The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - July-September (2008 vol.1)
pp: 157-164
Chee-Kit Looi , National Institute of Education, Singapore
Chiu-Pin Lin , National Hsinchu University of Education, Taiwan
Kuo-Ping Liu , National Central University, Taiwan
ABSTRACT
Jigsaw method empowers students to build their own knowledge through interactively communicating and discussing in group-based cooperation. However, when students return to their original group to share with teammates what they have learned in their expert groups, they may need to review the records of the previous discussion in order to integrate and share the key ideas arising from that discussion. Paper-and-pencil records often do not meet students? in-time need, thereby affecting the learning process. Group Scribbles (GS) is an activity tool that enables the collaborative generation, collection and aggregation of ideas through a shared space. The aim of this study is to deploy GS with Tablet PCs to facilitate 12 graduate school students doing cooperative learning by the jigsaw method and to examine how GS supports knowledge building and deeper understanding through interactive questioning, dialogue and continuous improvement of ideas. Results of this exploratory study suggest that GS-mediated cooperative learning jigsaw model could positively benefit students in their interaction and knowledge building processes.
INDEX TERMS
Collaborative learning, Computer-assisted instruction, Computer science education
CITATION
Chee-Kit Looi, Chiu-Pin Lin, Kuo-Ping Liu, "Group Scribbles to Support Knowledge Building in Jigsaw Method", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.1, no. 3, pp. 157-164, July-September 2008, doi:10.1109/TLT.2008.20
REFERENCES
[1] E. Aronson and S. Patnoe, The Jigsaw Classroom: Building Cooperation in the Classroom, second ed. Addison Wesley Longman, 1997.
[2] N.L. Kerr and S.E. Bruun, “Dispensability of Member Effort and Group Motivation Losses: Free Rider Effects,” J. Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 44, pp. 78-94, 1983.
[3] SRI International, http:/Group Scribbles.sri.com/, 2006.
[4] J. Roschelle, D. Tatar, S.R. Chaudhury, Y. Dimitriadis, C. Patton, and C. DiGiano, “Ink, Improvisation, and Interactive Engagement: Learning with Tablets,” Computer, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 42-48, Sept. 2007.
[5] F.-K. Ng, C.-K. Looi, and W. Chen, “Rapid Collaborative Knowledge Building: Lessons Learned from Two Primary Science Classrooms,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Learning Sciences (ICLS '08), 2008.
[6] W. Chen and C.-K. Looi, “Enhancing Learning by Rapid Collaborative Knowledge Building in Two Science Classrooms,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Computers in Education (ICCE '08), IOS Press, 2008.
[7] M. Scardamalia and C. Bereiter, “Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology,” Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, K.Sawyer, ed., pp. 97-118, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006.
[8] M. Scardamalia and C. Bereiter, “Knowledge Building,” Encyclopedia of Education, second ed., p. 5, Macmillan Reference, 2003.
[9] M. Scardamalia, “Collective Cognitive Responsibility for the Advancement of Knowledge,” Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society, B. Smith, ed., pp.76-98, Open Court, 2002.
[10] D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning, fourth ed. Allyn & Bacon, 1994.
[11] D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn & Bacon, 1999.
[12] B.J. Millis and P.G. Cottell, Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty, p. 194. Oryx Press, 1998.
[13] L.M. Morrow and E. Asbury, Best Practices for a Balanced Early Literacy Program, pp. 49-67. Guilford, 1999.
[14] T.M. Lindquist, “An Experimental Test of Cooperative Learning with Faculty Members as Subjects,” J. Education for Business, vol. 72, pp. 157-163, 1997.
[15] J.C. Colosi and C.R. Zales, “Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Improves Biology Lab Courses,” BioScience, vol. 48, pp. 118-124, 1998.
[16] A. Charania, “Playing Jigsaw: A Cooperative Learning Experience,” J.Nursing Education, vol. 40, pp. 420-421, 2001.
[17] M. Lorenzen, “Encouraging Community in Library Instruction: A Jigsaw Experiment in a University Library Skills Classroom,” Illinois Libraries, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 5-14, 2003.
[18] Y. Lai and C.C. Wu, “Using Handhelds in a Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Environment,” J. Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 284-297, 2006.
[19] R.E. Slavin, “Ability Grouping and Student Achievement,” Rev. Educational Research, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 293-336, 1987.
[20] J. Piaget, “Piaget's Theory,” Handbook of Child Psychology, fourthed. P.Mussen, ed., vol. 1, Wiley, 1983.
[21] C. Norris and E. Soloway, “The Viable Alternative: Handhelds,” School Administrator, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 26-28, 2003.
[22] M. McCullough, Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. MIT Press, 1996.
[23] C. Di Giano, D. Tatar, and K. Kireyev, “Learning from the Post-It: Building Collective Intelligence through Lightweight, Flexible Technology,” Proc. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '06), 2006.
[24] C.P. Lin, S.S.C. Young, and Y.H. Chen, “Teacher-Oriented Adaptive Web-Based Environment for Supporting Practical Teaching Models: A Case Study of ‘School for All’,” J. Computers and Education, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 155-172, 2005.
[25] M. Scardamalia and C. Bereiter, “Schools as Knowledge-Building Organizations,” Today's Children, Tomorrow's Society: The Developmental Health and Wealth of Nations, D. Keating and C. Hertzman, eds., pp.274-289, Guilford, 1999.
14 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool