The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - January-March (2009 vol.2)
pp: 37-49
Mark Melia , Dublin City University, Dublin
Claus Pahl , Dublin City University, Dublin
ABSTRACT
Personalised e-learning allows the course creator to create courseware that dynamically adapts to the needs of individual learners or learner groupings. This dynamic nature of adaptive courseware makes it difficult to evaluate what the delivery time courseware will be for the learner. The course creator may attempt to validate adaptive courseware through dummy runs, but cannot eliminate the risk of pedagogical problems due to adaptive courseware's inherent variability. Courseware validation checks that adaptive courseware conforms to a set of pedagogical and non-pedagogical requirements. Validation of adaptive courseware limits the risk of pedagogical problems at delivery time. In this paper, we present our approach to adaptive courseware validation using the Courseware Authoring Validation Information Architecture (CAVIAr). We outline how CAVIAr captures adaptive courseware authoring concerns and validates courseware using a constraint-based approach. We also describe how CAVIAr can be integrated with the state of the art in adaptive e-learning and evaluate our validation approach.
INDEX TERMS
Validation, Curriculum, Accreditation
CITATION
Mark Melia, Claus Pahl, "Constraint-Based Validation of Adaptive e-Learning Courseware", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.2, no. 1, pp. 37-49, January-March 2009, doi:10.1109/TLT.2009.7
REFERENCES
[1] D. Dagger, “Personalised eLearning Development Environments,” PhD dissertation, Univ. of Dublin, 2006.
[2] A. Cristea, D. Smits, and P. de Bra, “Towards a Generic Adaptive Hypermedia Platform: A Conversion Case Study,” J. Digital Information, vol. 8, no. 3, http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/ 231184, 2007.
[3] J.W. Samples, “The Pedagogy of Technology—Our Next Frontier?” Connexions, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 4-5, 2002.
[4] P.V. Rosmalen, H. Vogten, R.V. Es, H. Passier, P. Poelmans, and R. Koper, “Authoring a Full Life Cycle Model in Standards-Based, Adaptive e-Learning,” J. Educational Technology and Soc., vol. 9, no. 1, pp.72-83, 2006.
[5] J. Jovanović, “Generating Context-Related Feedback for Teachers,” Int'l J. Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 1, nos.1-2, pp.47-69, 2008.
[6] W. Dick and L.M. Carey, “Formative Evaluation,” Instructional Design: Principles and Applications, second ed., pp.227-267, Educational Technology Publications, 1991.
[7] L.M. Carey and W. Dick, “Summative Evaluation,” Instructional Design: Principles and Applications, second ed., pp.269-311, Educational Technology Publications, 1991.
[8] P. Brusilovsky and J. Vassileva, “Course Sequencing Techniques for Large-Scale Web-Based Education,” Int'l J. Continuing Eng. Education and Lifelong Learning, vol. 13, nos.1-2, pp.75-94, 2003.
[9] M. Baldoni, C. Baroglio, and V. Patti, “Web-Based Adaptive Tutoring: An Approach Based on Logic Agents and Reasoning about Actions,” Artificial Intelligence Rev., vol. 22, pp.3-39, 2004.
[10] D. Djurić, D. Gaševic, and V. Devedžic, “The Tao of Modeling Spaces,” J. Object Technology, vol. 6, 2006.
[11] J.B Warmer and A. Kleppe, The Object Constraint Language, second ed. Addison Wesley, 2003.
[12] A.I. Cristea and M. Verschoor, “The LAG Grammar for Authoring the Adaptive Web,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC '04), vol. 1, pp.382-386, Apr. 2004.
[13] A. Berlanga and F.J. García, “Towards Reusable Adaptive Rules,” Proc. Int'l Workshop Adaptive Hypermedia and Collaborative Web-Based Systems (AHCW '04), July 2004.
[14] A.I Cristea, D. Smits, and P. De Bra, “Writing MOT, Reading AHA!—Converting Between an Authoring and a Delivery System for Adaptive Educational Hypermedia,” Proc. Third Int'l Workshop Authoring of Adaptive and Adaptable Educational Hypermedia, http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/acristea/HTML/AIED05 5-10-cristea4-.pdf, June 2003.
[15] A.I Cristea and A. de Mooij, “LAOS: Layered WWW AHS Authoring Model and Their Corresponding Algebraic Operators,” Proc. 12th Int'l World Wide Web Conf. (WWW '03), May 2003.
[16] P. De Bra and L. Calvi, “AHA!: A Generic Adaptive Hypermedia System,” Proc. Second Workshop Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/ah98Proceedings.html , Eindhoven University of Tech nology, June 1998.
[17] A. Moore, T.J. Brailsford, and C.D. Stewart, “Personally Tailored Teaching in Whurle Using Conditional Transclusion,” Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Hypertext and Hypermedia (HYPERTEXT '01), pp.163-164, 2001.
[18] H. Hummel, J. Manderveld, C. Tattersall, and R. Koper, “Educational Modelling Language and Learning Design: New Opportunities for Instructional Reusability and Personalised Learning,” Int'l J. Learning Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.110-126, 2004.
[19] D. Hernández-Leo, E.D. Villasclaras-Fernández, J.I. Asensio-Pérez, Y. Dimitriadis, I.M. Jorrín-Abellán, I. Ruiz-Requies, and B. Rubia-Avi, “Collage: A Collaborative Learning Design Editor Based on Patterns,” Educational Technology and Soc., vol. 9, no. 1, pp.58-71, 2006.
[20] M. Melia and C. Pahl, “An Information Architecture for Validating Courseware,” Proc. First Int'l Workshop Learning Object Discovery and Exchange (LODE '07), Sept. 2007.
[21] A. Miles and D. Brickley, “SKOS Core Guide,” Technical Report, 2005.
[22] R. Gagné, W. Wager, K. Golas, and J. Keller, Principles of Instructional Design, fifth ed. Wadsworth, 2005.
[23] N. Stash , A. Cristea, and P. DeBra, “Authoring of Learning Styles in Adaptive Hypermedia: Problems and Solutions,” Proc. 13th Int'l World Wide Web Conf. Alternate Track Papers and Posters (WWW Alt. '04), pp.114-123, 2004.
[24] “LTSC WG12: Learning Object Metadata,” IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee, 2002.
[25] A. ADL, “SCORM 2004 Overview,” http://www.adlnet.gov/scormindex.cfm, 2004.
[26] M. Melia, “Constraint-Based Validation of Courseware Using Model-Driven Engineering,” PhD dissertation, Dublin City Univ., 2009.
[27] C.M. Reigeluth, “What is Instructional-Design Theory and How Is It Changing?” Instructional-Design: Theories and Models, A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, vol. 2, pp.5-30, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1999.
[28] R.E Mayer, Designing Instruction for Constructivist Learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1999.
[29] C.M. Reigeluth, ed., “The Elaboration Theory: Guidance for Scope and Sequencing Decisions,” Instructional Design: Theories and Models, vol. 2, pp.425-453. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1999.
[30] M. Melia and C. Pahl, “Towards the Validation of Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Using CAVIAr,” Proc. Sixth Int'l Workshop Authoring Adaptive and Adaptable Hypermedia (A3H '08), July 2008.
[31] F. Budinsky, S.A. Brodsky, and E. Merks, Eclipse Modeling Framework. Pearson Education, 2003.
[32] F. Jouault and I. Kurtev, “Transforming Models with ATL,” Proc. Model Transformations in Practice Workshop (MoDELS '05), Oct. 2005.
[33] G. Guizzardi, L.F. Pires, and M. van Sinderen, “Ontology-Based Evaluation and Design of Domain-Specific Visual Modeling Languages,” Proc. 14th Int'l Conf. Information Systems Development, pp.691-705, 2005.
[34] C.M. Reigeluth, Instructional Design: Theories and Models, vol. 2. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1999.
[35] U.T Janjua, “Model Based OCL Generation,” MS thesis, Dublin City Univ., 2008.
[36] M. Baldoni, C. Baroglio, V. Patti, and L. Torasso, “Reasoning About Learning Object Metadata for Adapting SCORM Courseware,” Proc. Int'l Workshop Eng. Adaptive Web: Methods and Technologies for Personalization and Adaptation in the Semantic Web (EAW2 '04), pp. 4-13, Aug. 2004.
20 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool