The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - Nov.-Dec. (2012 vol.10)
pp: 52-62
Fernando Alonso-Fernandez , Halmstad University
Julian Fierrez , Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Javier Ortega-Garcia , Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
ABSTRACT
Biometric technology has been increasingly deployed in the past decade, offering greater security and convenience than traditional methods of personal recognition. Although biometric signals' quality heavily affects a biometric system's performance, prior research on evaluating quality is limited. Quality is a critical issue in security, especially in adverse scenarios involving surveillance cameras, forensics, portable devices, or remote access through the Internet. This article analyzes what factors negatively impact biometric quality, how to overcome them, and how to incorporate quality measures into biometric systems. A review of the state of the art in these matters gives an overall framework for the challenges of biometric quality.
INDEX TERMS
Biometrics, Iris recognition, Network security, Quality assessment, Surveillance, Cameras, Access controls, Face recognition, Authentication, computer security, biometrics, security, quality assessment, sample quality, personal recognition
CITATION
Fernando Alonso-Fernandez, Julian Fierrez, Javier Ortega-Garcia, "Quality Measures in Biometric Systems", IEEE Security & Privacy, vol.10, no. 6, pp. 52-62, Nov.-Dec. 2012, doi:10.1109/MSP.2011.178
REFERENCES
1. P. Grother and E. Tabassi, “Performance of Biometric Quality Measures,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 4, 2007, pp. 531–543.
2. A.K. Jain and A. Kumar, “Biometrics of Next Generation: An Overview,” Second Generation Biometrics, Springer, 2010.
3. A.K. Jain, B. Klare, and U. Park, “Face Recognition: Some Challenges in Forensics,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 11), IEEE, 2011, pp. 726–733.
4. J. Ortega-Garcia et al., “The Multi-scenario Multi-environment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB),” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 32, no. 6, 2009, pp. 1097–1111.
5. E.P. Kukula, M.J. Sutton, and S.J. Elliott, “The Human-Biometric-Sensor Interaction Evaluation Method: Biometric Performance and Usability Measurements,” IEEE Trans. Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 59, no. 4, 2010, pp. 784–791.
6. J.-C. Fondeur, “Thoughts and Figures on Quality Measurements,” US Nat'l Inst. Standards and Technology, 2006; http://biometrics.nist.gov/cs_links/quality/ workshopI/procfondeur_quality_1.0.pdf .
7. T. Mansfield, “The Application of Quality Scores in Biometric Recognition,” US Nat'l Inst. Standards and Technology, 2007; http://biometrics.nist.gov/cs_links/quality/ workshopII/procmansfield_07-11-07_NISTQWkshp.pdf .
8. M. Theofanos et al., “Biometrics Systematic Uncertainty and the User,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS 07), IEEE, 2007, pp. 1–6.
9. F. Alonso-Fernandez, “Biometric Sample Quality and Its Application to Multimodal Authentication Systems,” doctoral dissertation, Dept. Signals, Systems, and Radiocommunications, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2008.
10. F. Alonso-Fernandez et al., “Quality-Based Conditional Processing in Multi-biometrics: Application to Sensor Interoperability,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, vol. 40, no. 6, 2010, pp. 1168–1179.
11. F. Alonso-Fernandez et al., “A Comparative Study of Fingerprint Image Quality Estimation Methods,” IEEE Trans. Information Forensics and Security, vol. 2, no. 4, 2007, pp. 734–743.
12. N.D. Kalka et al., “Estimating and Fusing Quality Factors for Iris Biometric Images,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 40, no. 3, 2010, pp. 509–524.
13. A. Harriero et al., “Analysis of the Utility of Classical and Novel Speech Quality Measures for Speaker Verification,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Biometrics (ICB), LNCS 5558, Springer, 2009, pp. 434–442.
14. D.P. D'Amato, N. Hall, and D. McGarry,“The Specification and Measurement of Face Image Quality,” US Nat'l Inst. Standards and Technology, 2010; http://biometrics.nist.gov/cs_links/ibpc2010/ pdfsDAmato_Daon_The%20Specification%20and%20Measurementof%20Face%20Image%20Quality-Final.pdf .
15. N. Houmani, S. Garcia-Salicetti, and B. Dorizzi, “A Novel Personal Entropy Measure Confronted with Online Signature Verification Systems Performance,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS 08), IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–6.
16. R. Youmaran and A. Adler, “Measuring Biometric Sample Quality in Terms of Biometric Information,” Proc. Biometric Consortium Conf.: Special Session on Research at the Biometrics Symp., IEEE, 2006, pp. 1–6.
17. A. Adler and T. Dembinsky, “Human vs. Automatic Measurement of Biometric Sample Quality,” Proc. Canadian Conf. Electrical and Computer Eng. (CCECE 06), IEEE CS, 2006, pp. 2090–2093.
18. K.E. Wertheim, “Human Factors in Large-Scale Biometric Systems: A Study of the Human Factors Related to Errors in Semiautomatic Fingerprint Biometrics,” IEEE Systems J., vol. 4, no. 2, 2010, pp. 138–146.
19. A. Rattani et al., “Template Update Methods in Adaptive Biometric Systems: A Critical Review,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Biometrics (ICB), LNCS 5558, Springer, 2009, pp. 847–856.
20. T. Ko and R. Krishnan, “Monitoring and Reporting of Fingerprint Image Quality and Match Accuracy for a Large User Application,” Proc. 33rd Applied Image Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 04), IEEE CS, 2004, pp. 159–164.
21. E. Tabassi and P. Grother, “Biometric Sample Quality, Standardization,” Encyclopedia of Biometrics, S.Z. Li ed., Springer, 2009; www.springerreference.com/docs/html/chapterdbid 70982.html.
33 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool