This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
New Jersey federal court holds Qualcomm's unFRANDly acts no antitrust violation
September/October 2006 (vol. 26 no. 5)
pp. 9, 84-85
A New Jersey federal district court recently threw out Broadcom's suit against Qualcomm, in which Broadcom charged that Qualcomm's reneging on promises to make its technology available to standard adopters on "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) terms constituted a violation of antitrust laws. Stern argues against the judge's decision, focusing on the distinction between "monopoly" and "monopolization."
Index Terms:
Broadcom, Qualcomm, antitrust law
Citation:
Richard Stern, "New Jersey federal court holds Qualcomm's unFRANDly acts no antitrust violation," IEEE Micro, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 9, 84-85, Sept.-Oct. 2006, doi:10.1109/MM.2006.97
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.