| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
| | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Atish Sinha, Hemant Jain, "Ease of Reuse: An Empirical Comparison of Components and Objects," IEEE Software, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 1, , 5555. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/MS.2012.131, author = {Atish Sinha and Hemant Jain}, title = {Ease of Reuse: An Empirical Comparison of Components and Objects}, journal ={IEEE Software}, volume = {99}, number = {1}, issn = {0740-7459}, year = {5555}, pages = {1}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2012.131}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - IEEE Software TI - Ease of Reuse: An Empirical Comparison of Components and Objects IS - 1 SN - 0740-7459 SP EP EPD - 1 A1 - Atish Sinha, A1 - Hemant Jain, PY - 5555 VL - 99 JA - IEEE Software ER - | |||
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2012.131
Component-based development is a relatively new paradigm for software development, compared to more established approaches such as object-oriented analysis and design. In this study, we examine the ease of reuse perceptions of analysts in modeling business systems using a library of components vis-à-vis a library of objects. We designed and administered a survey to assess the “ease of reuse” of the two types of assets. We found that IT professionals perceive components to be much easier to reuse than objects. They also expressed significantly higher satisfaction with components and, by a large majority, preferred reusing components to reusing objects.
Citation:
Atish Sinha, Hemant Jain, "Ease of Reuse: An Empirical Comparison of Components and Objects," IEEE Software, 10 Sept. 2012. IEEE computer Society Digital Library. IEEE Computer Society, <http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2012.131>
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.

