|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
| | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Shane Greenstein, "Four nightmares for net neutrality," IEEE Micro, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 12-13, November/December, 2006. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/MM.2006.111, author = {Shane Greenstein}, title = {Four nightmares for net neutrality}, journal ={IEEE Micro}, volume = {26}, number = {6}, issn = {0272-1732}, year = {2006}, pages = {12-13}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MM.2006.111}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - IEEE Micro TI - Four nightmares for net neutrality IS - 6 SN - 0272-1732 SP12 EP13 EPD - 12-13 A1 - Shane Greenstein, PY - 2006 KW - economics KW - markets KW - government KW - regulation KW - Internet VL - 26 JA - IEEE Micro ER - | |||
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MM.2006.111
What is the economic substance behind arguments for and against net neutrality? Shane Greenstein analyzes the economic bases of four "nightmare scenarios" frequently cited by advocates of net neutrality--inequity, corporate bureaucracy, bad incentives, and less innovative content.
Index Terms:
economics, markets, government, regulation, Internet
Citation:
Shane Greenstein, "Four nightmares for net neutrality," IEEE Micro, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 12-13, Nov.-Dec. 2006, doi:10.1109/MM.2006.111
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.

