The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - May/June (2008 vol.25)
pp: 60-66
Jacco Wesselius , Philips Healthcare
ABSTRACT
Since 1997, Philips Healthcare has been developing a software platform for its medical-equipment product line. Initially, the company used a closed-source approach, with a centralized platform development group. In the course of development, this process has evolved into a more open-source approach in which Philips Healthcare's entire software development community contributes to platform development. Making such a transition is not trivial. Given the typical OSS culture, a top-down approach—essentially forcing groups to become suppliers on the internal software market—won't work. For groups to switch from being consumers to being suppliers, they must have incentives and find the prospect attractive. Philips Healthcare has been working toward an internal open-source market for more than five years. In this article, the author describes the company's evolving process along with lessons learned about market mechanisms and business models for the internal software market. The key question guiding their efforts is how to turn software consumers into active producers of the platform assets.
INDEX TERMS
software engineering management, reusable software, reuse models, inner-source software development, business models, open source software development, software platform development
CITATION
Jacco Wesselius, "The Bazaar inside the Cathedral: Business Models for Internal Markets", IEEE Software, vol.25, no. 3, pp. 60-66, May/June 2008, doi:10.1109/MS.2008.79
REFERENCES
1. F. van der Linden, K. Schmid, and E. Rommes, Software Product Lines in Action—The Best Industrial Practice in Product Line Engineering, Springer, 2007.
2. M. Ruffin and C. Ebert, "Using Open Source Software in Product Development: A Primer," IEEE Software, vol. 21, no. 1, 2004, pp. 82–86.
3. E.S. Raymond, The Cathedral and the Bazaar—Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, O'Reilly, 2001.
4. P. Clements and L. Northrop, Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns, Addison-Wesley, 2001.
5. K. Pohl, G. Böckle, and F. van der Linden, Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques, Springer, 2005.
6. R. Rajala, M. Rossi, and V.K. Tuunainen, "A Framework for Analyzing Software Business Models," Proc. 11th European Conf. Information Systems (ECIS 03), 2003; http://project.hkkk.fi/gebsi/files/nav_activities/ materialSBDSS%20Business%20Model% .
7. M. Rossi, ed., Deliverable D1.1.1—State of The Art Report, ITEA COSI, 2006; www.itea-cosi.org/modules/wikimodindex.php?page=ProjectDeliverables .
8. F. Hecker, "Setting Up Shop: The Business of Open-Source Software," IEEE Software, vol. 16, no. 1, 1999, pp. 45–51.
9. B. Fitzgerald, "The Transformation of Open Source Software," MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 3, 2006, pp. 587–598.
10. S. Krishnamurthy, "An Analysis of Open Source Business Models," Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, J. Feller et al., eds., MIT Press, 2005, pp. 279–296.
11. M. Iansiti and G.L. Richards, "The Business of Free Software: Enterprise Incentives, Investment, and Motivation in the Open Source Community," Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, no. 07-028, 2006; www.hbs.edu/research/pdf07-028.pdf.
12. C. Asay, "Monetizing FOSS: The Red Hat Solution," InfoWorld,11 Jan. 2007; http://akamai.infoworld.com/weblog/openresource/ archivesClark%20Asay%20-%20Free%20and%20Open%20Source%20Software%20Business.pdf .
13. J. Wesselius, "Strategic Scenario-Based Valuation of Product Line Roadmaps," Software Product Lines—Research Issues in Engineering and Management, T. Käköläand J.C. Dueñas, eds., Springer, 2006, pp. 53–89.
24 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool