenberg and C. Fitchett, "Phidgets: Easy Development of Physical Interfaces through Physical Widgets," Proc. ACM Symp. User interface Software and Technology, pp. 209-218, 2001.
[25] M. Guzdial, "Only the Developed Word Lacks Women in Computing," Comm. ACM, vol. 52, no. 8, Aug. 2009.
[26] M. Haberman, "The Pedagogy of Poverty versus Good Teaching," Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 73, pp. 290-294, 1991.
[27] B. Hasslacher and M. Tilden, "Living Machines," Robotics and Autonomous Systems: The Biology and Technology of Intelligent Autonomous Agents, Elsivier Publishers, 1995.
[28] J. Hill and D. Culler, "MICA: A Wireless Platform for Deeply Embedded Networks," IEEE Micro, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 12-24, Nov./Dec. 2002.
[29] Infinity Project, http:/www.infinity-project.org, 2006.
[30] Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, "International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results from the US Perspective," http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/PISAPISA2003highlights.asp , 2007.
[31] Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, "Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003," http://nces.ed.gov/timssResults03.asp, 2007.
[32] S. Jackson, "The Quiet Crisis: Falling Short in Producing American Science and Technical Talent," Building Eng. Science Talent (BEST) report, 2004.
[33] N. Kharma and L. Caro, "MagicBlocks: A Game Kit for Exploring Digital Logic," Proc. Am. Soc. for Eng. Education Ann. Conf., 2002.
[34] F. Klassner and S. Anderson, "Lego MindStorms: Not Just for K-12 Anymore," IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 12-18, June 2003.
[35] J. Kovac, "Student Active Learning Methods in General Chemistry," J. Chemical Education, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 120-124, 1999.
[36] J. Krajcik and C.M. Czerniak, Teaching Science in Elementary and Middle School: A Project-Based Approach, third ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007.
[37] J. Krajcik, P. Blumenfeld, R. Marx, and E. Soloway, "A Collaborative Model for Helping Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction," The Elementary School J., vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 483-497, 1994.
[38] Logiblocs, http:/www.logiblocs.com, 2007.
[39] Logidules, http://diwww.epfl.ch/lami/teachlogidules.html , 2010.
[40] B. Lunsford and M. Herzog, "Active Learning in Anatomy and Physiology: Student Reactions and Outcomes in a Nontraditional AP Course," The Am. Biology Teacher, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 80-84, 1997.
[41] S.J. Lynch, Equity and Science Education Reform. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
[42] S. Lysecky and F. Vahid, "Enabling Non-Expert Construction of Basic Sensor-Based Systems," ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 16, no. 1, 2009.
[43] R. Mannion, H. Hsieh, S. Cotterell, and F. Vahid, "System Synthesis for Networks of Programmable Blocks," Proc. Conf. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, 2005.
[44] N. Marquardt and S. Greenberg, "Distributed Physical Interfaces with Shared Phidgets," Proc. Int'l Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 13-20, 2007.
[45] F. Martin et al., "The MIT Programmable Brick," http://lcs. www.media.mit.edu/groups/el/ projectsprogrammable-brick, 2006.
[46] F. Martin et al., "Crickets: Tiny Computers for Big Ideas," http://lcs.www.media.mit.edu/people/fredm/ projectscricket, 2006.
[47] M. Mataric, N. Koenig, and D. Feil-Seifer, "Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education," Proc. AAAI Spring Symp. Robots and Robot Venues: Resources for AI Education, 2007.
[48] Microchip Technology, Inc., PIC16F62X Data Sheet, http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/devicedoc 40300c.pdf, 2006.
[49] M. Mistler-Jackson and N.B. Songer, "Student Motivation and Internet Technology: Are Students Empowered to Learn Science?" J. Research in Science Teaching, vol. 37, pp. 459-479, 2000.
[50] E.B. Moje and K. Hinchman, "Culturally Responsive Practices for Youth Literacy Learning," Adolescent Literacy Research and Practice, J. Dole and T. Jetton, eds., pp. 331-350, Guilford Press, 2004.
[51] A. Nagchaudhuri, G. Singh, M. Kaur, and S. George, "Lego Robotics Products Boost Student Creativity in Pre-College Programs at UMES," Proc. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., 2002.
[52] US National Research Council, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, 1996.
[53] US National Science Board, "Science and Engineering Indicators 2006," http://www.nsf.gov/statisticsseind06, 2006.
[54] US National Science Foundation, "The Challenge and Promise of K-8 Science Education Reform," Foundations: A Monograph for Professionals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, vol. 1, 1997.
[55] K. Newkirk "Selah Intermediate School Science Projects, Science Project 2006 Index," http://www.selah.k12.wa.us/SOAR/SciProj2006 index.htm, 2006.
[56] D. Oppliger, "Using First Lego League to Enhance Engineering Education and to Increase the Pool of Future Engineering Students," Proc. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., 2002.
[57] J. Osborne and J. Dillon, "Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections," report, Nuffield Foundation, Jan. 2008.
[58] Parallax, Inc., http:/www.parallax.com, 2009.
[59] A. Phalke, M. Biller, S. Lysecky, and C. Harris, "Non-Expert Construction of Customized Embedded Systems to Enhance STEM Curricula," ACM SIGBED Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, 2009.
[60] A. Phalke and S. Lysecky, "eBlocks—Embedded Systems Building Blocks to Enable Project-Based Learning," Proc. Workshop Embedded Systems Education, 2008.
[61] Phidgets, http:/www.phidgets.com, 2010.
[62] Phillipsburg Christian Academy Science Fair Projects, http://www.fellowshipch.orgpcasciencefair.html , 2007.
[63] S. Price and Y. Rogers, "Let's Get Physical: The Learning Benefits of Interacting in Digitally Augmented Physical Spaces," Computers and Education, vol. 43, nos. 1/2, pp. 137-151, Aug. 2004.
[64] M. Resnick, "Behavior Construction Kits," Comm. ACM, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 64-71, 1993.
[65] M. Resnick, S. Ocko, and S. Papert, "LEGO, Logo, and Design," Children's Environments Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 14-18, 1988.
[66] L. Richards, M. Gorman, W.T. Scherer, and R.D. Landel, "Promoting Active Learning with Cases and Instructional Modules," J. Eng. Education, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 375-381, 1995.
[67] J. Rubin, "Science Fair Projects Resources," http://www.juliant rubin.com/schooldirectory fairresources.html, 2007.
[68] J. Ruiz-del-Solar and R. Aaviles, "Robotics Courses for Children as a Motivation Tool: The Chilean Experience," IEEE Trans. Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 474-480, Nov. 2004.
[69] R.M. Schneider, J. Krajcik, R.W. Marx, and E. Soloway, "Performance of Students in Project-Based Science Classrooms on a National Measure of Science Achievement," J. Research in Science Teaching, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 410-422, 2002.
[70] Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEMEd) Caucus Steering Committee, "K-12 STEM ED Report Card: How Arizona Ranks," http:/www.stemedcaucus.org, 2006.
[71] M. Sikorski, "Teaching Computers the Young and the Adults: Observations on Learning Style Differences," Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1998.
[72] Smart Dust, http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/∼pister Smart Dust, 2009.
[73] M. Teitelbaum, "The U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: An Unconventional Portrait," Proc. Nat'l Academies' Gov't Univ. Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR) Summit, 2002.
[74] M. Tenchini, "Linking University and School: Addressing the Challenges of Science Teaching in Italy," Science in School, no. 2, 2006.
[75] B. Tribelhorn and Z. Dodds, "Envisioning the Roomba as AI Resource: A Classroom and Laboratory Evaluation," Proc. AAAI Spring Symp. Robots and Robot Venues: Resources for AI Education, 2007.
[76] TUSD Curriculum Resource Guide, http://instech.tusd.k12.az. us/standards index.asp, 2006.
[77] F. Vahid, S. Cotterell, and S. Bakshi, "eBlocks: Embedded Systems Building Blocks," Harvard Business School Business Plan Contest, 2004.
[78] K. Wallice, "America's Brain Drain Crisis," Reader's Digest, Dec. 2005.
[79] P. Wallich, "Mindstorms Not Just a Kid's Toy," IEEE Spectrum, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 52-57, Sept. 2001.
[80] B. Warneke, M. Last, B. Liebowitz, and K. Pister, "Smart Dust: Communicating with a Cubic-Millimeter Computer," Computer, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 44-51, Jan. 2001.
[81] A. Weizman, Y. Schwartz, and D. Fortus, "The Driving Question Board," The Science Teach, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 33-37, Nov. 2008.
[82] L. Whitman and T. Witherspoon, "Using Legos to Interest High School Students and Improve K12 STEM Education," Proc. Ann. Frontiers in Education, vol. 2, 2003.
[83] P. Wyeth and H. Purchase, "Tangible Programming Elements for Young Children," Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2002.
15 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool