This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
18th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'96)
A systematic survey of CMM experience and results
Berlin, GERMANY
March 25-March 29
ISBN: 0-8186-7246-3
J.D. Herbsleb, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA
D.R. Goldenson, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA
The capability maturity model (CMM) for software has become very influential as a basis for software process improvement (SPI). Most of the evidence to date showing the results of these efforts has consisted of case studies. We present a systematic survey of organizations that have undertaken CMM-based SPI to get more representative results. We found evidence that process maturity is in fact associated with better organizational performance, and that software process appraisals are viewed, in retrospect, as extremely valuable and accurate guides for the improvement effort. The path was not always smooth, however, and efforts generally took longer and cost more than expected. A number of factors that distinguished highly successful from unsuccessful efforts are identified. Most of these factors are under management control, suggesting that a number of specific management decisions are likely to have a major impact on the success of the effort.
Index Terms:
software engineering; software development management; reviews; survey; CMM experience; capability maturity model; software process improvement; case studies; process maturity; organizational performance; software process appraisals; cost; management control; management decisions
Citation:
J.D. Herbsleb, D.R. Goldenson, "A systematic survey of CMM experience and results," icse, pp.323, 18th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'96), 1996
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.