The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - October-December (2009 vol.2)
pp: 289-294
David Lowe , University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney
Steve Murray , University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney
Euan Lindsay , Curtin University of Technology, Perth
Dikai Liu , University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney
ABSTRACT
There is growing research into, and development of, the use of the internet to support remote access by students to physical laboratory infrastructure. These remote laboratories can, under appropriate circumstances, support or even replace traditional (proximal) laboratories, provide additional or improved access at reduced cost, and encourage interinstitutional sharing of expensive resources. Effective design of remote laboratories requires attention to the design of both the pedagogy and the technical infrastructure, as well as how these elements interact. In this paper, we consider the architectures of remote laboratories, the shortcomings of existing implementations, and we argue that emerging internet technologies can assist in overcoming these shortcomings. We also consider the opportunities which these technologies provide in moving beyond both existing remote laboratories and existing proximal laboratories, to create opportunities which were not previously possible.
INDEX TERMS
System architectures, integration, and modeling, virtual labs, devices for learning.
CITATION
David Lowe, Steve Murray, Euan Lindsay, Dikai Liu, "Evolving Remote Laboratory Architectures to Leverage Emerging Internet Technologies", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.2, no. 4, pp. 289-294, October-December 2009, doi:10.1109/TLT.2009.33
REFERENCES
[1] L.D. Feisel, G.D. Peterson, O. Arnas, L. Carter, A. Rosa, and W. Worek, “Learning Objectives for Engineering Education Laboratories,” Proc. 32nd Ann. Conf. Frontiers in Education (FIE '02), vol. 2, pp. F1D-1-F1D-24, 2002.
[2] L.D. Feisel and A.J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Education, vol. 94, pp. 121-130, 2005.
[3] J.E. Corter, J.V. Nickerson, S.K. Esche, C. Chassapis, S. Im, and J. Ma, “Constructing Reality: A Study of Remote, Hands-On and Simulated Laboratories,” ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 14, pp. 1-27, 2007.
[4] S.J. Murray and V.L. Lasky, “A Remotely Accessible Embedded Systems Laboratory,” Tools for Teaching Computer Networking and Hardware Concepts, N. Sarkar, ed., pp. 284-302, Information Science Publishing, 2006.
[5] Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, MIT iCampus: iLabs, http://icampus. mit.edu/iLabsdefault.aspx , 2008.
[6] E.D. Lindsay and M.C. Good, “Effects of Laboratory Access Modes upon Learning Outcomes,” IEEE Trans. Education, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 619-631, Nov. 2005.
[7] J.E. Corter, J.V. Nickerson, S.K. Esche, and C. Chassapis, “Remote versus Hands-On Labs: A Comparative Study,” Proc. 34th Am. Soc. for Eng. Education (ASEE)/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., 2005.
[8] D.S. Stein and C.E. Wanstreet, “Role of Social Presence, Choice of Online or Face-to-Face Group Format, and Satisfaction with Perceived Knowledge Gained in a Distance Learning Environment,” Proc. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conf. Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, pp. 193-198, 2003.
[9] W.J. Gibbs, “Implementing On-Line Learning Environments,” J. Computing in Higher Education, vol. 10, pp. 16-37, 1998.
[10] Y. Amigud, G. Archer, J. Smith, M. Szymanski, and B. Servatius, “Assessing the Quality of Web-Enabled Laboratories in Undergraduate Education,” Proc. IEEE Frontiers in Education, vol. 2, pp. 3-12, 2002.
[11] M.S. Cohen and T.J. Ellis, “Developing Criteria for an On-Line Learning Environment: From the Student and Faculty Perspectives,” Am. Soc. for Eng. Education J. Eng. Education, vol. 93, pp. 161-168, 2004.
[12] P.K. Imbrie and S. Raghaven, “A Remote E-Laboratory for Student Investigation, Manipulation and Learning,” Proc. 35th Am. Soc. for Eng. Education (ASEE)/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., p. F3J, 2005.
[13] S.K. Taradi, M. Taradi, K. Radic, and N. Pokrajac, “Blending Problem-Based Learning with Web Technology Positively Impacts Student Learning Outcomes in Acid-Base Physiology,” Advanced Physiology Education, vol. 29, pp. 35-39, 2005.
[14] S. Murray, D. Lowe, E. Lindsay, V. Lasky, and D. Liu, “Experiences with a Hybrid Architecture for Remote Laboratories,” Proc. 38th Ann. Frontiers in Education Conf. (FIE '08), 2008.
[15] V.L. Lasky, D.K. Liu, S.J. Murray, and K.K.L. Choy, “A Remote PLC System for E-Learning,” Proc. Fourth Am. Soc. for Eng. Education (ASEE)/Australasian Assoc. for Eng. Education (AaeE) Global Colloquium in Eng. Education, 2005.
[16] D.G. McLntyre, D.K. Liu, V.L. Lasky, and S.J. Murray, “A Remote Water-Level Rig Laboratory for e-Learning,” Proc. Seventh Int'l Conf. Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET '06), pp. 77-81, 2006.
[17] D. Lowe, C. Berry, S. Murray, and E. Lindsay, “Adapting a Remote Laboratory Architecture to Support Collaboration and Supervision,” Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf. Remote Eng. and Virtual Instrumentation (REV '09), 2009.
[18] E. Lindsay, S. Murray, D. Liu, D. Lowe, and C. Bright, “Establishment Reality vs Maintenance Reality: How Real is Real Enough?” Proc. 36th Ann. Conf. of the European Soc. for Eng. Education (SEFI '08), 2008.
[19] E. Lindsay, S. Murray, D. Liu, D. Lowe, and C. Bright, “Establishment Reality vs Maintenance Reality: How Real is Real Enough?” European J. Eng. Education, to appear.
[20] E. Lindsay, D. Liu, S. Murray, and D. Lowe, “Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education: Trends in Students' Perceptions,” Proc. 18th Ann. Conf. Australasian Assoc. for Eng. Education (AaeE '07), 2007.
[21] H. Benmohamed, A. Leleve, and P. Prevot, “Generic Framework for Remote Laboratory Integration,” Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf. Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET '05), pp. T2B/11-T2B/16, 2005.
[22] F. Schauer, M. Ožvoldová, and F. Lustig, “New Innovative Strategy of Physics Education Using Learning Management System Moodle and Integrated e-Learning with Remote Experiments,” Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf. Remote Eng. and Virtual Instrumentation (REV '09), 2009.
[23] H. Mason, Proc. Second Life Education Workshop, 2007.
21 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool