The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - January/February (2009 vol.26)
pp: 96-102
Catriona Macaulay , University of Dundee
David Sloan , University of Dundee
Xinyi Jiang , University of Dundee
Paula Forbes , University of Dundee
Scott Loynton , University of Dundee
Jason R. Swedlow , University of Dundee
Peter Gregor , University of Dundee
ABSTRACT
Usability is a growing issue for developers of scientific software. Scientists seeking software to support scientific discovery and funding bodies seeking better return on investment increase the pressure to produce scientific software that has an impact beyond a limited set of users (that is, scientists in a single lab). However, developing software for even a limited set of users is challenging, and commercial design techniques are rarely available for scientific software development in academic settings. Lessons learned from a case study in which developers integrated usability and user-centered design (UCD) methods into an image-data-management software suite for cell biologists might be useful to others working in similar contexts.
INDEX TERMS
design methodologies, user interfaces, user-centered design
CITATION
Catriona Macaulay, David Sloan, Xinyi Jiang, Paula Forbes, Scott Loynton, Jason R. Swedlow, Peter Gregor, "Usability and User-Centered Design in Scientific Software Development", IEEE Software, vol.26, no. 1, pp. 96-102, January/February 2009, doi:10.1109/MS.2009.27
REFERENCES
1. S. Baxter et al., "Scientific Software Development Is Not an Oxymoron," PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 2, no. 9, 2006, p. e87.
2. G. Wilson, "Where's the Real Bottleneck in Scientific Computing?" Am. Science, vol. 94, no. 5, 2005.
3. C. Letondal and W. Mackay, "Participatory Programming and the Scope of Mutual Responsibility: Balancing Scientific, Design and Software Commitment," Proc. Participatory Design Conf. (PDC 04), ACM Press, 2004, pp. 31–41.
4. D. Nichols and M. Twidale, "The Usability of Open Source Software," First Monday, vol. 8, no. 1, 2003; www.firstmonday.org/Issues/issue8_1nichols .
5. P. McInerney and F. Maurer, "UCD in Agile Projects: Dream Team or Odd Couple?" Interactions, vol. 12, no. 6, 2005, pp. 19–23.
6. H. Javahery, A. Seffah, and T. Radhakrishnan, "Beyond Power: Making Bioinformatics Tools User-Centered," Comm. ACM, vol. 47, no. 11, 2004, pp. 58–63.
7. M. Schraefel et al., "Breaking the Book: Translating the Chemistry Lab Book into a Pervasive Computing Lab Environment," Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 04), ACM Press, 2004, pp. 25–32.
8. I. Goldberg et al., "The Open Microscopy Environment (OME) Data Model and XML File: Open Tools for Informatics and Quantitative Analysis in Biological Imaging," Genome Biology, vol. 6, 2005, p. R47.
9. M. Kuniavsky, Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research, Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
10. J. Nielsen and R. Mack eds., Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley &Sons, 1994.
11. "IBM Software Accessibility Guidelines," 2008; www-03.ibm.com/able/guidelines/softwareaccesssoftware.html.
12. C. Macaulay, D. Benyon, and C. Crerar, "Ethnography, Theory and Design: From Intuition to Insight," Int'l J. Human-Computer Studies, vol. 53, 2000, pp. 35–60.
13. N. Shadbolt, T. Berners-Lee, and W. Hall, "The Semantic Web Revisited," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, 2006, pp. 96–101.
16 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool