This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Fourth IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'05)
Testing learning strategies
Irvine, CA, USA
July 31-July 31
ISBN: 0-7803-9136-5
M. Hidalgo-Herrero, Dept. Didactica de las Matematicas Fac. de Educacion, Univ. Complutense de Madrid, Spain
I. Rodriguez, Dept. of Comput. Sci., The Univ. of Calgary, Alta., Canada
F. Rubio, Dept. of Comput. Sci., The Univ. of Calgary, Alta., Canada
In this paper we present an experiment designed to test whether an automatic system can learn a set of rules in a similar way as human beings learn the same set of rules. In order to do that, we have conducted two experiments. The first of them has been done with a group of seventy people, while the second one has been done by running an automatic learning system designed by ourselves. The paper contains the results of both tests, and a comparison of the learning curves of both types of subjects: humans and automatic agents. We also analyze the differences and similarities by considering how humans and agents construct their knowledge about the rules. By using both types of analysis, we study how close is the learning process of our automatic agents to obtaining a success in a Turing test.
Citation:
M. Hidalgo-Herrero, I. Rodriguez, F. Rubio, "Testing learning strategies," icci, pp.212-221, Fourth IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'05), 2005
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.