This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
November/December 2007 (vol. 27 no. 6)
pp. 6
David H. Albonesi, Cornell University
A productive, healthy debate is informative and insightful, and collectively moves the debaters and the audience closer to a potential solution or agreement by examining the issues from multiple viewpoints and critiquing those arguments. Micro editor in chief David Albonesi introduces four debates on computer architecture from the Computer Architecture Research Directions (CARD) workshop that was held as part of the 13th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture in February 2007.

[1] J. Choi et al., "Thermal-Aware Task Scheduling at the System Software Level," Proc. Int'l Symp. Low Power Electronics and Design, ACM Press, 2007.
[2] H.F. Hamann et al., "Hotspot-Limited Microprocessors: Direct Temperature and Power Distribution Measurements," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, no. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 56-65.
[3] E. İpek et al., "Core Fusion: Accommodating Software Diversity in Chip Multiprocessors," Proc. Int'l Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA 07), ACM Press, 2007, pp. 186-197.

Index Terms:
computer architecture, debates, low power, reliability, security, single-threaded, multithreaded
Citation:
David H. Albonesi, "Productive and Healthy Debate," IEEE Micro, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2007, doi:10.1109/MM.2007.106
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.