The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - July-Aug. (2012 vol.10)
pp: 44-49
Sergio Sánchez García , Technical University of Madrid
Ana Gómez Oliva , Technical University of Madrid
Emilia Pérez-Belleboni , Technical University of Madrid
ABSTRACT
European public administrations must manage citizens' digital identities, particularly considering interoperability among different countries. Owing to the diversity of electronic identity management (eIDM) systems, when users of one such system seek to communicate with governments using a different system, both systems must be linked and understand each other. To achieve this, the European Union is working on an interoperability framework. This article provides an overview of eIDM systems' current state at a pan-European level. It identifies and analyzes issues on which agreement exists, as well as those that aren't yet resolved and are preventing the adoption of a large-scale model.
INDEX TERMS
Europe, Authentication, Identity management systems, Privacy, Government policies, Digital systems, privacy, electronic identify management system, eIDM, identify management, authentication, transborder data flow, distributed objects, data mapping, computer security
CITATION
Sergio Sánchez García, Ana Gómez Oliva, Emilia Pérez-Belleboni, "Is Europe Ready for a Pan-European Identity Management System?", IEEE Security & Privacy, vol.10, no. 4, pp. 44-49, July-Aug. 2012, doi:10.1109/MSP.2012.58
REFERENCES
1. Modinis Study on Identity Management in eGovernment, tech. report, European Commission, 2006; http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/ activities/ict_psp/documentseidm_conceptual_framework.pdf .
2. P. Bruegger, D. Hühnlein, and J. Schwenk, “TLS-Federation—a Secure and Relying-Party-Friendly Approach for Federated Identity Management,” Proc. Special Interest Group on Biometrics and Electronic Signatures (BIOSIG 08), Gesellschaft für Informatik, 2008, pp. 93–106.
3. A Roadmap for a Pan-European eIDM Framework by 2010, ver. 1.0, European Commission Information Soc. and Media Directorate-General, 2007; http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/ activities/egovernment/docs/pdfeidm_roadmap_paper.pdf .
4. “Federated Identity,” Modinis-IDM consortium, 2005; https://www.cosic.esat.kuleuven.be/modinis-idm/ twiki/bin/view.cgi/MainFederatedIdentity .
5. C. Steel, R. Nagappan, and R. Lai, Core Security Patterns: Best Practices and Strategies for J2EE, Web Services, and Identity Management, Prentice Hall, 2005.
6. i2010 eGovernment Action Plan: Accelerating eGovernment in Europe for the Benefit of All, Commission of the European Communities, 2006; http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServLexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0173:FIN:EN:PDF .
7. J. Majava and H. Graux, eID Interoperability for PEGS: Common Specifications for eID Interoperability in the eGovernment Context, tech. report, European Communities, 2007; http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servletsDoc467b.pdf?id=30989 .
8. B. Hulsebosch, G. Lenzini, and H. Eertink, Quality Authenticator Scheme D2.3, ICT Policy Support Programme, 2009.
66 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool