The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.01 - January-March (2011 vol.18)
pp: 98-103
Christian Müller , German Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence
Garrett Weinberg , Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs
<p>Editor's Note</p><p>With the increased functionality offered by in-vehicle systems, multimodal input is emerging as an effective means of interaction to minimize driver distraction. This article describes the current state of this technology for automotive applications, various ways to combine modalities, and outlooks toward the future.</p><p align="right">&#x2014;<it>Anthony Vetro</it></p>
multimodal, input, automotive, speech, voice, gesture, touch, gaze.
Christian Müller, Garrett Weinberg, "Multimodal Input in the Car, Today and Tomorrow", IEEE MultiMedia, vol.18, no. 1, pp. 98-103, January-March 2011, doi:10.1109/MMUL.2011.14
1. Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE Recommended Practice: Navigation and Route Guidance Function Accessibility While Driving (SAE 2364), tech. report SAE 2364, Jan. 2000.
2. L. Garay-Vega et al., "Evaluation of Different Speech and Touch Interfaces to In-Vehicle Music Retrieval Systems," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 42, no. 3, 2010, pp. 913-920.
3. U. Gärtner, W. König, and T. Wittig, "Evaluation of Manual vs. Speech Input When Using a Driver Information System in Real Traffic," Proc. Int'l Driving Symp. Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Transportation Research Board, 2001.
4. S. Oviatt, "Multimodal Interfaces," T he Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, 2nd ed., A. Sears, and J.A. Jacko eds., CRC Press, 2007, pages 413-432.
5. M.J. Pitts et al., "Assessing Subjective Response to Haptic Feedback in Automotive Touchscreens," , Proc. 1st Int'l Conf. Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, ACM Press, 2009, pp. 11-18.
6. S. Castronovo, A. Mahr, and C. Müller, "Multimodal Dialog in the Car: Combining Speech and Turn-and-Push Dial to Control Comfort Functions," Proc. Interspeech, ISCA Press 2010, pp. 510-513.
7. C. Endres, T. Schwartz, and C. Müller, "'Geremin': 2D Microgestures For Drivers Based On Electric Field Sensing," Proc. Int'l Conf. Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM Press, 2011.
8. A. Pauzié and G. Pachiaudi, "Subjective Evaluation of the Mental Workload in the Driving Context," Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application, T. Rothengatter, and E. Carbonell Vaya eds., Pergamon, 1997, pp. 173-82.
9. B. Mehler et al., , "Impact of Incremental Increases in Cognitive Workload on Physiological Arousal and Performance in Young Adult Drivers," Transportation Research Record: J. Transportation Research Board, vol. 2138, no. 1, 2009, pp. 6-12.
10. ISO 26022:2010—Road Vehicles—Ergonomic Aspects of Transport Information and Control Systems—Simulated Lane Change Test to Assess In-Vehicle Secondary Task Demand, ISO, 2010.
11. G. Weinberg et al., "Contextual Push-to-Talk: Shortening Voice Dialogs to Improve Driving Performance," Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. Human– Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM Press, 2010 pp. 113-122.
367 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool