The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - May/June (2009 vol.26)
pp: 104, 103
Adenekan (Nick) Dedeke , Northeastern University
ABSTRACT
The evidence is not that clear-cut on whether Linux's performance and quality are higher than those of Windows.
INDEX TERMS
Linux, Windows, open source software, software development, software security
CITATION
Adenekan (Nick) Dedeke, "Is Linux Better than Windows Software?", IEEE Software, vol.26, no. 3, pp. 104, 103, May/June 2009, doi:10.1109/MS.2009.72
REFERENCES
1. R. Glass, "A Look at the Economics of Open Source," Comm. ACM, vol. 47, no. 2, 2004, pp. 25–27.
2. G. Gousios et al., "Software Quality Assessment of Open Source Software," Current Trends in Informatics: 11th Panhellenic Conf. Informatics (PCI 07), vol. A, New Technologies Publications, 2007, pp. 303–315.
3. D. Spinellis, Code Quality: The Open Source Perspective, Addison-Wesley, 2006.
4. F. Shull, "Who Needs Evidence Anyway? IEEE Software, Sept.–Oct. 2007, pp. 10–11.
5. B. Weiner, Open Benchmark: Windows NT Server 4.0 and Linux, Mindcraft, 1999; www.mindcraft.com/whitepapersopenbench1.html .
6. Linux versus Windows NT: The Verdict, Bloor Research, 1999; www.bloor-research.com/research/white-paper/ 188linux-v-windows-nt-the-verdict.html .
7. I. Samoladas et al., "Open Source Software Development Should Strive for Even Greater Code Maintainability," Comm. ACM, vol. 47, no. 10, 2004, pp. 83–87.
8. H. Thompson, Reliability: Analyzing So-lution Uptime as Business Needs Change, Security Innovation, 2005.
9. D. Spinellis, "A Tale of Four Kernels," Proc. 30th Int'l Conf. Software Eng. (ICSE 08), ACM Press, 2008, pp. 381–390.
10. P. Mell, K. Scarfone, and S. Romanosky, A Complete Guide to Common Vulnerability Scoring System Version 2.0, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, 2007; www.first.org/cvsscvssguide.html.
23 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool