This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
N-Version Design Versus One Good Version
November/December 1997 (vol. 14 no. 6)
pp. 71-76
ASCII Text
x 
 
Les Hatton, "N-Version Design Versus One Good Version," IEEE Software, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 71-76, November/December, 1997.
 
 
BibTex
x
 
@article{ 10.1109/52.636672,
author = {Les Hatton},
title = {N-Version Design Versus One Good Version},
journal ={IEEE Software},
volume = {14},
number = {6},
issn = {0740-7459},
year = {1997},
pages = {71-76},
doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/52.636672},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
}
 
 
RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote
x 
 
TY - MGZN
JO - IEEE Software
TI - N-Version Design Versus One Good Version
IS - 6
SN - 0740-7459
SP71
EP76
EPD - 71-76
A1 - Les Hatton,
PY - 1997
KW - diversity
KW - n-version
KW - formal methods
KW - defect density
KW - reliability
VL - 14
JA - IEEE Software
ER -
 
Evidence indicates that n-version development techniques are more reliable than producing one "good" version-and cost effective in the long run. The author concludes that diverse, independent channels used in parallel are significantly superior to even the current state of the art, especially in situations where cost of failure is high.
Index Terms:
diversity, n-version, formal methods, defect density, reliability
Citation:
Les Hatton, "N-Version Design Versus One Good Version," IEEE Software, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 71-76, Nov.-Dec. 1997, doi:10.1109/52.636672
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.