The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.05 - September/October (2009 vol.7)
pp: 14-20
Ioannis Avramopoulos , Deutsche Telekom Laboratories
ABSTRACT
The Domain Name System is a critical piece of the Internet and supports most Internet applications. Because it's organized in a hierarchy, its correct operation depends on the availability of just a few servers at the hierarchy's upper levels. These backbone servers are vulnerable to routing attacks in which adversaries controlling part of the routing system try to hijack the server address space. Using routing attacks in this way, an adversary can compromise the Internet's availability and integrity at a global scale. In this article, the authors evaluate the relative resilience to routing attacks of two alternative anycast DNS implementations. The first operates at the network layer and the second at the application layer. The evaluation informs fundamental DNS design decisions and an important debate on the routing architecture of the Internet.
INDEX TERMS
Domain Name System, DNS, anycast, secure routing
CITATION
Ioannis Avramopoulos, "Protecting the DNS from Routing Attacks: Two Alternative Anycast Implementations", IEEE Security & Privacy, vol.7, no. 5, pp. 14-20, September/October 2009, doi:10.1109/MSP.2009.131
REFERENCES
1. Y. Rekhter, T. Li, and S. Hares, A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), IETF RFC 4271, Jan. 2006; www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4271.txt.
2. S. Kent, C. Lynn, and K. Seo, "Secure Border Gateway Protocol (Secure-BGP)," IEEE J. Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 18, no. 4, 2000, pp. 582–592.
3. L. Wang et al., "Protecting BGP Routes to Top-Level DNS Servers," IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 14, no. 9, 2003, pp. 851–860.
4. C. Partridge, T. Mendez, and W. Milliken, Host Anycasting Service, IETF RFC 1546, Nov. 1993; www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1546.txt.
5. E. Zegura et al., "Application-Layer Anycasting: A Server Selection Architecture and Use in a Replicated Web Service," IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 8, no. 4, 2000, pp. 455–466.
6. M. Suchara and I. Avramopoulos, Comparing the Security Performance of Network-Layer and Application-Layer Anycast, tech. report TR-849-09, Computer Science Dept., Princeton Univ., Apr. 2009.
7. R. Chandramouli and S. Rose, "Challenges in Securing the Domain Name System," IEEE Security &Privacy, vol. 4, no. 1, 2006, pp. 84–87.
8. I. Avramopoulos, M. Suchara, and J. Rexford, How Small Groups Can Secure Interdomain Routing, tech. report TR-808-07, Computer Science Dept., Princeton Univ., Dec. 2007.
9. H. Ballani and P. Francis, "Towards a Global IP Anycast Service," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Rev., vol. 35, no. 4, 2005, pp. 301–312.
5 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool