The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - November/December (2009 vol.26)
pp: 41-47
Sebastien Vaucouleur , IT University of Copenhagen
Stephen Giff , Microsoft Visual Studio
ABSTRACT
The cooperative practices of customizing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are designed to provide integrated support for companies' various business processes. The authors report on empirical research that addresses ERP customization as software engineering focuses on knowledge sharing and cooperation.
INDEX TERMS
D.2 Software Engineering, D Software/Software Engineering, D.2.14 Human Factors in Software Design, J Computer Applications, J.1 Administrative Data Processing, J.1.a Business
CITATION
Sebastien Vaucouleur, Stephen Giff, "ERP Customization as Software Engineering: Knowledge Sharing and Cooperation", IEEE Software, vol.26, no. 6, pp. 41-47, November/December 2009, doi:10.1109/MS.2009.173
REFERENCES
1. C. Dörner, J. Hess, and V. Pipek, "Improving Information Systems by End-User Development: A Case Study," Proc. ECIS, Univ. of St. Gallen, 2007, pp. 783–794.
2. H. Wu and L. Cao, "Community Collaboration for ERP Implementation," IEEE Software, Nov./Dec. 2009, pp. 48–55; http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109 MS.2009.148.
3. L. Pries Heje and Y. Dittrich, "ERP Implementation as Design: Looking at PD for Means to Facilitate Knowledge Integration," Scandinavian J. Information Systems, preprint, vol. 21, no. 2,2009; http://iris.cs.aau.dk/index.phparchieve.html .
4. M.L. Markus, D. Petrie, and S. Axline, "Bucking the Trends: What the Future May Hold for ERP Packages," Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 2 no. 2, 2000, pp. 181–193.
5. C. Robson, Real World Research, Blackwell, 2002.
6. Y. Dittrich and S. Vaucouleur, Customizing and Upgrading ERP Systems, A Reality Check, tech. report TR2008-105, IT-Univ. of Copenhagen, 2008.
7. B.C. Meyers and P. Oberndorf, Managing Software Acquisition: Open Systems and COTS Products, Addison-Wesley, 2002.
8. D. Kirk, M. Roper, and M. Wood, "Identifying and Addressing Problems in Object-Oriented Framework Reuse," Empirical Software Eng., vol. 12, no. 3, 2007, pp. 243–274.
9. C. Ncube, P. Oberndorf, and A.W. Kark eds., "Opportunistic Software Systems Development: Making Systems from What's Available," IEEE Software, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 38–41.
10. J. Noble, and R. Biddle, Notes on Postmodern Programming, tech. report CS-TR-02/9, School of Mathematical and Computing Sciences, Victoria Univ. of Wellington, 2002.
11. S. Vaucouleur and P. Sestoft, "Technologies for Evolvable Software Products: The Conflict between Customizations and Evolution," Advances in Software Eng., LNCS 5316, E Börger and A. Cisternino eds., Springer, 2008, pp. 216–253.
12. E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998.
13. Ultra-Large-Scale Systems: The Software Challenge of the Future, tech. report, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., 2006; www.sei.cmu.edu/uls/filesULS_Book2006.pdf .
14. L. Suchman, "Working Relations of Technology Production and Use," Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 2, no. 1, 1994, pp. 21–39.
6 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool