This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Understanding Recording Technologies in Everyday Life
July-September 2010 (vol. 9 no. 3)
pp. 64-71
ASCII Text
x 
 
Michael Massimi, Khai N. Truong, David Dearman, Gillian R. Hayes, "Understanding Recording Technologies in Everyday Life," IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 64-71, July-September, 2010.
 
 
BibTex
x
 
@article{ 10.1109/MPRV.2009.89,
author = {Michael Massimi and Khai N. Truong and David Dearman and Gillian R. Hayes},
title = {Understanding Recording Technologies in Everyday Life},
journal ={IEEE Pervasive Computing},
volume = {9},
number = {3},
issn = {1536-1268},
year = {2010},
pages = {64-71},
doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MPRV.2009.89},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
}
 
 
RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote
x 
 
TY - MGZN
JO - IEEE Pervasive Computing
TI - Understanding Recording Technologies in Everyday Life
IS - 3
SN - 1536-1268
SP64
EP71
EPD - 64-71
A1 - Michael Massimi,
A1 - Khai N. Truong,
A1 - David Dearman,
A1 - Gillian R. Hayes,
PY - 2010
KW - tracking and recording technologies
KW - day reconstruction method
KW - conceptual model
KW - privacy
VL - 9
JA - IEEE Pervasive Computing
ER -
 
Michael Massimi, University of Toronto
Khai N. Truong, University of Toronto
David Dearman, University of Toronto
Gillian R. Hayes, University of California, Irvine
Electronic recording and surveillance systems are arguably some of the most pervasive technologies in the world today. Despite this rapid proliferation and their study by many researchers, there is still work to be done in understanding how people reason about these technologies when they encounter them. In this article, the authors describe attitudes, perceptions, and concerns regarding electronic recording encountered in daily activities. They present data gathered from interviews grounded in real experiences that form the basis of a discussion for how people develop mental models about the intent and uses of a broad scope of recording technologies embedded in the world. Individual constructions of reality about current recording systems, including the people, places, and activities that surround them, provide insight into how design, technology, and policy can work together to provide appropriate information about the existence and uses of recording devices. These insights can lead to usable systems that allow individual users to make informed personal decisions

1. D. Solove, The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age, NYU Press, 2004, p. 290.
2. J.Q. Anderson, "The Future of the Internet II," Pew Internet and American Life Project, Sept. 2006; www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/188report_display.asp .
3. J. Dixon, M. Levine, and R. McAuley, "Street Drinking Legislation, CCTV, and Public Space: Exploring Attitudes towards Public Order Measures," Mar. 2007; www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/uploadsMarkLevine20041022T115242.pdf .
4. D. Kahneman et al., "A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method," Science, vol. 306, no. 5702, 2004, pp. 1776–1780.
5. G.R. Hayes et al., "Physical, Social, and Experiential Knowledge of Privacy and Security in a Pervasive Computing Environment," IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, 2007, pp. 56–63.
6. S. Wiggins et al., "The Psychological Consequences of Predictive Testing for Huntington's Disease," New England J. Medicine, vol. 327, no. 20, 1992, pp. 1401–1405.
1. J. Dixon, M. Levine, and R. McAuley, "Street Drinking Legislation, CCTV, and Public Space: Exploring Attitudes towards Public Order Measures," Mar. 2007; www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/uploadsMarkLevine20041022T115242.pdf .
2. T. Honess and E. Charman, Closed Circuit Television in Public Places: Its Acceptability and Perceived Effectiveness, London Home Office Police Dept., 1992, p. 41.
3. G. Iachello et al., "Prototyping and Sampling Experience to Evaluate Ubiquitous Computing Privacy in the Real World," Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006), ACM Press, 2006, pp. 1009–1018.
4. B. Friedman et al., "The Watcher and the Watched: Social Judgments about Privacy in a Public Place," Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 21, 2006, pp. 233–274.
5. G. Iachello and J. Hong, "End-User Privacy in Human-Computer Interaction," Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 1, 2007, pp. 1–137.
6. C. Beckmann, S. Consolvo, and A. La Marca, "Some Assembly Required: Supporting End-User Installation in Domestic Ubiquitous Computing Environments," Proc. 6th Int'l Conf. Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp 2004), Springer, 2004, pp. 107–124.
7. G. Conti and E. Sobiesk, "An Honest Man Has Nothing to Fear: User Perceptions on Web-Based Information Disclosure," Proc. Symp. Usable Privacy and Security (Soups 2007), ACM Press, 2007, pp. 112–121.
8. F. Tari, A.A. Ozok, and S.H. Holden, "A Comparison of Perceived and Real Shoulder-Surfing Risks between Alphanumeric and Graphical Passwords," Proc. Symp. Usable Privacy and Security (Soups 2006), ACM Press, 2006, pp. 56–66.

Index Terms:
tracking and recording technologies, day reconstruction method, conceptual model, privacy
Citation:
Michael Massimi, Khai N. Truong, David Dearman, Gillian R. Hayes, "Understanding Recording Technologies in Everyday Life," IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 64-71, July-Sept. 2010, doi:10.1109/MPRV.2009.89
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.