The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - Nov.-Dec. (2013 vol.30)
pp: 17-23
Ulrike Abelein , University of Heidelberg
Helen Sharp , The Open University
Barbara Paech , University of Heidelberg
ABSTRACT
Researchers have studied how best to involve users in software development for a long time, primarily in the area of information systems and human-computer interaction. The authors consider the effects of both user participation and user involvement, which they abbreviate to UPI. Existing research describes several benefits of UPI, such as improved quality due to more precise requirements, the prevention of unneeded and expensive features, and an increase in user satisfaction, which leads to higher system use. But even though some researchers consider it to be essential to system success, other studies have found contradicting results. Furthermore, it's not a common practice in today's IT projects to involve users to a large extent. To clarify UPI's effects on system success and to get a deeper understanding of the differences between user participation and user involvement, the authors reviewed the existing UPI literature in software development and conducted a systematic mapping study.
INDEX TERMS
User centered design, Software development, Prototypes, Time measurement, Software systems,meta analysis, user participation, user involvement, software development, systematic mapping study, literature review
CITATION
Ulrike Abelein, Helen Sharp, Barbara Paech, "Does Involving Users in Software Development Really Influence System Success?", IEEE Software, vol.30, no. 6, pp. 17-23, Nov.-Dec. 2013, doi:10.1109/MS.2013.124
REFERENCES
1. N. Iivari, “Enculturation of User Involvement in Software Development Organizations: An Interpretive Case Study in the Product Development Context,” Proc. 3rd Nordic Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI 04), ACM Int'l Conf. Proc. Series, vol. 82, 2004, pp. 287-296.
2. H. Barki and J. Hartwick, “Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement,” Management Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, 1989, pp. 53-63.
3. T. McGill and J. Klobas, “User Developed Application Success: Sources and Effects of Involvement,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 27, no. 5, 2008, pp. 407-422.
4. M. Harris and H. Weistroffer, “A New Look at the Relationship between User Involvement in Systems Development and System Success Development and System Success,” Comm. Assoc. Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, 2009, pp. 739-756.
5. U. Abelein and B. Paech, “Understanding the Influence of User Participation and Involvement on System Success: A Systematic Mapping Study,” to appear in Empirical Software Eng., 2013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007s10664-013-9278-4 .
6. S. Kujala, “Effective User Involvement in Product Development by Improving the Analysis Of User Needs,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 27, no. 6, 2008, pp. 457-473.
7. J. Gould and C. Lewis, “Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think,” Comm. ACM, vol. 28, no. 3, 1985, pp. 300-311.
8. D. Dean et al., “Enabling the Effective Involvement of Multiple Users: Methods and Tools for Collaborative Software Engineering,” J. Management Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, 1998, pp. 179-222.
9. M. Hwang and R. Thorn, “The Effect of User Engagement on System Success: A Meta-analytical Integration of Research Findings,” Information & Management, vol. 35, no. 4, 1999, pp. 229-236.
10. F. Davis, R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, 1989, pp. 982-1002.
11. J. Hartwick and H. Barki, “Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use,” Management Science, vol. 40, no. 4, 1994, pp. 440-465.
49 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool