This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
What happened to the crypto dream?, Part 2
May-June 2013 (vol. 11 no. 3)
pp. 68-71
Arvind Narayanan, Princeton University
Despite privacy-preserving cryptography technologies' potential, they've largely failed to find commercial adoption. Reasons include people's unawareness of privacy-preserving cryptography, developers' lack of expertise, the field's complexity, economic constraints, and trust issues. View part 1 of this article (from the March/April 2013 issue) here: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MSP.2013.45.
Index Terms:
Cryptography,Software deveopment,Data privacy,Commercialization,Marketing and sales,Performance evaluation,Computer security,cryptography,Cryptography,Software deveopment,Data privacy,Commercialization,Marketing and sales,Performance evaluation,Computer security,security,Cryptography,Software deveopment,Data privacy,Commercialization,Marketing and sales,Performance evaluation,Computer security,privacy,crypto
Citation:
Arvind Narayanan, "What happened to the crypto dream?, Part 2," IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 68-71, May-June 2013, doi:10.1109/MSP.2013.75
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.