The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Orlando, Florida
Oct. 12, 2003 to Oct. 15, 2003
ISBN: 0-7695-2039-1
pp: 288
Alma Riska , Seagate Research
Erik Riedel , Seagate Research
ABSTRACT
Storage system designers prefer to limit the maximum queue length at individual disks to only a few outstanding requests, to avoid possible request starvation. In this paper, we evaluate the benefits and performance implications of allowing disks to queue more requests. We show that the average response time in the storage subsystem is reduced when queuing more requests and optimizing (based on seek and/or position time) request scheduling at the disk. We argue that the disk, as the only service center in a storage subsystem, is able to best utilize its resources via scheduling when it has the most complete view of the load it is about to process. The benefits of longer queues at the disks are even more obvious when the system operates under transient overload conditions.
INDEX TERMS
disk scheduling, unfair scheduling, response time distribution, request starvation
CITATION
Alma Riska, Erik Riedel, "It?s not fair - evaluating efficient disk scheduling", MASCOTS, 2003, 2012 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 2012 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems 2003, pp. 288, doi:10.1109/MASCOT.2003.1240673
26 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool