The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - April-June (2009 vol.2)
pp: 121-134
Orla Lahart , National College of Ireland, Dublin
Declan Kelly , Trinity College, Dublin
Brendan Tangney , Trinity College, Dublin
ABSTRACT
Research suggests that parents with high levels of self-efficacy tend to make positive decisions about active engagement in the child's education, while parents with weak self-efficacy are often associated with less parental involvement. Therefore, endowing intelligent tutoring systems with the ability to adapt the level of support provided for the parent based on their self-efficacy may be of great benefit. Such a system might provide high levels of support for parents with low self-efficacy, while providing lower levels of support for parents with high self-efficacy. This paper explores the effect of using such an adaptive system in the home-tutoring context and, in particular, reports on two complementary empirical studies. In the first study, a dynamic self-efficacy model, learned from runtime self-report data is used to provide adaptive support for the parent. In the second empirical study, the dynamic self-efficacy model was expanded to allow parents to request for further support outside what is deemed necessary based on their self-efficacy model. Both studies comprised a control group which received full support regardless of their self-efficacy throughout the entire experiment. Results indicate clear increases in parental self-efficacy as a result of the provision of adaptive support throughout the home-tutoring process.
INDEX TERMS
Adaptive strategies, home-tutoring domain, parental self-efficacy, personalized support.
CITATION
Orla Lahart, Declan Kelly, Brendan Tangney, "Increasing Parental Self-Efficacy in a Home-Tutoring Environment", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.2, no. 2, pp. 121-134, April-June 2009, doi:10.1109/TLT.2009.20
REFERENCES
[1] G.E. Greenwood and C.W. Hickman, “Research and Practice in Parent Involvement: Implications for Teacher Education,” The Elementary School J., vol. 91, pp. 278-288, 1991.
[2] S.M. Dornbusch and P.L. Ritter, “Parents of High School Students: A Neglected Resource,” Educational Horizons, vol. 66, pp. 75-77, 1988.
[3] K.V. Hoover-Dempsey and H.M. Sandler, “Parental Involvement in Children's Education: Why Does It Make a Difference?” Teachers College Record, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 310-331, 1995.
[4] K.V. Hoover-Dempsey and H.M. Sandler, “Why do Parents Become Involved in Their Children's Education?” Rev. of Educational Research, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 3-42, 1997.
[5] C. Desforges and A. Abouchaar, “The Impact of Parental Involvement, Parental Support and Family Education on Pupil Achievement and Adjustment: A Literature Review,” Research Report RR433, Department for Education and Skills, 2003.
[6] A. Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, 1986.
[7] A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, 1997.
[8] P.R. Pintrich and E.V. De Groot, “Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance,” J.Educational Psychology, vol. 82, pp. 33-40, 1990.
[9] F. Pajares, “Current Directions in Self-Efficacy Research,” Proc. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 10, pp. 1-49, 1997.
[10] I. Brown and D.K. Inouye, “Learned Helplessness through Modeling: The Role of Perceived Similarity in Competence,” J.Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 36, pp. 900-908, 1978.
[11] A.L. Zeldin and F. Pajares, “Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women with Math-Related Careers,” Proc. Am. Educational Research Assoc., 1997.
[12] A. Bandura, “Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales,” Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, Y. Urdan and F. Pajares, eds., Information Age Publishing, pp. 307-337, 2006.
[13] B. Zimmerman, “Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 82-91, 2000.
[14] F. Bica, R. Verdin, and R.M. Vicari, “Using the Beliefs of Self-Efficacy to Improve the Effectiveness of ITS: An Empirical Study,” Proc. Fifth Mexican Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 2006.
[15] S.W. McQuiggan and J.C. Lester, “Diagnosing Self-Efficacy in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Empirical Study,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS '06), M. Ikeda, K.D. Ashley, and T-W.Chan eds., pp. 565-574, 2006.
[16] C.R. Beal, E. Shaw, Y. Chiu, H. Lee, H. Vilhjalmsson, and L. Qu, “Enhancing ITS Instruction with Integrated Assessments of Learner Mood, Motivation and Gender,” Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Education, July 2005.
[17] C.R. Beal and H. Lee, “Creating a Pedagogical Model that Uses Student Self Reports of Motivation and Mood to Adapt ITS Instruction,” Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence and Education, 2005.
[18] Y. Kim, “Empathetic Virtual Peers Enhanced Learner Interest and Self-Efficacy,” Workshop Motivation and Affect in Educational Software, Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED '05), July 2005.
[19] Y. Kim, Q. Wei, B. Xu, Y. Ko, and V. Ilieva, “MathGirls: Towards Developing Girls' Positive Attitude and Self-Efficacy through Pedagogical Agents,” Proc. 13th Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 110-126, 2007.
[20] B.F. Skinner, The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis, pp. 1-27. Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
[21] J. Holt and P. Farenga, Teach Your Own: The John Holt Book of Homeschooling, second ed. Da Capo Press, 2003.
[22] S. Suzuki, Nurtured by Love: The Classic Approach to Talent Education, second ed. Suzuki Method Int'l, 1986.
[23] E. Wenger, Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
[24] S. Suzuki, Suzuki Violin School: Violin Part, vol. 1. Summy-Birchard Inc., 1978.
[25] O. Lahart, D. Kelly, and B. Tangney, “P.A.C.T.—Scaffolding Best Practice in Home Tutoring,” Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS '06), pp. 615-625, June 2006.
[26] R.M. Gagne, The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, fourth ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1985.
[27] G. Weber and P. Brusilovsky, “ELM-ART: An Adaptive Versatile System for Web-Based Instruction,” Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, special issue on adaptive and intelligent Web-based educational systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 351-384, 2001.
[28] O. Lahart, D. Kelly, and B. Tangney, “Tutoring Strategies to Facilitate Positive Emotional States During Home Tutoring,” Workshop Modeling and Scaffolding Affective Experiences to Impact Learning Supplementary: Proc. 13th Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED '07), pp. 85-93, July 2007.
[29] O. Lahart, D. Kelly, and B. Tangney, “Towards Personalised Support for Home Tutors: Identification of Tutoring Rules,” Proc. World Conf. Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecomm. (EdMedia), pp. 2864-2870, June 2007.
[30] O. Lahart, D. Kelly, and B. Tangney, “Evaluation of PA.C.T.— Measuring Its Effect on the Home Tutoring Process,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Interactive Computer Aided Learning, 2008.
[31] O. Lahart, D. Kelly, and B. Tangney, “Eliciting Emotion—When & How?” Workshop Emotional and Cognitive Issues in ITS: Proc. Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS '08), http://www-etud.iro. umontreal.ca/~chaffars/ its2008_fichiersWECITS2008.pdf, 2008.
[32] O. Lahart, D. Kelly, and B. Tangney, “Development of a Dual User Adaptive Education System,” Proc. World Conf. Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecomm., pp. 1768-1778, 2008.
[33] B. Kort, R. Reilly, and R.W. Picard, “An Affective Model of Interplay between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy—Building a Learning Companion,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Advanced Learning Technologies, 2001.
[34] P. Archer and S. Weir, “Addressing Disadvantage: A Review of the International Literature and of the Strategy in Ireland,” Report to the Educational Disadvantage Committee, 2005.
[35] A. Sewell and A. St. George, “Developing Efficacy Beliefs in the Classroom,” J. Educational Enquiry, vol 1, no. 2, 2000.
33 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool