The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - July/August (2009 vol.26)
pp: 77-83
Frank van der Linden , Philips Healthcare
Pentti Marttiin , Nokia Siemens Networks
ABSTRACT
The European software-intensive industry is facing challenges related to heterogeneous distributed development. These challenges are due to the commodification of software. Software that originally was differentiating (that is, helped distinguish one company's products from another's) is now available as a commodity. So, embedded systems companies are adopting open source practices and becoming involved in open source development. This article illustrates how two large European companies in the secondary software sector utilize collaborative open source development to deal with software commodification. Software commodification can also lead to new forms of collaborative development, such as inner-source development.
INDEX TERMS
open source, commodification of software, software engineering, software management, computers and society, information systems
CITATION
Frank van der Linden, Pentti Marttiin, "Commodification of Industrial Software: A Case for Open Source", IEEE Software, vol.26, no. 4, pp. 77-83, July/August 2009, doi:10.1109/MS.2009.88
REFERENCES
1. B. Fitzgerald, "The Transformation of Open Source Software," MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 3, 2006, pp. 587–598.
2. A.A. Jilderda, Inner Source Software Engineering at MIP Fostering a Meritocracy of Peers, research report, Philips Research, 2004.
3. B. Lings et al., "A Reference Model for Successful Distributed Development of Software Systems," Proc. 2nd IEEE Int'l Conf. Global Software Eng. (ICGSE 07), IEEE Press, 2007, pp. 130–139.
4. P.J. Ågerfalk et al., "Assessing the Role of Open Source Software in the European Secondary Software Sector: A Voice from Industry," Proc. 1st Int'l Conf. Open Source Systems, 2005, pp. 82–87; http://oss2005.case.unibz.it/Papers62.pdf .
5. J. Feller, P. Finnegan, and J. Hayes, "Open Source Net-works: An Exploration of Business Model and Agil-ity Issues," Proc. 14th European Conf. Information Sys-tems (ECIS 06), CD-ROM, 2006.
6. FLOSS Final Report—Part 1: Free/Libre Open Source Software: Survey and Study, Univ. of Maastricht, 2002; www.infonomics.nl/FLOSSreport.
7. B. Lundell, B. Lings, and E. Lindqvist, "Perceptions and Uptake of Open Source in Swedish Organizations," Open Source Systems: IFIP Working Group 2.13 Foundation Conf. Open Source Software—2nd Int'l Conf. Open Source Systems, Springer, 2006, pp. 151–163.
8. S. Robert, "Open Source: A Solution for Embedded Systems Software?" presentation at ITEA 2 Symp., 2008; http://symposium.itea2.org/attachments/30 Open_Source.zip.
9. N.J. Carr, "IT Doesn't Matter," Harvard Business Rev., May 2003, pp. 41–49.
10. F. Letellier, "Bringing Open Source Middleware to the Mainstream by Federating Business Ecosystems," ObjectWeb Executive Committee, INRIA (French Nat'l Inst. for Research in Computer Science and Control), June 2005.
11. ITEA Report on Open Source Software, ITEA (Information Technology for European Advancement), Jan. 2004; www.itea2.orgitea_report_on_oss.
12. B. Perens, "The Emerging Economic Paradigm of Open Source," First Monday, vol. 10, no. 10, 2005; http://perens.com/ArticlesEconomic.html.
13. J. West, "Value Capture and Value Networks in Open Source Vendor Strategies," Proc. 40th Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences (HICSS 07), IEEE CS Press, 2007, p. 176.
14. P. Nagy, "Open Source in Imaging Informatics," J. Digital Imaging, vol. 20,supplement 1, 2007, pp. 1–10.
15. I. Haddad, "Linux and Open Source in Telecommunications," Linux J.,30 Sept. 2006; www.linuxjournal.com/article9128.
47 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool