This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Federal Appeals Court Sees Potential Antitrust Violation in Standardization Skullduggery
September/October 2007 (vol. 27 no. 5)
pp. 109-110
The US court of appeals in Philadelphia recently ruled that intentional deception of a private standard-setting organization, when used to acquire or maintain monopoly power, can be an illegal monopolistic practice. The ruling reversed a trial court decision that had dismissed Broadcom's lawsuit against Qualcomm involving the latter's patented technology in the UMTS standard for cell phones. Stern explains the ruling and notes its implications for IEEE standard-setting bodies.
Index Terms:
law, standardization, antitrust policy, RAND, patents, licensing
Citation:
Richard Stern, "Federal Appeals Court Sees Potential Antitrust Violation in Standardization Skullduggery," IEEE Micro, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 109-110, Sept.-Oct. 2007, doi:10.1109/MM.2007.83
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.