The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - April-June (2009 vol.2)
pp: 157-166
Leena Razzaq , Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester
Jozsef Patvarczki , Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester
Shane F. Almeida , Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester
Manasi Vartak , Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester
Mingyu Feng , Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester
Neil T. Heffernan , Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester
Kenneth R. Koedinger , Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
ABSTRACT
Content creation is a large component of the cost of creating educational software. Estimates are that approximately 200 hours of development time are required for every hour of instruction. We present an authoring tool designed to reduce this cost as it helps to refine and maintain content. The ASSISTment Builder is a tool designed to effectively create, edit, test, and deploy tutor content. The Web-based interface simplifies the process of tutor construction to allow users with little or no programming experience to develop content. We show the effectiveness of our Builder at reducing the cost of content creation to 40 hours for every hour of instruction. We describe new features that work toward supporting the life cycle of ITS content creation through maintaining and improving content as it is being used by students. The Variabilization feature allows the user to reuse tutoring content across similar problems. The Student Comments feature provides a way to maintain and improve content based on feedback from users. The Most Common Wrong Answer feature provides a way to refine remediation based on the users' answers. This paper describes our attempt to support the life cycle of content creation.
INDEX TERMS
Computer uses in education, e-learning tools, adaptive and intelligent educational systems, authoring tools.
CITATION
Leena Razzaq, Jozsef Patvarczki, Shane F. Almeida, Manasi Vartak, Mingyu Feng, Neil T. Heffernan, Kenneth R. Koedinger, "The ASSISTment Builder: Supporting the Life Cycle of Tutoring System Content Creation", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.2, no. 2, pp. 157-166, April-June 2009, doi:10.1109/TLT.2009.23
REFERENCES
[1] V. Aleven, J. Sewall, B. McLaren, and K. Koedinger, “Rapid Authoring of Intelligent Tutors for Real-World and Experimental Use,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT '06), pp. 847-851, 2006.
[2] J.R. Anderson, A.T. Corbett, K.R. Koedinger, and R. Pelletier, “Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned,” The J. Learning Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 167-207, 1995.
[3] S. Blessing, S. Gilbert, S. Ourada, and S. Ritter, “Lowering the Bar for Creating Model-Tracing Intelligent Tutoring Systems,” Proc. 13th Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence Education, R. Luckin and K.Koedinger, eds., pp. 443-450, 2007.
[4] M. Feng, N.T. Heffernan, and K.R. Koedinger, “Predicting State Test Scores Better with Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Developing Metrics to Measure Assistance Required,” Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, M. Ikeda, K.D. Ashley, and T.-W.Chan, eds., pp. 31-40, 2006.
[5] N.T. Heffernan, T.E. Turner, A.L.N. Lourenco, M.A. Macasek, G. Nuzzo-Jones, and K.R. Koedinger, “The ASSISTment Builder: Towards an Analysis of Cost Effectiveness of ITS Creation,” Proc. Int'l Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Soc. Conf. (FLAIRS '06), 2006.
[6] V. Kodaganallur, R.R. Weitz, and D. Rosenthal, “A Comparison of Model-Tracing and Constraint-Based Intelligent Tutoring Paradigms,” Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence Education, vol. 15, pp. 117-144, 2005.
[7] K.R. Koedinger, V. Aleven, N.T. Heffernan, B. McLaren, and M. Hockenberry, “Opening the Door to Non-Programmers: Authoring Intelligent Tutor Behavior by Demonstration,” Proc. Seventh Ann. Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conf., pp. 162-173, 2004.
[8] K.R. Koedinger, J.R. Anderson, W.H. Hadley, and M.A. Mark, “Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City,” Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence Education, vol. 8, pp. 30-43, 1997.
[9] B. McCandliss, I.L. Beck, R. Sandak, and C. Perfetti, “Focusing Attention on Decoding for Children with Poor Reading Skills: Design and Preliminary Tests of the Word Building Intervention,” Scientific Studies Reading, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 75-104, 2003.
[10] A. Mitrovic, P. Suraweera, B. Martin, K. Zakharov, N. Milik, and J. Holland, “Authoring Constraint-Based Tutors in ASPIRE,” Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 41-50, June 2006.
[11] A. Mitrovic, M. Mayo, P. Suraweera, and B. Martin, “Constraint-Based Tutors: A Success Story,” Proc. 14th Int'l Conf. Industrial Eng. Applications Artificial Intelligence Expert Systems (IEA/1002-EIA), L.Monostori, J. Vancza, and M. Ali, eds., pp. 931-940, June 2001.
[12] A. Mitrovic, K. Koedinger, and B. Martin, “A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Tutoring and Constraint-Based Modeling,” Proc. Int'l Conf. User Modeling, pp. 313-322, 2003.
[13] T. Murray, “Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Analysis of the State of the Art,” Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence Education, vol. 10, pp. 98-129, 1999.
[14] T. Murray, S. Blessing, and S. Ainsworth, Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environment. Kluwer, 2003.
[15] P.I. Pavlik and J.R. Anderson, “Practice and Forgetting Effects on Vocabulary Memory: An Activation-Based Model of the Spacing Effect,” Cognitive Science, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 559-586, 2005.
[16] S. Ramachandran and R. Stottler, “A Meta-Cognitive Computer-Based Tutor for High-School Algebra,” Proc. World Conf. Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecomm., D. Lassner and C.McNaught, eds., pp. 911-914, 2003.
[17] L. Razzaq and N.T. Heffernan, “Scaffolding vs. Hints in the Assistment System,” Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Ikeda, Ashley, and Chan, eds., pp. 635-644, 2006.
[18] L. Razzaq, N. Heffernan, M. Feng, and Z. Pardos, “Developing Fine-Grained Transfer Models in the ASSISTment System,” J.Technology, Instruction, Cognition, Learning, vol. 5, no. 3, pp.289-304, 2007.
[19] L. Razzaq, N. Heffernan, K. Koedinger, M. Feng, G. Nuzzo-Jones, B. Junker, M. Macasek, K. Rasmussen, T. Turner, and J. Walonoski, “Blending Assessment and Instructional Assistance,” Intelligent Educational Machines within the Intelligent Systems Engineering Book Series, N. Nedjah, L. deMacedo Mourelle, M.N.Borges, and N.N. Almeida, eds., pp. 23-49, Springer, 2007.
[20] K. VanLehn, C. Lynch, K. Schulze, J.A. Shapiro, R. Shelby, L. Taylor, D. Treacy, A. Weinstein, and M. Wintersgill, “The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned,” Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1-47, 2005.
[21] K. VanLehn, Mind Bugs: The Origins of Procedural Misconceptions. MIT Press, 1990.
14 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool