The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - January-March (2008 vol.1)
pp: 11-19
Giuliana Dettori , CNR, Genova
Donatella Persico , CNR, Genova
ABSTRACT
Interaction analysis is increasingly used to study learning dynamics within online communities. This paper aims to investigate whether Interaction Analysis can help understand the practice and development of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) in Virtual Learning Communities (VLC). To this end, a set of SRL indicators is proposed to spot clues of self-regulated events within students' messages. Such clues have been identified and classified according to Zimmerman's SRL model and some subsequent studies concerning SRL in Technology Enhanced Learning Environments (TELEs). They have been tested on the online component of a blended course for trainee teachers, by analysing the messages exchanged by a group of learners in two modules of the course. The results of this analysis have been compared with those of a previous study carried out with more traditional methods on the same course. The similarity of the results obtained by the two approaches suggests that Interaction Analysis is an effective, though rather labour-intensive, methodology to study SRL in online learning communities.
INDEX TERMS
Computers and Education, Collaborative learning
CITATION
Giuliana Dettori, Donatella Persico, "Detecting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Communities by Means of Interaction Analysis", IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol.1, no. 1, pp. 11-19, January-March 2008, doi:10.1109/TLT.2008.7
REFERENCES
[1] B.J. Zimmerman, “Developing Self-Fulfilling Cycles of Academic Regulation: An Analysis of Exemplary Instructional Models,” Self-Regulated Learning. From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice, Shunk and Zimmermann, eds., pp. 1-19, The Guildford Press, 1998.
[2] B.J. Zimmerman, “Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective,” Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, eds., pp. 13-39, Academic Press, 2000.
[3] M. Boekaerts, “Self-Regulated Learning: Where We Are Today,” Int'l J. Educational Research, vol. 31, pp. 445-457, 1999.
[4] M. Boekaerts, “Self-Regulated Learning: A New Concept Embraced by Researchers, Policy Makers, Educators, Teachers and Students,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 161-186, 1997.
[5] D.H. Schunk and B.J. Zimmerman, Self-Regulated Learning, from Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice. The Guilford Press, 1998.
[6] G. Corrigan and N. Taylor, “An Explanatory Study of the Effect a Self-Regulated Learning Environment Has on Pre-Service Primary Teachers' Perceptions of Teaching Science and Technology,” Int'l J. Science and Math. Education, vol. 2, pp. 45-62, 2004.
[7] S. Bolhuis, “Towards Process-Oriented Teaching for Self-Directed Lifelong Learning: A Multidimensional Perspective,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 13, pp. 327-347, 2003.
[8] K. Steffens, “Self-Regulated Learning in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: Lessons of a European Peer Review,” European J. Education, vol. 41, nos. 3/4, pp. 353-380, 2006.
[9] G. Van den Boom, F. Paas, J.J.G. Van Merrienboer, and T. Van Gog, “Reflection Prompts and Tutor Feedback in a Web-Based Learning Environments: Effects on Students' Self-Regulated Learning Competence,” Computer in Human Behavior, vol. 20, pp.551-567, 2004.
[10] G. Dettori, T. Giannetti, and D. Persico, “SRL in Online Cooperative Learning: Implications for Pre-Service Teacher Training,” European J. Education, vol. 41, nos. 3/4, pp. 397-414, 2006.
[11] J.B. Arbaugh, “Learning to Learn Online: A Study of Perceptual Changes between Multiple Online Course Experiences,” Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, pp. 169-182, 2004.
[12] R. Lynch and M. Dembo, “The Relationship between Self-Regulation and On-Line Learning in a Blended Learning Context,” Int'l Rev. Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 5, no. 2,http://www.irrodl.org/content/v5.2lynch-dembo.html , 2004.
[13] L. Rourke, T. Anderson, D.R. Garrison, and W. Archer, “Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts,” Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 12, pp. 8-22, 2001.
[14] D.R. Garrison, T. Anderson, and W. Archer, “Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 2, nos. 2/3, pp. 87-105, 1999.
[15] F. Pozzi, S. Manca, D. Persico, and L. Sarti, “A General Framework for Tracking and Analysing Learning Processes in CSCL Environments,” Innovations in Education and Teaching Int'l, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 169-179, 2007.
[16] W. Potter and Levine-Donnersteirn, “Rething Validity and Reliability in Content Analysis,” J. Applied Comm. Research, vol. 27, pp. 258-284, 1999.
[17] B.J. Zimmerman, “Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis,” Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement, B.J. Zimmerman and D.H. Schunk, eds., pp. 1-37, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 2001.
[18] P. Banyard, J. Underwood, and A. Twiner, “Do Enhanced Communication Technologies Inhibit or Facilitate Self-Regulated Learning?” European J. Education, vol. 41, nos. 3/4, 2006.
[19] “Self-Regulated Learning in Technology Enhanced Learning Environments,” Proc. Targeted Cooperative Network Conf. (TACONET '05), R. Carneiro, K. Steffens, and J. Underwood, eds., 2005.
[20] M. Delfino, S. Manca, and D. Persico, “Harmonizing the Online and Face-to-Face Components in a Blended Course on Educational Technology,” Proc. Int'l Educational Technology Conf. (IETC), May 2007.
[21] B. De Wever, T. Schellens, M. Valke, and H. Van Keer, “Content Analysis Schemes to Analyze Transcripts of Online Asynchronous Discussion Groups: A Review,” Computers and Education, vol. 46, pp. 6-28, 2005.
[22] M. Capozzoli, L. McSweeney, and D. Sinha, “Beyond Kappa: A Review of Interrater Agreement Measures,” The Canadian J. Statistics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3-23, 1999.
5 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool